It's pretty simple, you'd rather make nonsensical assumptions and argue the meaning of words rather than the message. It's a class diversion method for people who want to waste time.
Wether or not the system is salvageable, meaning wether or not voting is worthwhile, (hint: it's not currently) has been the core argument the whole time. Something you continue to dance around. You can't argue the simple fact that those who rigged the system are still in power. You can't argue that all the Uniparty needs to do is rig 3-4 cities in a handful of swing states, most of which are already under blue control and have been for decades, to win any federal election they have a vested interest in. Rigging local elections isn't uncommon in coastal cities and blue cities in Red states either. Look at New York, Los Angeles, Portland, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Houston, Austin, etc etc etc for examples. All they have to do is hit the populace centers of states where cheating is easy because of the sheer volume and boom, they win. Every time. Just like they have been. 2016 was a fluke because their cheating model couldn't have predicted Trump's popularity. They went all out in 2020 and got away with it.
It's clear what you want. Pacification. You want to quell the rightful anger Americans feel. It won't work, glowie.
Like I said, the only was this works is if the audits pass without resistance or sabotage and definitively prove the blatant and obvious fraud. Where the news can no longer deny it. Where mockingbird is forced to sing truth. I've said this before and I'll say it again and again. We wait on the audits. If that fails, it's the ammo box. That's all we have left at that point. There is no reason to not discuss the very real possibility now and prepare together. Any talk otherwise is foolish and ignorant. Start living in reality, and start preparing for it. I'll pray for you.
How does that make any sense? If your meaning of a word is different from mine then how would arguing the message be at all fruitful? We wouldn't get anywhere. I haven't made any assumptions, only discernments. I don't have to argue that those people are still in power. Why would you want to argue about something so frivolous that we both already know? You're the only one that continues to dance around that argument. I made it and since then, you want to bring up obvious shit that has nothing to do with letting democrats win, something you still haven't acknowledged. Since it's only a few places that were rigged, it should be easy to focus on those few areas to fix the rigging. More obvious stuff we both already know that you want to use to pretend like you're arguing about voting in the future. It's clear that you want to stoke people's anger to manipulate them into a civil war or put themselves in danger when there are still many options that prevent them from risking their lives. There's a time and place for rebellion, and we haven't reached it yet. Pacification would be the extreme and just something you pulled out of your ass. Assuming has done to you what it does best. People have been pacified for decades so they don't need my help with that. Trump lit the fire under everybody's asses and you're trying to sabotage all his work. We need to stay insightful and steadfast, not pacified or angry. Waiting for the audits and readying yourself isn't something I ever argued against, so when you say start living in reality, you make yourself look stupid by saying that about something I agree with. It still has nothing to do with voting to not let democrats win. By all means, discuss real possibilities all you want and prepare for anything. Still has nothing to do with voting to not let democrats win. Seems your ego isn't as righteous as your anger.
Another comment that evades the actual argument. You want to make the argument something that I never argued about. Congratulations on being a dumbass.
It's pretty simple, you'd rather make nonsensical assumptions and argue the meaning of words rather than the message. It's a class diversion method for people who want to waste time.
Wether or not the system is salvageable, meaning wether or not voting is worthwhile, (hint: it's not currently) has been the core argument the whole time. Something you continue to dance around. You can't argue the simple fact that those who rigged the system are still in power. You can't argue that all the Uniparty needs to do is rig 3-4 cities in a handful of swing states, most of which are already under blue control and have been for decades, to win any federal election they have a vested interest in. Rigging local elections isn't uncommon in coastal cities and blue cities in Red states either. Look at New York, Los Angeles, Portland, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Houston, Austin, etc etc etc for examples. All they have to do is hit the populace centers of states where cheating is easy because of the sheer volume and boom, they win. Every time. Just like they have been. 2016 was a fluke because their cheating model couldn't have predicted Trump's popularity. They went all out in 2020 and got away with it.
It's clear what you want. Pacification. You want to quell the rightful anger Americans feel. It won't work, glowie.
Like I said, the only was this works is if the audits pass without resistance or sabotage and definitively prove the blatant and obvious fraud. Where the news can no longer deny it. Where mockingbird is forced to sing truth. I've said this before and I'll say it again and again. We wait on the audits. If that fails, it's the ammo box. That's all we have left at that point. There is no reason to not discuss the very real possibility now and prepare together. Any talk otherwise is foolish and ignorant. Start living in reality, and start preparing for it. I'll pray for you.
How does that make any sense? If your meaning of a word is different from mine then how would arguing the message be at all fruitful? We wouldn't get anywhere. I haven't made any assumptions, only discernments. I don't have to argue that those people are still in power. Why would you want to argue about something so frivolous that we both already know? You're the only one that continues to dance around that argument. I made it and since then, you want to bring up obvious shit that has nothing to do with letting democrats win, something you still haven't acknowledged. Since it's only a few places that were rigged, it should be easy to focus on those few areas to fix the rigging. More obvious stuff we both already know that you want to use to pretend like you're arguing about voting in the future. It's clear that you want to stoke people's anger to manipulate them into a civil war or put themselves in danger when there are still many options that prevent them from risking their lives. There's a time and place for rebellion, and we haven't reached it yet. Pacification would be the extreme and just something you pulled out of your ass. Assuming has done to you what it does best. People have been pacified for decades so they don't need my help with that. Trump lit the fire under everybody's asses and you're trying to sabotage all his work. We need to stay insightful and steadfast, not pacified or angry. Waiting for the audits and readying yourself isn't something I ever argued against, so when you say start living in reality, you make yourself look stupid by saying that about something I agree with. It still has nothing to do with voting to not let democrats win. By all means, discuss real possibilities all you want and prepare for anything. Still has nothing to do with voting to not let democrats win. Seems your ego isn't as righteous as your anger.
Another wall of text not addressing the core argument. Congratulations on being retarded.
Another comment that evades the actual argument. You want to make the argument something that I never argued about. Congratulations on being a dumbass.