So where are you stacking bodies?

You lefties would not be burning cities to the ground if there were a price to pay.

Which isn't really that offensive and still illuminating.

i personally have had a lot of success using memes like one person i know used to think BLM was the bees knees now she thinks they are terrorists. watch this movie called "the Buttercream Gang" it lays out exactly what we have to to over the next 4 years or so. we need to change public opinion of conservatives before we can really change the world again. the movie the buttercream gang is about this gang that instead of turning to crime they do things like plant flowers around the city, help old people bring in their groceries, clean the city of trash, things like that. we need to change public opinion on us we need to form buttercream gangs all over the country that i think will be the best thing average intelligence people like you and myself can do that won't hurt anyone and we can change the country. i know it's just a movie but the concept is what we will have to do to change how the public perceives us and we can easily completely change the media's narrative.

I'd like to hear exactly what you have in mind. You've got something or you wouldn't have posted. Check out my history, not gonna call you a glowie.

Claiming it's institutions is just your half assed response. Institutions are run by lefty faggots. Hence lefty faggots are destroying my country.

Nah - how about you get the fuck out.

You're a fucking tumor.

Because he's a fag

If our "leaders" are shitting all over us, then we don't have leaders. And if the conservative way is to just lay down and accept this bullshit, then I don't want be a conservative. What exactly are we conserving? Posting memes online doesn't do shit. We aren't organized. We don't fightback. When they do enforce the vaccine passports, 99% of you fucktards will just roll over and take it. When is enough enough?

It’s not optics.

People are presented with three choices, siding with us, siding with them, or NEITHER. Some people on our side think it’s just an either/or scenario, when it’s not. You don’t build coalitions by being just as fucking evil as your opponent, but wearing flag colors instead of black.

Even President Trump threw us under the bus.

AFTER CALLING US TO DC IN THE FIRST PLACE

Don't think I didn't forget that - because he did it no fewer than THREE FUCKING TIMES.

Man is of good intent. When you see evil everywhere in man’s intent — in your own actions and those of others — then you set yourself up against your own existence, and that of your kind. You focus upon the gulf between your ideals and your experience, until the gulf is all that is real. You will not see man’s good intent, or you will do so ironically — for in comparison with your ideals, good in the world appears to be so minute as to be a mockery.

Each individual is innately driven by a good intent, however distorted that intent may become, or however twisted the means that may be taken to achieve it.

As the body wants to grow from childhood on, so all of the personality’s abilities want to grow and develop. Each person has his or her own ideals, and impulses direct those ideals naturally into their own specific avenues of development — avenues meant to fulfill both the individual and his society. Impulses provide specifications, methods, meanings, definitions. They point toward definite avenues of expression, avenues that will provide the individual with a sense of actualization, natural power, and that will automatically provide feedback, so that the person knows he is impressing his environment for the better.

Those natural impulses, followed, will automatically lead to political and social organizations that become both tools for individual development and implements for the fulfillment of the society. Impulses then would follow easily, in a smooth motion, from private action to social import. When you are taught to block your impulses, and to distrust them, then your organizations become clogged. You are left with vague idealized feelings of wanting to change the world for the better, for example — but you are denied the personal power of your own impulses that would otherwise help direct that idealism by developing your personal abilities. You are left with an undefined, persisting, even tormenting desire to do good, to change events, but without having any means at your disposal to do so. This leads to lingering frustration, and if your ideals are strong the situation can cause you to feel quite desperate.

You may begin to exaggerate the gulf between this generalized ideal and the specific evidences of man’s "greed and corruption" that you see so obviously about you. You may begin to concentrate upon your own lacks, and in your growing sense of dissatisfaction it may seem to you that most men are driven by a complete lack of good intent.

You may become outraged, scandalized — or worse, filled with self-righteousness, so that you begin to attack all those with whom you do not agree, because you do not know how else to respond to your own ideals, or to your own good intent.

The job of trying to make the world better seems impossible, for it appears that you have no power, and any small private beneficial actions that you can take seem so puny in contrast to this generalized ideal that you dismiss them sardonically, and so you do not try to use your power constructively. You do not begin with your own life, with your own job, or with your own associates. What difference can it make to the world if you are a better salesperson, or plumber, or office worker, or car salesman, for Christ’s sake? What can one person do?

Yet that is precisely where first of all you must begin to exert yourselves. There, on your jobs and in your associations, are the places where you intersect with the world. Your impulses directly affect the world in those relationships.

Many of you are convinced that you are not important — and while each of you feels that way it will seem that your actions have no effect upon the world. You will purposefully keep your ideals generalized, thus saving yourself from the necessity of acting upon them in the one way open to you: by trusting yourself and your impulses, and impressing those that you meet in daily life with the full validity that is your own.

Most criminals act out of a sense of despair. Many have high ideals, but ideals that have never been trusted or acted upon. They feel powerless, so that many strike out in self-righteous anger or vengeance against a world that they see as cynical, greedy, perverted. They have concentrated upon the great gaps that seem to exist between their ideals of what man should be, and their ideas of what man is.

On the one hand, they believe that the self is evil, and on the other they are convinced that the self should not be so. They react extravagantly. They often see society as the “enemy” of good. Many — not all, now — criminals possess the same characteristics you ascribe to heroes, except that the heroes have a means toward the expression of idealism, and specific avenues for that expression. And many criminals find such avenues cut off completely.

I do not want to romanticize criminals, or justify their actions. I do want to point out that few crimes are committed for “evil’s sake,” but in a distorted response to the failure of the actualization of a sensed ideal.