2227
Comments (186)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
lmao 4 points ago +7 / -3

I can appreciate you putting your feelings into words rather than all the other triggered downvoters.

my words have nothing to do with crowder. Fact is, we were banned from reddit and mods made an entire new site, trump got banned from basically everywhere while still being president of the united states. But now I should be crying for crowder and how terrible it is he got banned for a week? Nah man, that boat has sailed, if you are still on youtube or twitter or facebook or google, you don't get to cry and expect sympathy anymore.

Are all these companies retarded and/or evil? yes. Shouldn't this happen to crowder? yes. Is crowder doing good things? yes. But stop complaining if you're going to insist on using their platforms.

5
PoliticsAreBlank 5 points ago +6 / -1

The difference is Crowder doesn't just complain, he actually takes action by fighting back legally and lobbying powerful politicians. We need to reward and encourage this type of behavior.

0
lmao 0 points ago +2 / -2

sure, if you believe there is even a slight possibility to save these companies, but I don't think so. Boycott unless there really is no other alternative platform

crowder still wants the youtube money I guess, his decision, but don't expect my sympathy when youtube does what youtube does.

and if you think the courts have your back at this point, ok then, good luck with that also.

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

Under our current circumstances, lawsuits serve a constructive purpose whether we win or lose: It would be wonderful if we won, but every court that twists or ignores the law to deny us redress helps us justify our next form of recourse, whatever that may be. When you're up against abject tyrants, going through the formalities is an important part of building your public case for stronger measures, e.g. secession. The Founding Fathers did it too.