Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
DerJeffer 5 points ago +5 / -0

In a "free" nation, why does "need" have ANYTHING to do with whether or not someone shoud be allowed to HAVE something...

...perhaps you'd explain to ME just why we "need" to have pot?

Oh...and you CAN "hunt" with AR's. That's a misnomer propagated (sigh, again) by anti-gun activists. I have friends who use AR's to "hunt" regularly, and LEGALLY, in the SW states. One is a predator-control contractor. He is paid to eliminate predators, skins them, distributes their skins among his tribal relatives (who process them), then trades them across the US and Canada to bring back the very best across several species to distribute among all the tribal nations.

So you really are just perpetuating the "anti-gun" narrative when you oppose ownership of Armalite Rifles among the civilian populace. We're all in this together, you know.

We aren't all would-be murderers just because we choose to own a firearm you disagree about. Why don't you take your place right where you truly ARE, and simply make YOUR case. The fact is, you haven't won the anti-gun argument, and you're just trolling to find excuses to hone your argument.