Q's Latest Posts
Tuesday 12.08.2020
/qresearch/11953143 ————————————–——– We're Not Gonna Take It (CAP: >>11953295)
Either the "Plan" failed or Q was a psyop. Either way it is over.
Q's Latest Posts
Tuesday 12.08.2020
/qresearch/11953143 ————————————–——– We're Not Gonna Take It (CAP: >>11953295)
Either the "Plan" failed or Q was a psyop. Either way it is over.
Getting them to believe it will take many months if not years. The group is dying by simple attrition. I was a Anon myself and after the 1st of April passed and went without results, and the fact that all of a sudden talks of 2022 start springing to life. At this point I started questioning the whole narrative. A mod banned me for three days and this is how it went. Mod: I'm just going to ban you for three days (kinda like a cop giving you a ticket for 5 miles over and expecting a thank you for it). Me: Am I suppose to thank you for censoring me? Mod: banned me forever
Not a fan of banning people ever, we need to be champions of free speech always. We have to stand up for principles.
The ban feature should only be applied on a individual basis. Let's say for example that you don't want to see my posts (believe it or not I can understand why ppl wouldn't want to see what I have to say and I support their right to have that power), well then just make it so that my posts will not show up for them. Give the power to the individual. It is as simple as that.
That's the block button