258 🚨 🚨 🚨 BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech and that Section 230 is unconstitutional 🚨 🚨 🚨 (twitter.com) PEPE posted 9 days ago by beta-detector 9 days ago by beta-detector +260 / -2 26 comments share 26 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (26) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 2 ▼ – TownesVanCamp 2 points 9 days ago +2 / -0 BMD, he wouldn’t issue an opinion unless there was an 11th circuit decision that required an opinion, correct? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – BasedMedicalDoctor 1 point 9 days ago +1 / -0 Hell if I know. I can answer most questions about medicine but very little about the law. But unless section 230 just became invalid — which I don’t see that it did — then I don’t think Thomas did anything. permalink parent save report block reply
BMD, he wouldn’t issue an opinion unless there was an 11th circuit decision that required an opinion, correct?
Hell if I know. I can answer most questions about medicine but very little about the law. But unless section 230 just became invalid — which I don’t see that it did — then I don’t think Thomas did anything.