There is a difference between what we have all seen and "know" as anecdotal evidence. and actual evidence that would stand up to journalistic scrutiny.
We all know they stole the election, but what is the EXACT tangible way they did it.
It may hurt your feelings but nobody has shown the actual smoking guns
I've read the report, no need to get upset young lady.
The report lays out many irregularities, it doesn't actually have the hard evidence.
And i'm not dismissing the report or the irregularities, but Pool has a consistent career of not accepting allegations like this as fact, and he is fair about it no matter what side it comes from.
You want Pool to be something he is not, and because of this you hate him for it.
The only way someone hasn’t seen the evidence is if they haven’t looked.
Grow up.
There is a difference between what we have all seen and "know" as anecdotal evidence. and actual evidence that would stand up to journalistic scrutiny.
We all know they stole the election, but what is the EXACT tangible way they did it.
It may hurt your feelings but nobody has shown the actual smoking guns
It’s laid out in the Navarro report you dumb, lazy fuck.
Regent’s Univeristy recently did a 7hr review of the evidence which you are too stupid to follow apparently?
Idiot cuckatrons like you are why we lose.
I've read the report, no need to get upset young lady.
The report lays out many irregularities, it doesn't actually have the hard evidence.
And i'm not dismissing the report or the irregularities, but Pool has a consistent career of not accepting allegations like this as fact, and he is fair about it no matter what side it comes from.
You want Pool to be something he is not, and because of this you hate him for it.