67
Comments (27)
sorted by:
3
UltraFrogMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

So jews are poc now.

4
generated_name 4 points ago +4 / -0

It all depends on their political leanings. Works the same way for "white Hispanic" people.

1
Mark4-39 1 point ago +1 / -0

And then there are Sephardic Jews lol... double trouble

3
MrMcGreenGenes 3 points ago +3 / -0

POCOTB = Person Of Color Other Than Black

3
Hilareeee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jesus was Jewish . Look at the Jews . He looked that. They’ve been around awhile .

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jews have all sorts of racial components now. We don't know which He was. This tells us how important it is.

At the time, it's most likely He was olive skinned with dark hair. If Ashkenazi (Caucasian) Jews existed at that time, it's not at all likely any returned to Galilee to create His lineage. I haven't gone looking through His ancestry for this, but we have it and they all seemed to stay put in the region.

1
Hilareeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jews in Israel today could have easily been Jews from 2000 years ago. It’s not like they were hanging out in Manhattan. There are Syrians that are white with red curly hair . Heck, a lot of the pharaohs of Egypt were white had red hair (they don’t talk about this much for some reason) . We don’t know what he looked like. It doesn’t matter .

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pharaohs were redheads? I've never seen that claim before.

I agree that this is unimportant, but a couple people are insisting Jesus was white. I think it's at least as silly as the sign in the OP. The basis being given doesn't check out.

2
Hilareeee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Google it. Wild stuff .

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Red hair found in mummies is no indication of hair color when alive. It's a natural process of decay.

DNA studies show the ancestry; if there are natural redheads in key regions of Africa today, then the claim of redheaded Pharaohs is plausible.

It's not.

1
Hilareeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recents studies have debunked the embalming myth. Embalming did not change hair color. There are fair skinned / red haired people in the region. Don’t be racist .

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not the issue. Nobody claims embalming turned hair red, it's a natural process of decay.

Prevailing theory remains that red hair came about as people crossed the Caucasus mountains. (Also farther east, but at a similar latitude) There is no evidence that any people groups returned to the cradle of civilization after moving there.

Red haired people that live in the region now migrated there A.D.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +4 / -3

Where's the lie tho? He was most likely not white. Most people around the Mediterranean are more olive colored, a tone a white person will never tan to.

Crucifixion was state sponsored violence.

It's a strange way of putting it, but it's not made up as you describe. I think it invites someone to miss the point of the Gospel entirely, creating new Discipleship challenges. Of course I have no idea if they're prepared to meet those challenges; that would be the bigger concern.

10
PerchingEagle 10 points ago +10 / -0

He wasn't crucified because of his skin color. This is heavily insinuated with this message. People who divide everyone by skin color and propagate hatred are evil.

If they just left it, "Jesus Was Murdered By State-Sanctioned Violence," the message would be more based.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +3 / -1

TRUE!

While I hate to make the comparison, GF didn't die because of his skin color either; that's totally irrelevant and the other facts of the case explain what happened without that. Hopefully the trial addresses this!

The Bible doesn't mention Jesus' skin color, that's how important it is.

2
UltraFrogMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo

3
UltraFrogMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah not gonna argue. But we should start calling jews poc anyway

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is an interesting point. On one hand, Jews record themselves as being 89% white in the US, when they're looking to garner sympathy. (Old, aging, in danger of disappearing)

At the same time they claim not being white for diversity / intersectionality points.

Also, some Jews really are Caucasians. Ashkenazi, for example. Semites (Arabs and Jews) aren't Caucasians. Does any of this really matter? How much inter-breeding has taken place at this point?

Without hiring quotas that discriminate against white men none of this would matter.

2
BigFreedomBoner 2 points ago +5 / -3

Most people around the Mediterranean are more olive colored, a tone a white person will never tan to.

Do you listen to yourself? Maybe you want to go back an delete your comment.

So those who tan well aren't real white? Wow. Do you carry color swatches around with you to discern from whites white enough for you and whites not white enough for you?

Pro-tip: Jesus was white. Say it after me: JESUS WAS WHITE. With a great tan like all people with wonderful souls. He was not a lost Arab. Not a lost African. But White.

Perhaps part of your discipleship challenge should be not supporting divisive leftist claims.

Repeat after me: It's OK to be white. Even for our Savoir. Lying about who he was for a political fashion is sad and is a way to cancel a whole race of people. And there you are - more than ready to help out.

It doesn't matter if Jesus was black. If he were black. I'd happily say he is black. As that would be the truth. And Jesus is truth.

-2
CuomoisaMassMurderer -2 points ago +2 / -4

What makes you assert "Jesus was white?'

"Tan well" is specifically excluded from what I said, jackass. "Not white enough for me" has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I said. Nor does the rest of your rant.

Maybe learn to read. Some day. Just a thought. Couldn't hurt, right?

-1
BigFreedomBoner -1 points ago +1 / -2

So Jews are now something other than White?

Seriously when you go to Brooklyn and you see Hasidic Jews do you say to yourself, "my, what fine looking colored people?"

Or do you think "Those might be the most white people ever?"

Thanks for the ad hominem. Its the tell you know you lost.

-1
CuomoisaMassMurderer -1 points ago +0 / -1

Ashkenazi Jews are Caucasians. Other groups are Asians, not white. Jews identify as not white to score diversity points.

2
Mark4-39 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sephardic Jews aren't Asian, fyi. They're from Spain/North Africa. Mizrahi Jews are the Asians you are looking for. These are all post-70 AD population developments tho. Those are the 3 largest, but there are smaller enclaves too.

Interesting read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_ethnic_divisions

Also, no matter what the nutters who think the 10 tribes of Israel are Irish and European, Jesus wasn't white. And good for him. Imagine the sunburn at that latitude with no sunblock!

1
leon_06 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole message of the cross is drowned by these wolves in sheep clothing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
shogun5000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao, leftist faggots always look exactly how you'd expect.