He only let that go after extensive cross examination. He did his level best to serve the prosecution by giving only the slanted and partial answers he had been coached through. Police at this level are politicians.
Yep. So, you have to line them up...take 2-3 out with one shot. Or do it the old fashion way, blast them, then walk over and ask or dig out your bullet back.
Just kidding...mostly. 😂
he also said it was against regulation to put floyd in that position. He said both, but the media is focusing on the latter part, pushing for more riots when theres no conviction.
He was, but it was careful half lying coached by a team of experienced lawyers. Upon being pressed he clarified that he felt the length of time in that position is what constituted it being against policy because the policies carry a lot of subjective language like "as necessary." He stated his position as fact during direct but it turned out to be uninformed (at best) speculation.
The purpose of this interview was to create headlines. The MSM is only reporting prosecution approved statements from direct and pretending that cross never happened. They're trying to maximize anger and violence upon aquital.
Rioters should just target media institutions, after all they are the ones lying to them and manipulating them. I would be fine with those "peaceful protests".
It means a lot, but they've done this enough that they've been able to hone their methods and are eventually going to reach the capability of convicting people regardless of what the evidence says.
The trial itself is a farce for soo many reasons, especially because it's impossible to have an impartial jury at this point. Every single juror has had a year to see all the riots and get influenced by fake news, there's no way that they haven't formed a strong opinion on the case before they became jurors.
There's also already issues with the jurors themselves. Best case scenario is probably a mistrial. Then they'll use their second chance to stack the jury even further, especially after all the riots that will take place with anything less than a guilty verdict. There comes a point where people see sacrificing an innocent man as the greater good, because to them, Chauvin's life isn't worth the hurt feelings and all the damage and death that rioters will cause as a result of him being found innocent. So even if they believe he's innocent, they will convict out of a twisted sense of morality.
And you know damn well Biden's DOJ is probably already secretly threatening and blackmailing jurors, because Biden needs a win and if he gets it, he can tout that under his presidency, "justice" is finally served. That's too big of a political win for them to not try it.
You mean that thing that he and everyone else with a brain was saying all along? It was clear from the start that Floyd could breath just fine and that he was dying from a heart attack, but you couldn't tell that to the NPC's because they were already programmed with their narrative.
I live a few miles outside Minneapolis and have a friend who works with the local PD. She's saying they're already recruiting, training and bracing for the riots. Regardless of the verdict (should be acquitted on all counts) there's going to be chaos.
Plus UP - if you agree that unless they can somehow tie it to passing HR1 (allow unlimited mail-in voting election ripoff FOREVER!) - I predict the dem mayors will have less tolerance for the destruction of their cities and will tend to stop the riots sooner than before. I think this is true because they are not rioting to steal the election this time around..
Since the rule of law is null and void and if riots break out. It almost doesn't matter who might be on the receiving end of a self defense scenario. Since the law is there to larp and pretend to contain it and arrest you for protecting yourself and bussed in degenerates are there to cause problems.
We are more concerned with tornados here in kansas.
Good thing the chief let the public know. Serve and protect.
He only let that go after extensive cross examination. He did his level best to serve the prosecution by giving only the slanted and partial answers he had been coached through. Police at this level are politicians.
I'm significantly better armed than I was last summer; let them come.
Wish I had more ammo. Can't even get anymore.
Yep. So, you have to line them up...take 2-3 out with one shot. Or do it the old fashion way, blast them, then walk over and ask or dig out your bullet back. Just kidding...mostly. 😂
Hello friend. What type of Ammo are you looking for?
Combined arms is your friend and believe it or not often legal. Check out the Destructive Device market.
It is out there, just approaching $1/round prices.
he also said it was against regulation to put floyd in that position. He said both, but the media is focusing on the latter part, pushing for more riots when theres no conviction.
It's also against the law to eat fentanyl/meth pills, resist arrest, use counterfeit 20s, and probably a litany of other crimes.
Black privilege
If you're a white male, sure.
Then he was lying.
He was, but it was careful half lying coached by a team of experienced lawyers. Upon being pressed he clarified that he felt the length of time in that position is what constituted it being against policy because the policies carry a lot of subjective language like "as necessary." He stated his position as fact during direct but it turned out to be uninformed (at best) speculation.
The purpose of this interview was to create headlines. The MSM is only reporting prosecution approved statements from direct and pretending that cross never happened. They're trying to maximize anger and violence upon aquital.
They're going to riot regardless of the outcome of the trial.
Rioters should just target media institutions, after all they are the ones lying to them and manipulating them. I would be fine with those "peaceful protests".
puppets wearing costumes . . .
This means nothing. Don't get too excited.
It means a whole lot wtf
It means a lot, but they've done this enough that they've been able to hone their methods and are eventually going to reach the capability of convicting people regardless of what the evidence says.
The trial itself is a farce for soo many reasons, especially because it's impossible to have an impartial jury at this point. Every single juror has had a year to see all the riots and get influenced by fake news, there's no way that they haven't formed a strong opinion on the case before they became jurors.
There's also already issues with the jurors themselves. Best case scenario is probably a mistrial. Then they'll use their second chance to stack the jury even further, especially after all the riots that will take place with anything less than a guilty verdict. There comes a point where people see sacrificing an innocent man as the greater good, because to them, Chauvin's life isn't worth the hurt feelings and all the damage and death that rioters will cause as a result of him being found innocent. So even if they believe he's innocent, they will convict out of a twisted sense of morality.
And you know damn well Biden's DOJ is probably already secretly threatening and blackmailing jurors, because Biden needs a win and if he gets it, he can tout that under his presidency, "justice" is finally served. That's too big of a political win for them to not try it.
Expert testimony proves it doesn't matter. Did you see it?
Bring it on. I've left minneapolis and could care less if they burn it to the ground.
Still in Minneapolis and could care less if they burn it to the ground.
There will be riots, no matter the outcome
Boy I’m glad I live nowhere important.
Boy do I hope the frens in important places make it through this.
Chief says Chauvin was not following procedure, but he in fact was. Knee to the neck is in their training.
The riots never stopped. The news just stopped covering them.
Sadly that will happen regardless of the outcome of the trial.
Ah shit. Here we go again!
NOW is the time to locate the BLM assholes on your neighborhood....
You mean that thing that he and everyone else with a brain was saying all along? It was clear from the start that Floyd could breath just fine and that he was dying from a heart attack, but you couldn't tell that to the NPC's because they were already programmed with their narrative.
And even if it wasn't on his shoulder blade and was along the side of his neck, it's still an approved restraint by the Minneapolis PD.
Fake news. He said it was on the neck UNTIL right before paramedics came.
He threw Chauvin under the bus 100%
I wonder why the family was paid before the trial?
Clown trial
Christ they don't even spell check their fuckin headlines...
Of course the police chief is a fucking jogger.
I live a few miles outside Minneapolis and have a friend who works with the local PD. She's saying they're already recruiting, training and bracing for the riots. Regardless of the verdict (should be acquitted on all counts) there's going to be chaos.
In case anyone needs help bracing themselves:
https://davidsondefense.com/Pistol-Braces_c_653.html
Plus UP - if you agree that unless they can somehow tie it to passing HR1 (allow unlimited mail-in voting election ripoff FOREVER!) - I predict the dem mayors will have less tolerance for the destruction of their cities and will tend to stop the riots sooner than before. I think this is true because they are not rioting to steal the election this time around..
Good. Burn the cities down. I fully support defunding the police to make sure it happens.
His Soros sent them their weekly supply of kneepads ?
So when will people burn down the media organizations for gaslighting the world and encouraging race riots?
Not in my town.
Since the rule of law is null and void and if riots break out. It almost doesn't matter who might be on the receiving end of a self defense scenario. Since the law is there to larp and pretend to contain it and arrest you for protecting yourself and bussed in degenerates are there to cause problems.
Food for thought.
Whoohooo!