If you allow true freedom of speech you’ll get lots of racist content. I’m fine with that as it’s free speech, but sponsors sure as shit aren’t. The entire platform will naturally be demonized. Maybe default the site so racism is filtered out as much as possible and allow users to select their own filtration themselves?
True. I'm all for that, I'd happily pay $10-20/m for a quality YouTube alternative, problem is content. We'd need all the Cumias, Gavins, Crowders and Nick DiPaolos to congregate and attract users. Problem is they're all spreading apart and creating their own platforms, I don't want 10 different subscriptions at $5-20/m.
If you allow true freedom of speech you’ll get lots of racist content. I’m fine with that as it’s free speech, but sponsors sure as shit aren’t. The entire platform will naturally be demonized. Maybe default the site so racism is filtered out as much as possible and allow users to select their own filtration themselves?
Or we can just move on beyond the ad supported revenue model.
True. I'm all for that, I'd happily pay $10-20/m for a quality YouTube alternative, problem is content. We'd need all the Cumias, Gavins, Crowders and Nick DiPaolos to congregate and attract users. Problem is they're all spreading apart and creating their own platforms, I don't want 10 different subscriptions at $5-20/m.
Agreed, hopefully this is an interim before we have a true free speech alternative.