The Supreme Cucks said no because they fear the left more than they fear us. Collating and disseminating this information is the first step to solving the problem.

In a court based scenario, the more absolute and easily understood the proof is, the hard of a time the courts will have to say no. A better information game mobilizes larger percentages of normies to push conservative lawyers and politicians to run more court cases and change more laws. Trump lost the aftermath of the election by having an absolutely shit information game. There is no scenario where additional information and proof HURTS.

In a civil war based scenario, the more absolute and easily understood the proof is, the more numerous and vigorous the fighters will be. The more people get involved in the system, pushing court cases, and then LOSING those battles, despite how solid their data is, the more committed they'll be to fighting even harder.

The more information, the more people push. The more people push, the more the government fears and cracks down. The more the government fears and cracks down, the more they back conservatives into the corner, forcing them out of their 9 to 5, or 6 to 8 safe spaces, and out on to the proverbial battlefield; where they become activists, problem solvers, and even as a last resort, warfighters.

Again, there is no scenario, legal, kinetic, or otherwise where more information, especially better presented and more easily understood information, makes the situation worse. I'm not holding my breath for the golden ticket, but this ground game right here is essential for drawing the battle lines for any metaphorical or literal engagements to come over the next few years.