Says no such thing. Most skin tones blush. Why are you trying to prove Caucasians left our environs on some Crusade before 1500 BC? It didn't happen.
Your explanation of the Song of Solomon is ENTIRELY lacking. You ignore one of the most beautiful depictions of Christ's love for His Church, in favor of utter bullshit. Check your priorities!
The Bible does not support racial supremacy, inferiority, prejudice, or any of the crap you're spouting. It is entirely silent on Jesus' skin tone, which should tell you exactly how important this is.
The OP is a dumbass sign, pointing out that it's a dumbass sign. And it is. Don't compete with them to be the bigger dumbass.
Ok great. Now what is this talking about? What type of literature is this?
Is any of it literal?
Black people tan. Too dark to "show blood in the face," but you don't have to be Caucasian for that. Variations in skin tone exist in every tribe.
Nothing about this claims pasty skinned redheads, like some Ashkenazi Jews, were in the region at the time.
None of this explains the Song of Solomon, which is erotic poetry, and symbolism throughout.
Says no such thing. Most skin tones blush. Why are you trying to prove Caucasians left our environs on some Crusade before 1500 BC? It didn't happen.
Your explanation of the Song of Solomon is ENTIRELY lacking. You ignore one of the most beautiful depictions of Christ's love for His Church, in favor of utter bullshit. Check your priorities!
The Bible does not support racial supremacy, inferiority, prejudice, or any of the crap you're spouting. It is entirely silent on Jesus' skin tone, which should tell you exactly how important this is.
The OP is a dumbass sign, pointing out that it's a dumbass sign. And it is. Don't compete with them to be the bigger dumbass.