They had to provide it. The Bill of Rights is read from the perspective of the Government. It tells them to regulate militias to ensure a secure and free state. The shall not be infringed is added on to the end in case anyone gets confused.
If anyone gets confused you’re supposed to follow the logic of the amendment. If the regulation doesn’t apply to disarming the people then regulation refers to keeping them properly armed. It’s clear as day in black
So the government has to force labor to manufacture arms for citizens or it has to confiscate arms or choose military contractors to pay with confiscated wealth? No thanks, I'll buy my own on the free market.
We still have the free market since that cant be infringed. The government is already purchasing the weapons and ammo. Every man or woman part of a militia gets a weekly crate of ammo at their expense lol.
Did it mean the government had to provide that or did it mean the government shouldn't prevent the citizens from arming themselves with the best?
They had to provide it. The Bill of Rights is read from the perspective of the Government. It tells them to regulate militias to ensure a secure and free state. The shall not be infringed is added on to the end in case anyone gets confused.
If anyone gets confused you’re supposed to follow the logic of the amendment. If the regulation doesn’t apply to disarming the people then regulation refers to keeping them properly armed. It’s clear as day in black
So the government has to force labor to manufacture arms for citizens or it has to confiscate arms or choose military contractors to pay with confiscated wealth? No thanks, I'll buy my own on the free market.
We still have the free market since that cant be infringed. The government is already purchasing the weapons and ammo. Every man or woman part of a militia gets a weekly crate of ammo at their expense lol.