Yep. What is the law but words? What’s the constitution but words? Words don’t protect people by themselves. That’s why restraining orders are so useless when a criminal wants to kill their victim.
The point being made here is there's no court in existence that would uphold the Nuremberg code. This is by far the most atrocious part about the modern political times: crimes are subjectively prosecuted and laws are conveniently forgotten, all when it is advantageous for the globalists.
The right to travel freely, unencumbered is a natural right expressed so necessarily, it need not be mentioned
1858 Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999). "For the purposes of this case, we need not identify the source of [the right to travel] in the text of the Constitution. The right of free ingress and regress to and from' neighboring states which was expressly mentioned in the text of the Article of Confederation, may simply have been conceived from the beginning to be a necessary concomitant of the stronger Union the Constitution created."' Id. at 501
“No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
“If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
Murdock v PA shines directly upon all these states have “licenses” for purchasing, owning, and bearing firearms. Curious how theses cases hold up today (overridden by subsequent cases).
Notice how the EUA was granted so the vaccine could PREVENT covid, but CDC says you will still get it, must still wear masks and keep distance, etc. All bullshit and the EUA should be revoked immediately.
While that is true, that needs to be coupled with the other violations listed when they ask, such as breaks freedom of movement, 4th amendment, HIPAA, and probably the most lethal weapon in the argument, medical discrimination.
Not sure if you noticed but the left doesn't obey the laws and they are in control of all branches of the government. We need to wrestle back control of our nation and enforce it's laws.
these masks have made people psychotic, violently so. I'm afraid its going to get really ugly when we finally start taking these stupid things off, many people are scarred for the rest of their lives.
There were two serious adverse events of facial swelling in vaccine recipients with a history of injection of dermatological fillers. The onset of swelling was reported 1 and 2 days, respectively, after vaccination and was likely related to vaccination.
Every morning in my way to work, the radio station plays an ad from the CDC saying the vaccine is safe and authorized by the FDA. Such manipulative bullshit - your average sheep out there doesn’t know that an emergency use authorization is not the same as the approval so they all think its been approved by the FDA.
I’ve now had multiple conversations with friends (some now former friends) along the lines of “I’ll be happy to consider the vaccine when its approved”
“IT HAS BEEN APPROVED YOU IDIOT”
“No, its been authorized for use in an emergency, but every variant, from Moderna, J&J, Pfizer, etc, is still in trails.”
“NO ITS BEEN APPROVED OTHERWISE NO ONE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GET IT.”
And then more attempts to point out company websites, FDA definitions, etc, but ultimately it just devolves to the point where its pointless.
That is a simple question to ask a state rep. Call and ask this question.
If the vaccine jabs like Moderna are still in phase 3 clinical trials wouldn't the proposed vaccine passports be considered a violation of the Nuremberg code, as well as HIPAA regulations on privacy Ask your state rep. to clarify their position on this, and watch them efffing choke, most likely they will say they will get back to you, and they never will. The point is to CALL AND ASK! DO IT! DO NOT WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO FIGHT THE INSANITY FOR YOU, CALL AND ASK!
Who is going to enforce Nuremberg Code? If our pussy supreme judges explicitly coward out with no standing, you think General Patton and Eisenhower gonna climb out from their grave and force everyone to comply? Guns. Only guns and explicit threat and perhaps assasinations just like BLM will make them comply. Any other ways are pure wishful thinking. Nice guy always finish last. Be nice and you get incinerated.
The reason why it's under Emergency Use Authorization is because it's still in trials and not approved by the FDA. We should really only be giving it to the vulnerable populations who are severely impacted by the China flu. Unfortunately, the media and the pharma companies did a great job scaring the public into taking this experimental concoction.
The Nuremburg code applies to all testing, diagnosis, and treatment of any kind, not just experimentation.
Article 6, section 1:
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
Article 6, section 3:
In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual's informed consent.
The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War
However, since the vaccines are experimental and thus part of ongoing research," HHS regulations at 45 CFR part 46 for the protection of human subjects in research require that an investigator obtain the legally effective informed consent of the subject.". Also, to prevent coercion or undue influence of employees or students by their employers or schools, the regulations require that the investigator seek consent only under circumstances that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence (45 CFR 46.116). The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) recommends that institutions have policies in place that clarify for students and employees that any participation of students in research must be voluntary. Employee participation raises questions about the ability of employees to exercise free choice, for example, because of the possibility that a decision to participate could affect performance evaluations or job advancement, even if it is only the employee’s perception that this is the case. Source
FYI: A U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) document dated April 17, 1947, titled Medical Experiments in Humans stated: "It is desired that no document be released which refers to experiments with humans that might have an adverse reaction on public opinion or result in legal suits. Documents covering such fieldwork should be classified Secret."source
A Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine in participants 18 years of age and older is ongoing in the United States
A Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine in participants 18 years of age and older is ongoing in the United States
If you still think they care about the law, you're wrong.
Yep. What is the law but words? What’s the constitution but words? Words don’t protect people by themselves. That’s why restraining orders are so useless when a criminal wants to kill their victim.
That's why there are no such thing as "rights". It's a flawed concept.
Came here to say this. Anyone who thinks that law and order matter anymore has already forgotten the recent "election"
The Nazis followed the laws they wrote but that didn't save them at Nuremberg.
The point being made here is there's no court in existence that would uphold the Nuremberg code. This is by far the most atrocious part about the modern political times: crimes are subjectively prosecuted and laws are conveniently forgotten, all when it is advantageous for the globalists.
No, you are just uninformed.
https://jamesfetzer.org/2021/03/international-criminal-court-the-hague-accepted-covid-19-complaint-of-violation-of-nuremberg-code-by-israeli-government/
Annnd six days later, we already have one ruling: "Europe Rights Court Backs Obligatory (Mandatory) Vaccinations"
https://www.barrons.com/news/obligatory-jabs-necessary-in-democratic-society-europe-rights-court-01617875705
That's the EU court, not the International Court at the Hague. It doesn't surprise me though.
I predict the future: The Court will conclude that no violations occurred and that mandating a COVID vaccine is for the common good
Is the numberbutg code law? Nope. There is literally no obligation to abide.
Hague International Court disagrees with you. I hear you can still go to prison for war crimes.
Only the Republicans go to jail
Sure, an international court ruling that international courts have power. Cute.
You're absolutely right. It would. Now find a court willing to uphold it.
The only court willing to uphold it is the street court where you decide to be the judge, jury, and executioner with your AR15.
The right to travel freely, unencumbered is a natural right expressed so necessarily, it need not be mentioned
1858 Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999). "For the purposes of this case, we need not identify the source of [the right to travel] in the text of the Constitution. The right of free ingress and regress to and from' neighboring states which was expressly mentioned in the text of the Article of Confederation, may simply have been conceived from the beginning to be a necessary concomitant of the stronger Union the Constitution created."' Id. at 501
“No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
“If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
Learn your rights, Flex em. Do not give an inch.
What good are rights when the police, the courts (including SCOTUS), and the media all ignore them?
Rights are only as strong as the will of the people to protect them.
What good are rights if apathy dominates the citizenry?
How do you protect something that everyone tells you doesn't exist?
Lmao, You exercise em. Kinda like an atrophied muscle. Don't be a pussy. Be a MAN.
Lol try that out and let me know how it goes
Been going fine for me in all honesty.
Murdock v PA shines directly upon all these states have “licenses” for purchasing, owning, and bearing firearms. Curious how theses cases hold up today (overridden by subsequent cases).
If you think any of that matters, you aren't living in reality.
I'm sorry, I don't comprehend doomer fag shit.
The mandated masks violate nuremberg because they are forced. You are supposed to be able to refuse any medical procedure.
Notice also that the Emergency Use only lasts as long as Covid is declared an emergency, aka this is never going away
Notice how the EUA was granted so the vaccine could PREVENT covid, but CDC says you will still get it, must still wear masks and keep distance, etc. All bullshit and the EUA should be revoked immediately.
While that is true, that needs to be coupled with the other violations listed when they ask, such as breaks freedom of movement, 4th amendment, HIPAA, and probably the most lethal weapon in the argument, medical discrimination.
Not sure if you noticed but the left doesn't obey the laws and they are in control of all branches of the government. We need to wrestle back control of our nation and enforce it's laws.
these masks have made people psychotic, violently so. I'm afraid its going to get really ugly when we finally start taking these stupid things off, many people are scarred for the rest of their lives.
Source - https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/clinical-trial-data
Interesting reaction.
Every morning in my way to work, the radio station plays an ad from the CDC saying the vaccine is safe and authorized by the FDA. Such manipulative bullshit - your average sheep out there doesn’t know that an emergency use authorization is not the same as the approval so they all think its been approved by the FDA.
I’ve now had multiple conversations with friends (some now former friends) along the lines of “I’ll be happy to consider the vaccine when its approved”
“IT HAS BEEN APPROVED YOU IDIOT”
“No, its been authorized for use in an emergency, but every variant, from Moderna, J&J, Pfizer, etc, is still in trails.”
“NO ITS BEEN APPROVED OTHERWISE NO ONE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GET IT.”
And then more attempts to point out company websites, FDA definitions, etc, but ultimately it just devolves to the point where its pointless.
That is a simple question to ask a state rep. Call and ask this question. If the vaccine jabs like Moderna are still in phase 3 clinical trials wouldn't the proposed vaccine passports be considered a violation of the Nuremberg code, as well as HIPAA regulations on privacy Ask your state rep. to clarify their position on this, and watch them efffing choke, most likely they will say they will get back to you, and they never will. The point is to CALL AND ASK! DO IT! DO NOT WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO FIGHT THE INSANITY FOR YOU, CALL AND ASK!
Sure, let's all trust Big Pharma.
https://apnews.com/619efb65b9eeec5650f011b960a152e9
And remember when Bayer sold HIV tainted meds...knowingly sold HIV tainted meds.
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/bayer-ag-knowingly-sold-hiv-contaminated-products-in-eu-with-fda-approval-despite-us-ban/
I didn't think any of them were fda approved?
Who is going to enforce Nuremberg Code? If our pussy supreme judges explicitly coward out with no standing, you think General Patton and Eisenhower gonna climb out from their grave and force everyone to comply? Guns. Only guns and explicit threat and perhaps assasinations just like BLM will make them comply. Any other ways are pure wishful thinking. Nice guy always finish last. Be nice and you get incinerated.
nazis don't need to follow the law
The reason why it's under Emergency Use Authorization is because it's still in trials and not approved by the FDA. We should really only be giving it to the vulnerable populations who are severely impacted by the China flu. Unfortunately, the media and the pharma companies did a great job scaring the public into taking this experimental concoction.
The Nuremburg code applies to all testing, diagnosis, and treatment of any kind, not just experimentation.
Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual's informed consent.
And this is how the Class Action Lawsuit gets initiated. Everybody's gonna be rich!
Lol
I'm sure pointing out the law will make the librul politicians change their mind. /s
What's Nuremberg Code?
The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War
This is a very important post. However, it is also important to know that The Kodex has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association.
However, since the vaccines are experimental and thus part of ongoing research," HHS regulations at 45 CFR part 46 for the protection of human subjects in research require that an investigator obtain the legally effective informed consent of the subject.". Also, to prevent coercion or undue influence of employees or students by their employers or schools, the regulations require that the investigator seek consent only under circumstances that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence (45 CFR 46.116). The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) recommends that institutions have policies in place that clarify for students and employees that any participation of students in research must be voluntary. Employee participation raises questions about the ability of employees to exercise free choice, for example, because of the possibility that a decision to participate could affect performance evaluations or job advancement, even if it is only the employee’s perception that this is the case. Source
Nothing about mRNA or anything
In Australia it's been give provisional authorisation with the understanding that the benefits out weight the potential risks.
FYI: A U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) document dated April 17, 1947, titled Medical Experiments in Humans stated: "It is desired that no document be released which refers to experiments with humans that might have an adverse reaction on public opinion or result in legal suits. Documents covering such fieldwork should be classified Secret." source
If they're at phase 3 that's impressive, because phase 1 is the safety phase and the phase I'm most concerned with. Phase 3 is real world efficacy.
That's directly from Moderna, here is the link to the source: https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/clinical-trial-data
Let all the libs get it. Hopefully they all get cancer or heart attacks quickly and die off before 2024
I doubt your average branch Covidian would understand the weight Nuremberg to begin with.
Be ready to sue Biden administration for war crimes!