he also said it was against regulation to put floyd in that position. He said both, but the media is focusing on the latter part, pushing for more riots when theres no conviction.
He was, but it was careful half lying coached by a team of experienced lawyers. Upon being pressed he clarified that he felt the length of time in that position is what constituted it being against policy because the policies carry a lot of subjective language like "as necessary." He stated his position as fact during direct but it turned out to be uninformed (at best) speculation.
The purpose of this interview was to create headlines. The MSM is only reporting prosecution approved statements from direct and pretending that cross never happened. They're trying to maximize anger and violence upon aquital.
he also said it was against regulation to put floyd in that position. He said both, but the media is focusing on the latter part, pushing for more riots when theres no conviction.
It's also against the law to eat fentanyl/meth pills, resist arrest, use counterfeit 20s, and probably a litany of other crimes.
Black privilege
If you're a white male, sure.
Then he was lying.
He was, but it was careful half lying coached by a team of experienced lawyers. Upon being pressed he clarified that he felt the length of time in that position is what constituted it being against policy because the policies carry a lot of subjective language like "as necessary." He stated his position as fact during direct but it turned out to be uninformed (at best) speculation.
The purpose of this interview was to create headlines. The MSM is only reporting prosecution approved statements from direct and pretending that cross never happened. They're trying to maximize anger and violence upon aquital.