838
Comments (55)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Quest723 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do remember the VA study was being touted as some kind of red flag

The VA study only used HCQ on it's own, and they waited to give it to people until they were already on ventilators.


  • Supposed to be given at first sign of infection
  • The HCQ supposedly helped the Vitamin-D transition the cell barrier making the cell environment hostile to viral reproduction
  • The antibiotic was to combat any bacterial infections (pneumonia) taking advantage of the inflammation from the WuFlu

They basically intentionally did everything wrong so they could say "see? It doesn't work."

Just like they stalled Trump at every step on building the wall, just so they could pretend he lied about wanting/being able to build it.

1
Red_Ensign 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's tantamount to a war crime.

2
Quest723 2 points ago +2 / -0

So we can start charging people with war crimes after we prove HCQ/Ivermectin actually work. Really should be the first step, and it'd immediately stop this vaccine passport bullshit.

1
Red_Ensign 1 point ago +1 / -0

The burden of proof would be on the deliberate disinformation campaign to incite a medical panic, with various actors in on it.

As to whether HCQ works; that much is already known. It significantly reduced viral loads if prescribed early enough and with antibiotics. Zinc was also found to help it along. If you're already on the tube...ehhh not so much.