3082
Comments (865)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
460
ramennov 460 points ago +462 / -2

ATTENTION

Gun control will now be referred to as gun rights infringement.

Got that?

Gun control => gun rights infringement

130
HalfBreedSupremacist 130 points ago +139 / -9

Gun control = Nazi

11
TakenusernameA 11 points ago +14 / -3

Well, the Nazis did use it to disarm the Jews before slaughtering them

5
InarosPrime 5 points ago +7 / -2

Nazis would be jealous of the Democrats

2
Kalom69 2 points ago +13 / -11

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Hitler actually restore gun right to his people?

9
TakenusernameA 9 points ago +10 / -1

Not to the Jews.

5
Commiesarenotpeople 5 points ago +6 / -1

to his people

Jews weren't his people. Research Weimar Republic. Find out why they became so popular.

2
Kalom69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah fuck 😬

1
unable_afternoon 1 point ago +12 / -11

gun ownership among germans increased under hitler.
the only people who were not allowed to have guns were non-germans.

5
Commiesarenotpeople 5 points ago +6 / -1

Downvotes, but no arguments to the contrary. Interdasting.

1
0
unable_afternoon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Jews are not even European, let alone German. Only ethnic Germans were allowed to be citizens of Germany under Hitler, and only citizens were allowed to have guns. Why should jews get special treatment? Are you dense?

0
JewsClues 0 points ago +14 / -14

Don't equate the Nazi's to this Evil Administration

-2
deleted -2 points ago +19 / -21
14
Friendly_B 14 points ago +15 / -1

Can you provide some search terms for this?

2
hailXenu 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Wooden" "doors"

8
duder56 8 points ago +10 / -2

How convenient

7
RolandDelacroix 7 points ago +11 / -4

Because Nazism was widely supported by the people of Germany. It wasn't a small group of elite assholes, it was everyone. And Nazi ideals were held by MOST people in their own countries.

2
deleted 2 points ago +14 / -12
46
Hullohoomans 46 points ago +46 / -0

Gun rights infringement

Ftfy

7
ramennov 7 points ago +8 / -1

I like it! Changed, thanks!

34
honkpillfarmer 34 points ago +34 / -0

Not gun rights. Right to self defense.

34
dahdahdah_dahditdah 34 points ago +34 / -0

The 2nd Amendment doesn't address (personal) self defense - even though it enables self defense.

The 2nd Amendment doesn't address hunting - even though it enables hunting.

The 2nd Amendment was written for the patriots who lined up on the green in Lexington and Concord. This is not even a matter of opinion. The text makes it clear.

spez: added clarification

52
559throw 52 points ago +52 / -0

It doesn't enable anything. It disables the government from infringing upon it. You have the right to bear arms because you're a free man, not because the Constitution allows you that right.

26
bh506407 26 points ago +26 / -0

Exactly. The bill of rights was made to limit the government’s power in order to have a free nation.

It’s not what the government allows us to do, it’s what WE the PEOPLE allow it to do.

This simple premise has been lost on so very many people. Some even WANT to become slaves of an authoritarian government. Which is about the most un-American thing I’ve ever seen or heard of.

Marxists are not Americans, they are traitors who despise free men and the greatest nation that was ever created.

5
Moose0528 5 points ago +6 / -1

It doesn’t even do that. The Constitution is just a piece of parchment. It is literally just a formal agreement that the Founders made with each other over the things they would overthrow the government over.

Try to take our guns? Revolution. Try to tell us when, where and how we can worship? Revolution. Try to limit our ability to speak out against the government? Revolution.

The Constitution is simply a contract, no more no less. If two parties agree to a contract, and one side violates it flagrantly, but the other party never attempts to enforce the contract then it might as well be toilet paper.

The problem is we have been trying to enforce the contract through the Democratic process, and we are just now realizing that our legal representatives have been conspiring with the other party the entire time.

4
RabidZoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem is that if no one is willing to fight back tooth and nail against tyranny they have and will infringe on and strip us of ALL of our liberties leaving us more as slaves than we already are...freedom isn't free and we have nothing really organized enough to disrupt tyranny and take back our God-given rights. We haven't disabled the government from their infringement...yet. That needs to change.

3
GODwins76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, well my AR disables the government from infringing upon it better.

2
Friendly_B 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm arguing with a Marxist online who seems to think that the 2nd Amendment is there to well-regulate guns. And that the militias are the standing armies.

2
BeardedNinjaPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well regulated ment functions well and well equiped at the time. A well regulated clock kept good time. A well regulated militia had plenty of guns all in good working order. And the militia was every male able to hold a gun.

34
ramennov 34 points ago +35 / -1

Feeling cute, might self-defend, might overthrow the federal government later

28
Donger-Lord2 28 points ago +28 / -0

Tyrannical government.

3
spelunking_librator 3 points ago +3 / -0

federal government has rights to keep and bear arms... said no constitution ever

2
TakenusernameA 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need common sense government contro.

10
DontArkancideMeBro 10 points ago +10 / -0

I believe it goes like- the right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

3
CahalTheMad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right to self-preservation, which also includes "self-defense." Lefturds HATE the idea of anyone standing up to their tyranny but it's our natural human right to do so.

0
unable_afternoon 0 points ago +1 / -1

the second amendment has nothing to do with self defense. it's for securing the existence of a free state

20
dahdahdah_dahditdah 20 points ago +20 / -0

I like the cut of your jib.

You could also say infringement of the right to keep and bear arms. That has a nice ring to it, as well.

4
elmerecido 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or IRKBA for short

17
Datamancer 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's not gun ownership, it's firearm choice. My firearm; my choice.

3
GODwins76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sometimes I choose to feed her green tips and sometimes I choose to not feed her green tips.