Tucker Carlson, who edited several of Strong's articles about JournoList, wrote in a July 22 article: "Again and again, we discovered members of Journolist working to coordinate talking points on behalf of Democratic politicians, principally Barack Obama. That is not journalism, and those who engage in it are not journalists. They should stop pretending to be. The news organizations they work for should stop pretending, too. ... I've been in journalism my entire adult life, and have often defended it against fellow conservatives who claim the news business is fundamentally corrupt. It's harder to make that defense now. It will be easier when honest (and, yes, liberal) journalists denounce what happened on Journolist as wrong."[8] Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard, discussed JournoList saying, "... hundreds of journalists have gotten together, on an online listserv called JournoList, to promote liberalism and liberal politicians at the expense of traditional journalism."[11]
The news business is fundamentally corrupt, as it always is when we allow they-who-must-not-be-named to participate in it.
As Jesus said, they are the children of the Father of Lies. We can either have real journalism and a highly functional society, or racial equality under the law. Never both.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JournoList
The news business is fundamentally corrupt, as it always is when we allow they-who-must-not-be-named to participate in it.
As Jesus said, they are the children of the Father of Lies. We can either have real journalism and a highly functional society, or racial equality under the law. Never both.