Is Fox News capable of providing an actual source other than the quoted "source familiar with?" Or maybe we just need "a source familiar with his thinking" to validate this story.
"News" stories with zero verifiable sources are no better than the tabloid gossip rags ,and in fact, are worse because they are masquerading as actual news.
That's why I asked what is needed to confirm it happened.
The 2 answers I got are "matt gaetz saying it" and "video evidence" both of these are ridiculous. Why would a person guilty of something admit? And why would trump have a camera recording all his private talks?
So absent any verifiable source, what makes this newsworthy at all? I'd say the same about any article that was favorable to Matt. Fake news is fake news.
Is Fox News capable of providing an actual source other than the quoted "source familiar with?" Or maybe we just need "a source familiar with his thinking" to validate this story.
"News" stories with zero verifiable sources are no better than the tabloid gossip rags ,and in fact, are worse because they are masquerading as actual news.
That's a great question.
That's why I asked what is needed to confirm it happened.
The 2 answers I got are "matt gaetz saying it" and "video evidence" both of these are ridiculous. Why would a person guilty of something admit? And why would trump have a camera recording all his private talks?
So absent any verifiable source, what makes this newsworthy at all? I'd say the same about any article that was favorable to Matt. Fake news is fake news.
I like your answers. They make sense.
Verifiable source is definitely needed over anonymous source for this