If you vaccinate a 95 y/o with no immune system, they barely have a chance to get immunity...because...no immune system! Then Rona, then car accident, then dead from Rona.
Exactly. In any population, you’ll have some people who fail to mount a strong immune response. And that 5% number is a LOT worse outside of healthy volunteers.
In the UK, there was a study of cancer patients who received the vaccine. As high as 80% of them did not generate sufficient protection after two shots. No surprise given that chemo trashes your immune system.
In reality, there are a lot of people that the vaccines won’t directly benefit. Cancer patients. Autoimmune (like Lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Chrones etc) patients. That alone is 10+ million people in the US. Then add the elderly, frail and malnutritious etc and you’re talking serious numbers.
The vaccine itself really has no reason to promote immunity at all. It just makes your cells absorb some RNA that makes it produce spike proteins. These spike proteins alone aren't going to necessarily provoke an immune response.
How immunity happens naturally is a virus invades a cell and replicates until there's soo many of them in the cell, that the cell bursts. So there is a cellular distress response that goes on from this process.
Making a cell execute some RNA isn't going to create a cellular distress response, because from the cells perspective, it's only doing something it was meant to do. The immune system will simply see the cell as a friendly, and with no distress response, the immune system likely won't even be drawn to the cell. It'd be like looking for a needle in a haystack without even realizing there is a needle in the haystack.
This is why a live virus vaccine is soo crucial. Live virus vaccines promote what is called "continual antigenic stimulation". It may be a crippled virus, but it's only crippled in the sense that the more harmful aspects that cause sickness are disabled and it may be more limited in its reproduction capabilities. But it still provokes an immune response because it's not just a foreign body, it also invades cells and replicates and causes cellular distress signals that promote an immune response.
I think we've already reached herd immunity, and the pharma companies are taking advantage of that to push their useless vaccines, so they can tout effectiveness of the vaccine, knowing damn well that the immunity actually came from people already having covid. The people getting covid after being 'vaccinated', are likely just people who didn't yet get covid until then and never had any immunity at all.
So they've abused perceptions to superimpose their vaccines effectiveness over what is actually just the natural process of herd immunity, and treat those without herd immunity as just part of the ones who don't fall within that effectiveness rating.
If you vaccinate a 95 y/o with no immune system, they barely have a chance to get immunity...because...no immune system! Then Rona, then car accident, then dead from Rona.
Even with 95% effective vaccine, there 5% with no immune system can still get it.
Exactly. In any population, you’ll have some people who fail to mount a strong immune response. And that 5% number is a LOT worse outside of healthy volunteers.
In the UK, there was a study of cancer patients who received the vaccine. As high as 80% of them did not generate sufficient protection after two shots. No surprise given that chemo trashes your immune system.
In reality, there are a lot of people that the vaccines won’t directly benefit. Cancer patients. Autoimmune (like Lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Chrones etc) patients. That alone is 10+ million people in the US. Then add the elderly, frail and malnutritious etc and you’re talking serious numbers.
The vaccine itself really has no reason to promote immunity at all. It just makes your cells absorb some RNA that makes it produce spike proteins. These spike proteins alone aren't going to necessarily provoke an immune response.
How immunity happens naturally is a virus invades a cell and replicates until there's soo many of them in the cell, that the cell bursts. So there is a cellular distress response that goes on from this process.
Making a cell execute some RNA isn't going to create a cellular distress response, because from the cells perspective, it's only doing something it was meant to do. The immune system will simply see the cell as a friendly, and with no distress response, the immune system likely won't even be drawn to the cell. It'd be like looking for a needle in a haystack without even realizing there is a needle in the haystack.
This is why a live virus vaccine is soo crucial. Live virus vaccines promote what is called "continual antigenic stimulation". It may be a crippled virus, but it's only crippled in the sense that the more harmful aspects that cause sickness are disabled and it may be more limited in its reproduction capabilities. But it still provokes an immune response because it's not just a foreign body, it also invades cells and replicates and causes cellular distress signals that promote an immune response.
I think we've already reached herd immunity, and the pharma companies are taking advantage of that to push their useless vaccines, so they can tout effectiveness of the vaccine, knowing damn well that the immunity actually came from people already having covid. The people getting covid after being 'vaccinated', are likely just people who didn't yet get covid until then and never had any immunity at all.
So they've abused perceptions to superimpose their vaccines effectiveness over what is actually just the natural process of herd immunity, and treat those without herd immunity as just part of the ones who don't fall within that effectiveness rating.