39
posted ago by FormerLibtard94 ago by FormerLibtard94 +39 / -0

A pede a year ago predicted that the jab would really be for a future strain that does kill people.

Why vaccinate and kill all of the citizens that will comply with you? You'd be left with a world full of dissenters.

He said they want us to know it's a 99% survival rate so it is an easy choice to refuse the vaccine. Then they jab all the sheep that would do it anyway. THEN they release a virus that WILL kill us but not announce it. When the "anti vaxxers" die, it won't raise any eyebrows because they "chose to not get vaxxed".

Makes a little bit too much sense.

Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
EthnoBiowarfareVirus 4 points ago +4 / -0

So by this logic, we SHOULD take the vaccine? Is that the conclusion?

I don't know if "THEY" have thought out this stuff as much as you did here. What I mean is, the Chinese did their biowarfare thing, and we've seen the American response which was to fast track vaccines, and the whole fiasco was used for political purposes by the left. I am still skeptical of the vax mostly because I think it may have long term unknown effects like cancer. But I don't know that there is as of yet a "grand plan" at work. It may just be like a chess game, depending on how China and the US play their cards. I agree there probably will be a worse virus at some point, but it could be unrelated to the current one