3225
Comments (392)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
79
SurfingUSA [S] 79 points ago +81 / -2

From the article, folks, this really is it:

That is what an organic election fraud database starts to look like. Here, let’s do one!

Billy X has 239 people living in his one-bedroom Pennsylvania house and they all voted. All public information. Billy should be proud of his diligence.

We connect Billy via 100 social media posts floating on the internet using a web crawler. Look, Billy is a steward for the local trade union. He hates Trump.

Data visualization indicates Billy corresponds with Sally B. and Mortimer W. They live in Virginia. They too, hate Trump; so says social media. Our new friends in Virginia interested in election fraud start adding their data about Sally and Mort. Here are two addresses for Sally and they tie to over 600 registered voters. Mort has over 150 living in his one bedroom flat.

This is how it looks, folks. This is just the surface of what can be found from current, available, public records, social media and internet communication. We can go hundreds of layers deeper and it is delivered in the blink of an eye.

So when you freak out about H.R. 1, which is terrible, remember, they may have Marc Elias in their corner but the Patriots have data, technology, and adversaries who leave dinosaur tracks.

6
halfstep 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't they mail crap to these addresses? Wouldn't it set off some major red flags with 1 residential address receiving 600+ voter mail pieces?

2
SurfingUSA [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your tax dollars at work. (Election boards being dip-sh!ts)

On top of which, likely these are ballots shipped in from China and filled in on Long Island or whatever, then shipped into Pa. or wherever. I.e., they must have been able to tap into election databases to get names and some of the addresses to launch from.