Joe Biden: "I paid you good money to rig the election. What happened?"
Democrat Fraudsters: "How were we supposed to know a physicist was going to teach an advanced math class in September 2020 using the 2010 Census data... and then see the November 2020 election data?"
YEAH, I "U" "WE" KNOW AND SO WHAT! UNTIL "WE" HURT THEM NOTHING CHANGES, NOT THE COURTS, NOT THE CONGRESS NOT THE MILITARY OR THE FOULED UP BUREAU OF INVOLUNTARY KNUCKLEHEADS!
NO HAS TO COME FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE CAN YOU GUESS WHERE PEDE!
I watched this video and was not convinced. If all else is equal, why wouldn't the same bump appear elsewhere in voter activity? Suppose there are 30%. more 60 year olds than 59 year olds this year. Wouldn't you expect to see 30% more voter participation among 60 year olds compared to 59 year olds? It's because there are more of them.
His data shows that EVERY county in a given state exhibited the identical percentage turnout in each age group.
Further the total votes conform based on 2010 census data. Which is simply an incorrect number for 2020. The certified votes are directly linked to the numbers that can only be true if nobody died or moved across county lines in the past ten years.
Such a pattern in a single county would be a major indicator of fraud... but all of the counties having the same pattern is a similar probability to sitting down at a poker table and being dealt a 5 card hand of quad Aces for seven straight hands in a row.
The first time, you're a lucky bastard... second time people tell stories and demand a new deck and dealer. A Third time? The casino is shutting down until they figure out what the hell is going on.
This is significant because his data shows that EVERY county in a given state exhibited the identical percentage turnout in each age group.
Further the total votes conform based on 2010 census data. Which is simply an incorrect number for 2020. The certified votes are directly linked to the numbers that can only be true if nobody died or moved across county lines in the past ten years.
Such a pattern in a single county would be a major indicator of fraud... but all of the counties having the same pattern is a similar probability to sitting down at a poker table and being dealt a 5 card hand of quad Aces for seven straight hands in a row.
The first time, you're a lucky bastard... second time people tell stories and demand a new deck and dealer. A Third time? The casino is shutting down until they figure out what the hell is going on.
https://lindelltv.com/
Screenshot at 33:36.
"This was fresh in my mind..."
What are the odds?
I mean, the odds aren't necessarily non-existent.
Plenty of equations can have similar looking output correlation. It just depends on whatever you're inputting into it.
Is it likely? No, of course not
But having similar behavior doesn't make it fact
reasonable doubt, sure
but that wouldn't fly in court on its sole merit
The odds of two counties, especially a large urban and small rural exhibiting the same turnout pattern is infinitesimal.
That ALL the counties in a given state would conform to the same predicted curve is undeniable proof of fraud.
Joe Biden: "I paid you good money to rig the election. What happened?"
Democrat Fraudsters: "How were we supposed to know a physicist was going to teach an advanced math class in September 2020 using the 2010 Census data... and then see the November 2020 election data?"
What. A. Patriot.
I can does mafs
YEAH, I "U" "WE" KNOW AND SO WHAT! UNTIL "WE" HURT THEM NOTHING CHANGES, NOT THE COURTS, NOT THE CONGRESS NOT THE MILITARY OR THE FOULED UP BUREAU OF INVOLUNTARY KNUCKLEHEADS!
NO HAS TO COME FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE CAN YOU GUESS WHERE PEDE!
The evidence of fraud is overwhelming. What's missing is the jail time.
Great video! Don't miss it.
We all know there was fraud, now it is being reconstructed with mathematics. Mathematics is racists to liberals.
Its going to be very interesting when the 2020 census data can be integrated into this as well. I suspect that it will expose even more fraud.
I watched this video and was not convinced. If all else is equal, why wouldn't the same bump appear elsewhere in voter activity? Suppose there are 30%. more 60 year olds than 59 year olds this year. Wouldn't you expect to see 30% more voter participation among 60 year olds compared to 59 year olds? It's because there are more of them.
His data shows that EVERY county in a given state exhibited the identical percentage turnout in each age group.
Further the total votes conform based on 2010 census data. Which is simply an incorrect number for 2020. The certified votes are directly linked to the numbers that can only be true if nobody died or moved across county lines in the past ten years.
Such a pattern in a single county would be a major indicator of fraud... but all of the counties having the same pattern is a similar probability to sitting down at a poker table and being dealt a 5 card hand of quad Aces for seven straight hands in a row.
The first time, you're a lucky bastard... second time people tell stories and demand a new deck and dealer. A Third time? The casino is shutting down until they figure out what the hell is going on.
Thank you, ColoradoTrumper45
And that is significant because...?
This is significant because his data shows that EVERY county in a given state exhibited the identical percentage turnout in each age group.
Further the total votes conform based on 2010 census data. Which is simply an incorrect number for 2020. The certified votes are directly linked to the numbers that can only be true if nobody died or moved across county lines in the past ten years.
Such a pattern in a single county would be a major indicator of fraud... but all of the counties having the same pattern is a similar probability to sitting down at a poker table and being dealt a 5 card hand of quad Aces for seven straight hands in a row.
The first time, you're a lucky bastard... second time people tell stories and demand a new deck and dealer. A Third time? The casino is shutting down until they figure out what the hell is going on.