Louisiana's 2nd Congressional District (seems heavily blue)
Ohio's 11th Congressional District (extremely blue)
New Mexico's 1st Congressional District (more likely to be an even contest, but Dems still have the advantage)
Florida's 20th Congressional District (extremely blue)
This isn't me raining on your idea, this is me saying any GOP that walks into these areas has a mountain to climb with the exception of New Mexico.
There's hope though. It's a redistricting year + GOP has more states. Redistrict some areas to make them more GOP if GOP controls the state legislatures. Might not work on the 80% blue voting districts, but there's a better chance with New Mexico. They could also redistrict to keep those 80% blue districts blue and capture less blue areas that they have a better shot at like why fight for 1 extremely blue when you can make 2 other districts easier to be red.
that why we are on defence , dems spend millions on futile seats because they play for keep and long term, every cycle texas becomes more blue becuase of illegals and immigration, but also becuase they play for the state, they dont care look at georgia, it took stacy abrams years of cheating and trying to get it blue , but she still did, if they know a seat is safe it frees them up to attack your state but if they have to fight in thier states they cant invest more resources in yours
Here's a breakdown of the people you highlighted:
This isn't me raining on your idea, this is me saying any GOP that walks into these areas has a mountain to climb with the exception of New Mexico.
There's hope though. It's a redistricting year + GOP has more states. Redistrict some areas to make them more GOP if GOP controls the state legislatures. Might not work on the 80% blue voting districts, but there's a better chance with New Mexico. They could also redistrict to keep those 80% blue districts blue and capture less blue areas that they have a better shot at like why fight for 1 extremely blue when you can make 2 other districts easier to be red.
That may be the greater win in the long run.
Resources should go to seats that can be won and I just don't see it happening in heavily blue districts.
that why we are on defence , dems spend millions on futile seats because they play for keep and long term, every cycle texas becomes more blue becuase of illegals and immigration, but also becuase they play for the state, they dont care look at georgia, it took stacy abrams years of cheating and trying to get it blue , but she still did, if they know a seat is safe it frees them up to attack your state but if they have to fight in thier states they cant invest more resources in yours