3082
Comments (865)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
51
DavidGlowie 51 points ago +51 / -0

Its more about how many will use the order to come take your stuff.

24
phandaal 24 points ago +25 / -1

Right. Laws are ink on paper, EOs are ink on paper, all that matters is will the people with guns come and force you to follow them.

Funny enough, not giving up our own guns makes that possibility significantly lower.

3
Jonny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Laws are ink on paper, EOs are ink on paper

To be fair, so is the constitution

4
phandaal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Indeed. That's why our founders understood that the ultimate protector of liberty is force.

Or as A. E. van Vogt said:

The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.

3
AlabamaSlamma 3 points ago +3 / -0

More likely right now, they will keep retailers from selling you stuff.

And retailers have much more to lose, so will likely comply.

It's like what we see with the chinaflu mask stuff.

It's easy to say "Fuck you, I wont wear a mask!"

But it's much harder to say "Sure, I'll risk losing my 40 year old restaurant, my income, my house and family, to protest this mask law!"

They've gotten very good at squeezing the right people by the balls to keep all of us in line.