Where's the lie tho? He was most likely not white. Most people around the Mediterranean are more olive colored, a tone a white person will never tan to.
Crucifixion was state sponsored violence.
It's a strange way of putting it, but it's not made up as you describe. I think it invites someone to miss the point of the Gospel entirely, creating new Discipleship challenges. Of course I have no idea if they're prepared to meet those challenges; that would be the bigger concern.
He wasn't crucified because of his skin color. This is heavily insinuated with this message. People who divide everyone by skin color and propagate hatred are evil.
If they just left it, "Jesus Was Murdered By State-Sanctioned Violence," the message would be more based.
While I hate to make the comparison, GF didn't die because of his skin color either; that's totally irrelevant and the other facts of the case explain what happened without that. Hopefully the trial addresses this!
The Bible doesn't mention Jesus' skin color, that's how important it is.
This is an interesting point. On one hand, Jews record themselves as being 89% white in the US, when they're looking to garner sympathy. (Old, aging, in danger of disappearing)
At the same time they claim not being white for diversity / intersectionality points.
Also, some Jews really are Caucasians. Ashkenazi, for example. Semites (Arabs and Jews) aren't Caucasians. Does any of this really matter? How much inter-breeding has taken place at this point?
Without hiring quotas that discriminate against white men none of this would matter.
Most people around the Mediterranean are more olive colored, a tone a white person will never tan to.
Do you listen to yourself? Maybe you want to go back an delete your comment.
So those who tan well aren't real white? Wow. Do you carry color swatches around with you to discern from whites white enough for you and whites not white enough for you?
Pro-tip: Jesus was white. Say it after me: JESUS WAS WHITE. With a great tan like all people with wonderful souls. He was not a lost Arab. Not a lost African. But White.
Perhaps part of your discipleship challenge should be not supporting divisive leftist claims.
Repeat after me: It's OK to be white. Even for our Savoir. Lying about who he was for a political fashion is sad and is a way to cancel a whole race of people. And there you are - more than ready to help out.
It doesn't matter if Jesus was black. If he were black. I'd happily say he is black. As that would be the truth. And Jesus is truth.
"Tan well" is specifically excluded from what I said, jackass. "Not white enough for me" has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I said. Nor does the rest of your rant.
Maybe learn to read. Some day. Just a thought. Couldn't hurt, right?
Where's the lie tho? He was most likely not white. Most people around the Mediterranean are more olive colored, a tone a white person will never tan to.
Crucifixion was state sponsored violence.
It's a strange way of putting it, but it's not made up as you describe. I think it invites someone to miss the point of the Gospel entirely, creating new Discipleship challenges. Of course I have no idea if they're prepared to meet those challenges; that would be the bigger concern.
He wasn't crucified because of his skin color. This is heavily insinuated with this message. People who divide everyone by skin color and propagate hatred are evil.
If they just left it, "Jesus Was Murdered By State-Sanctioned Violence," the message would be more based.
TRUE!
While I hate to make the comparison, GF didn't die because of his skin color either; that's totally irrelevant and the other facts of the case explain what happened without that. Hopefully the trial addresses this!
The Bible doesn't mention Jesus' skin color, that's how important it is.
Bingo
Yeah not gonna argue. But we should start calling jews poc anyway
This is an interesting point. On one hand, Jews record themselves as being 89% white in the US, when they're looking to garner sympathy. (Old, aging, in danger of disappearing)
At the same time they claim not being white for diversity / intersectionality points.
Also, some Jews really are Caucasians. Ashkenazi, for example. Semites (Arabs and Jews) aren't Caucasians. Does any of this really matter? How much inter-breeding has taken place at this point?
Without hiring quotas that discriminate against white men none of this would matter.
Do you listen to yourself? Maybe you want to go back an delete your comment.
So those who tan well aren't real white? Wow. Do you carry color swatches around with you to discern from whites white enough for you and whites not white enough for you?
Pro-tip: Jesus was white. Say it after me: JESUS WAS WHITE. With a great tan like all people with wonderful souls. He was not a lost Arab. Not a lost African. But White.
Perhaps part of your discipleship challenge should be not supporting divisive leftist claims.
Repeat after me: It's OK to be white. Even for our Savoir. Lying about who he was for a political fashion is sad and is a way to cancel a whole race of people. And there you are - more than ready to help out.
It doesn't matter if Jesus was black. If he were black. I'd happily say he is black. As that would be the truth. And Jesus is truth.
What makes you assert "Jesus was white?'
"Tan well" is specifically excluded from what I said, jackass. "Not white enough for me" has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I said. Nor does the rest of your rant.
Maybe learn to read. Some day. Just a thought. Couldn't hurt, right?
So Jews are now something other than White?
Seriously when you go to Brooklyn and you see Hasidic Jews do you say to yourself, "my, what fine looking colored people?"
Or do you think "Those might be the most white people ever?"
Thanks for the ad hominem. Its the tell you know you lost.
Ashkenazi Jews are Caucasians. Other groups are Asians, not white. Jews identify as not white to score diversity points.