Benford's law requires datasets without structure that spans orders of magnitude.
Voter precincts are set to a range of sizes based on geography, population density, and logistics. This fails both of these criteria for Benford's law to be valid.
It is so non-credible I think it was likely intentional disinformation put out early to discredit other claims of voter fraud.
I have a mathematics background. I understand the potential for dataset sizes to set frequency of leading digits. I just haven't seen anyone offer evidence that that actually happened.
Lots of people saying "well if every district was exactly 1000 people then that would give a different benford curve" with nobody saying "Here is the list of district sizes"
Link?
Benford's law requires datasets without structure that spans orders of magnitude.
Voter precincts are set to a range of sizes based on geography, population density, and logistics. This fails both of these criteria for Benford's law to be valid.
It is so non-credible I think it was likely intentional disinformation put out early to discredit other claims of voter fraud.
I have a mathematics background. I understand the potential for dataset sizes to set frequency of leading digits. I just haven't seen anyone offer evidence that that actually happened.
Lots of people saying "well if every district was exactly 1000 people then that would give a different benford curve" with nobody saying "Here is the list of district sizes"
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/12i48fTL50/