32
Comments (14)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
FireCrotchPsaki 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dachau was not part of the "extermination camps" (death camps) but seems more akin to the Soviet gulag. My only argument with the death camps is that it does seem the Soviets swept their atrocities under the rug so to speak through the death camps. They blamed the Germans for the Katyn Massacre only to admit guilt 50 years later (among many others). I also don't agree with this moron who gets paid millions to play sportsball or anything he said, merely made a comment to provoke thought and rile some others up

1
Verrerogo 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were labor camps where you were worked to death. They used people up. They didn't last long. Some, very strong, may have. So no, not an extermination camp. A labor camp. So what. You died. Fast.

The Germans certainly had death camps. So did the Soviets.

That the Soviets blamed the Germans does not mean the Germans did not do anything bad. Indeed, without German atrocities, the cover-up would not have been convincing for fifty years.

The Germans themselves have said they are sorry. They ought to know what their parents did. Some of the older Germans personally remember what their elders did.

A story can have two villains. More than two.

1
FireCrotchPsaki 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't disagree with the first part, they used people as slave labor but I suspect the Soviets hid much of their mass murder in this manner and that's why it took so long to show any pictures when they should have done it immediately. Saying they're sorry for it means jack to me when you can literally watch days and days of ww2 footage yet hardly any footage about the extermination camps except some staged Soviet propaganda, occupied Germany's refusal to allow anyone to test the pile of bricks for cyanide (zyklon b), little evidence of the millions of people they say were killed (bones), supposedly knowing in 1942 about these types of camps, etc. The story doesn't add up like something significant is missing and for how much the media and our own government lies (even worse now) it wouldn't surprise me if there's more to it.

0
Verrerogo 0 points ago +1 / -1

People kept saying mass killings were happening but there was TREMENDOUS AMOUNT of not-listening. "You're crazy. That's impossible."

There WERE lots of photos right after the war.

The Germans did not want anybody knowing, and when it was obvious they had lost, tried hard to hide what they did. And bones burn just fine. Bone black is a pigment made from burned animal bone. An urn will hold the ashes of a cremated dead relative, as everyone knows probably. Not a big urn. It's just ash, scatters easily. They had a large land area to rake lots of it into.

The press was awful, sure, but in the direction of glossing over and hiding horrible events. Not of exaggerating them.

Every minute men fuss over exactly how much cyanide may be left in a brick from seventy years ago is another minute they didn't spend raising a child, a future. Then they complain they are targeted and disappearing. Yes, a dwindling people is easy to target. Have babies.

1
FireCrotchPsaki 1 point ago +1 / -0

😂😂😂 yeah ok boomer. You have to GRIND bones, they don't burn easily. There were no gas chambers, the forensics don't add up, the numbers aren't there, wooden doors wouldn't hold groups of people back, there wasn't enough zyklon b, the allies including the US got caught posting fake photos, they never tested the bricks in the supposed "gas chambers",pictures of a bunch of shoes isn't proof people were gassed or the photos the commies took when they staged them. Every single "death camp" was liberated by the Soviets, not the US who also had our own eugenics thanks to UC Berkeley, but you keep believing the Commie version because the US press was gooder back then 😂