2174
Comments (139)
sorted by:
75
BasedMedicalDoctor 75 points ago +76 / -1

Slut

63
GEOTUSMAGA 63 points ago +63 / -0

Worse: a gross slut. They weren't even good nudes.

53
TakenusernameA 53 points ago +53 / -0

Theyre like anti-nudes. I would pay her to put on clothing .

17
FliesTheFlag 17 points ago +20 / -3

⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣤⠖⠚⠉⠉⠳⣦⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⣀⡀⢀⢀⢀⣀⣀ ⢀⢀⢀⡴⢋⣀⡀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢻⣷⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⠇⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣠⣾⠿⠛⠉⠁⢀⣴⡟⠁⢀⡇⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣠⣤ ⢀⢀⠎⣰⣿⠿⣿⡄⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⡆⢀⢀⢀⢀⣾⡿⢀⢀⢀⢀⡀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣰⡟⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⣾⡟⢀⢀⢀⡟⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⣿⡿ ⢀⠏⢰⣿⡟⢀⣿⡇⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⡇⢀⢀⢀⢮⣿⠇⢀⢀⢠⠞⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢰⠏⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⠁⢀⢀⢸⠇⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⣿⠃ ⡜⢀⣾⡿⠃⢠⣿⠁⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⠁⢀⢀⢊⣿⡟⢀⢀⡰⠃⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡿⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣾⣿⠇⢀⢀⢠⠏⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⣿⡟ ⡇⢀⠋⢀⢀⣾⡏⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⡏⢀⠠⠃⣾⣿⠇⢀⡴⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡇⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⣿⡟⢀⢀⣰⠋⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⣿⠁ ⠹⣄⣀⣤⣿⠟⢀⢀⢀⣾⣿⡟⢀⡐⠁⣼⣿⡟⢀⡰⣡⣶⡶⣆⢀⢀⣀⣀⢀⢀⣀⣀⢀⢀⣀⣀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢷⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⠃⣠⠞⢁⣴⣶⣠⣶⡆⢀⢀⢀⣠⣶⣶⣰⣿⡏ ⢀⠈⠉⠉⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⣿⡟⠁⠄⢀⢰⣿⣿⠃⣰⣿⣿⠏⢀⣿⢀⣸⣿⠏⢀⢸⣿⠃⢀⣼⣿⠇⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠑⢀⢠⣿⣿⣿⠋⠁⣰⣿⡟⠁⣿⣿⢀⢀⢀⣴⣿⠟⢀⣿⡿ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⣿⠟⡀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⡟⢠⣿⣿⡟⢀⣰⠇⢀⣿⡿⢀⢀⣿⡏⢀⢰⣿⡏⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢰⣿⣿⠃⢀⣼⣿⡟⢀⣸⣿⠃⢀⢀⣼⣿⡏⢀⣼⣿⠃ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣼⡿⠋⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⠃⣿⣿⣿⠁⣰⠏⢀⣼⣿⠃⢀⣾⡿⢀⢠⣿⡟⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⡏⢀⣰⣿⣿⠁⢠⣿⡏⢀⢀⣸⣿⡿⢀⢰⣿⠇ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣾⣟⠕⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⡿⠊⠁⣰⢣⣿⡟⢀⣰⣿⠃⢀⣾⣿⠁⡼⢀⢀⢀⣰⡾⠿⠿⣿⣶⣦⣾⣿⡟⢀⢀⣿⣿⡇⢀⣾⡿⢀⡞⢰⣿⣿⠇⢠⣿⡟⢠⡏ ⢀⢀⢀⢠⣾⡿⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⠃⣿⣿⢀⢀⡴⠃⣾⣿⣧⣰⣿⣿⣄⣾⣿⣧⡼⠁⢀⢀⢀⣿⢀⢀⢀⢀⢹⣿⣿⣟⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣧⣾⣿⣷⡾⠁⣼⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⣷⡟ ⢀⢀⢀⠟⠉⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠻⠋⢀⢿⣿⣶⠟⠁⢀⠻⣿⡿⠛⣿⣿⠏⢿⣿⠟⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⠘⠦⣤⣤⡶⠟⢻⣿⣿⢀⢀⠘⣿⣿⠋⢿⣿⠟⢀⢀⠸⣿⡿⠋⣿⣿⠏ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢿⣿⣇⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⣠⣤⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⢿⣿⣆⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣠⡤⠶⠛⠛⠛⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄ ⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠙⠿⣷⣤⣤⠶⠞⠋⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⠻⠛⠉⠉⠉⠙⠂

12
Coprolite 12 points ago +12 / -0

Is that braille?

6
CucksForTheDonald 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. :) You can just select one of the characters and search for it:

Braille Pattern Dots-12347 (U+284F)

Impressive!

7
independentbystander 7 points ago +7 / -0

WEW LAD

-6
CelesteD -6 points ago +2 / -8

You know you misspelled "whew", right?

4
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only reason she isn't plastered all over the interwebs is because she's part of the favored political party. Just like Stacey Plaskett.

5
CharlesDemar72 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you ever noticed that most people who take nudes (or go to nude beaches) are those no one wants to see nude in the first place?

2
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol I know right.

I mean, if I was wasted, I'd tap it but I'd feel shame afterwards.

4
GEOTUSMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, the Vespa/Piaggio fuck. Fun to ride, but don't let your friends see you on it.

34
giantrabbit1 [S] 34 points ago +34 / -0

Also ethical violations up the wazoo...she fucked a staffer.

4
Carry_Your_Name 4 points ago +13 / -9

I thought she was just brushing her hair? Creepy, yeah, but .... meh.

Also, on a side note, I have a STRAIGHT and narrow definition of the F word, which is a dick going in and out of a pussy. That makes it physically impossible for two men or two women to do it.

6
indigo_truther 6 points ago +7 / -1

molested?

1
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a clam slam.

Shortly after followed by a snail trail on that chair.

-1
christianknight -1 points ago +2 / -3

Let me guess...whamyn cant do bad right?

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +4 / -1

They can do all evil under heaven, they just can't F#$k. Screwing with finger, tongue or a dildo is not f%&k. It may be a gross sex act, but it's not f#$k. It's not two becoming one flesh. If you call that [email protected]!k, then you have been corrupted by the LGBT agenda.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im not thinking gay. Im thinking this is the nonsense that results in laws saying woken cant rape but men can. And tradcons love backing those.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's no nonsense. Acquiring carnal knowledge of a woman has been the legal definition of rape for centuries until leftists changed it - to protect some young boys from gay men, perhaps? Idk. These years since the #MeToo movement they're further expanding the definition to count consensual sex which the woman later regrets as rape as well. That is real nonsense.

2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stand by my statement. Our laws are backwards and unduly benefit females.

0
YOLOSwag_McFartnut 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's not two becoming one flesh

It is in the back door. You want some fuck?

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +3 / -1

Back door is made for sh!tting, not f#$king. There's a million ways to have some fun and you choose the grossest.

1
CoffeeIsForClosers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for making "wazoo" great again.

8
TommyLasordasBallBag 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Every time my wife comes out with a hairbrush, I ask her "who did you bring over? Hehe"

  • Dave Landau
2
nocomply55 2 points ago +2 / -0

HAHAHA I just came on to post "slut." My good fren beat me to it.

47
Acidflux 47 points ago +47 / -0

Judge Yolanda Orozco sided with the Daily Mail on Wednesday, finding that the photos were a matter of public concern, according to The Orange County Register.

Lmao.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
45
xBigCoffinHunter 45 points ago +45 / -0

I should sue the Daily Mail for making me look at that fucking nightmare.

15
War_Hamster 15 points ago +15 / -0

The judge has ruled you have standing.

10
booblitchutz 10 points ago +10 / -0

Coincidentally after looking at Katie’s nudes, I was left with nothing standing.

4
Southboundanddown 4 points ago +4 / -0

Underrated comment.

1
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 1 point ago +1 / -0

KEK

12
Mountaineer 12 points ago +12 / -0

Kek

7
_Cabal_ 7 points ago +7 / -0

Cannot be unseen.

5
the-new-style 5 points ago +5 / -0

They had to pay Melania $150m for calling her a prostitute.

1
OldHickoryJackson 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sauce?

3
the-new-style 3 points ago +3 / -0

Select my text and search using it

4
Norma_Bates 4 points ago +4 / -0

I smell a class action lawsuit

32
p1smo 32 points ago +32 / -0

If she wasn’t having sex with a staffer, which is a blatant violation of house ethics, she might have a case, but the judge is right about this being public interest and it speaking directly to her ability to perform her duties.

5
muslimporn 5 points ago +6 / -1

A lot of this reminds of Prince Charle's talking dirty on the phone wanting to be Camilla's tampon. A lot of people I talk to believe that's a matter of public interest because they are really just spiteful and jealous.

These are people who claim to be into human rights but quickly abandon the concept when it comes to those they are prejudiced against. I'm no fan of royalty but if you're going to start stripping them of a basic right to privacy and become a voyeur for self gratification then where does that end?

I believe in the case of Charles it at least had some public interest that he was having an affair and as a future monarch is expected to adhere to the highest standards of personal conduct. Had it only been his activities beneath the sheets which are private it might have been less ambiguous.

There have to be some standards and a line somewhere. Otherwise you'll have journalists bugging bedrooms and putting secret cameras in toilets when it comes to people they don't like.

6
whippeat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Prince Charle's talking dirty on the phone wanting to be Camilla's tampon.

Rofl. Seriously?

Charles, you dirty boy

And you’d think Camilla is a bit too old for tampons, to be honest

4
muslimporn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Presumably she was much younger thirty odd years ago...

CAMILLA: Mmm, so do I. I need you all the week. All the time. CHARLES: Oh, God. I’ll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier! CAMILLA (laughing): What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? (Both laugh). Oh, you’re going to come back as a pair of knickers. CHARLES: Or, God forbid, a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs) CAMILLA: You are a complete idiot! (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea. CHARLES: My luck to be chucked down a lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down. CAMILLA (laughing): Oh darling! CHARLES: Until the next one comes through. CAMILLA: Oh, perhaps you could just come back as a box. CHARLES: What sort of box? CAMILLA: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going. CHARLES: That’s true. CAMILLA: Repeating yourself … (laughing). Oh, darling, oh I just want you now.

11
FireannDireach 11 points ago +11 / -0

I remember reading that, when it first came out, and thinking "That's the least sexy dirty talk I've ever read."

9
dorsalmorsel 9 points ago +9 / -0

The least sexy talk you have ever read is those between Jeff Bezos and his NFL groupie girlfriend. So lame. So very very lame.

" I want to get drunk with you (but not too drunk)"

FFS

2
airborne3502 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I could unread that.

3
CharlesDemar72 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah 30 years ago she was 60.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +2 / -1

He was so horny that he couldn’t give her a coitus hiatus at that time of the month!

17
FuckU/Spez 17 points ago +17 / -0

Sorry for your feefees... 😭😭😭

14
Carry_Your_Name 14 points ago +14 / -0

Remember that she called it a "throuple" and perhaps popularized the term? See, that was corruption of the language in real time. When a main chick and a side chick are both involved in a sexual relationship, if it's a one off act in bed then call it a threesome, if it's a long time affair then call it a love triangle. WTF is a "throuple"? I guess we've already known the answer. Since it's a fusion of "three" and "couple", apparently it's an attempt to destroy monogamy and legitimize polygamy.

5
KangKong 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was seeing the term used on Fox News in the weeks leading up to the scandal. Weird.

5
Carry_Your_Name 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hmm, writings on the wall.

11
OPsMom 11 points ago +11 / -0

All nudes are of public concern

11
pray_for_kekistan 11 points ago +11 / -0

username checks out

5
StartAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL

6
Comanche_Moon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Truth! Just ask Chuck Schumer. He wanted nudes of President Trump.

1
IlhanOmarsFagBrother 1 point ago +1 / -0

So did Adam Shit

11
slowmotrin 11 points ago +11 / -0

"This ruling has huge implications for any woman that wants to run for office"

You may want to think twice in about promoting only fans as something that every woman should do.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Such a hilarious comment. Every woman who runs for office has nudes floating around of her? Is in a fucked up “throuple” relationship with a staffer? Such woketarded bullshit!

10
Jsmitty112 10 points ago +10 / -0

She’s probably making a living off of Onlyfans right now. Change my mind...

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

How?

1
SCP0073 1 point ago +1 / -0

The amount of weak men will astound you.

8
tellittothedead1 8 points ago +8 / -0

I WONDER IF SHE'S STILL SINGLE?

3
Aenima1 3 points ago +3 / -0

At least we know she’s fun 🤩

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blondes have more fun

7
kompromatdotwin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Do you like our goat?

https://media.patriots.win/post/E3ZKYCNU.png (nsfw)

7
2
h3xAd3c1m4L 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did anyone really ever get to see the full uncensored ones?

3
Coprolite 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure the censure covered up anything really interesting. Who is the chick getting her hair brushed?

1
NOTWOKE 1 point ago +1 / -0

The staffer

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why? Why would you want to?

2
Blue_Country_Refugee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yah but they all turned to pillars of salt

1
Siteless_Vagrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, they were out there. I had 'em on one of the old image hoster we used, forget the one but it's gone now. Never saved 'em to the drive.

4
Bristol_Is_My_Wifey 4 points ago +4 / -0

She looks alright from the back, not so good from the front

2
reagan2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

That don't look bad.

2
h3xAd3c1m4L 2 points ago +2 / -0

I only just realized there’s actually a goat there

7
KangKong 7 points ago +7 / -0

I should sue her for having had to look at those sad titties.

6
SteelWolf87 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wish I had two more hands so I could give them titties 4 thumbs down.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

THE MILKS GONE SOUR!

7
BloodDe 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tossed because no one looked

5
China4Biden 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just looked up Katie Hill's nudes. Not fap worthy.

5
Carry_Your_Name 5 points ago +5 / -0

See, Washington is called Hollywood for UGLY people for a reason. Those tiny muffins and flabby tummy, combined with the crackpot and the nazi tattoo on her midriff, are a huge turn off.

4
ColonelTravis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cue The Price is Right incorrect choice sound,

4
Cyber1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Completely forgot she even existed.

4
noonthirty 4 points ago +4 / -0

How about you don't take nasty nudes, especially if you look like Katie Hill?

4
BostonVoter 4 points ago +4 / -0

She is mentally ill

4
Coolgenner 4 points ago +6 / -2

I’d fuck her one time, dirty cock socket that she is.

5
noonthirty 5 points ago +5 / -0

You should go to a classy hooker instead.

3
HrshySqrt77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dr. Jill? Nm. You said classy

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same same

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
A1waysLurk1ing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's some gossip for y'all:

THE NEW WORLD ORDER, AKA "THE DEEP STATE TM", ARE IN FACT AMERICAN ROBBER BARON PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS.

5
TakenusernameA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its more complicated than that. Its a corporatists union between big business and big bureaucracy to crush the little guy.

3
BidenTouchedMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the Daily Mail article it said she attempted suicide. Try better next time dummy. Fucking deviant.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes... of course she did...

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Her statement went straight to the Feminism card. Imagine my shock.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Feminism” is dead and buried, dug up, shat upon and tossed into a ditch and has been picked clean by buzzards.

Trans movement killed feminism.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't stop them from pulling the card when it suits.

Also, I'm looking forward to seeing future studies about how a minuscule minority like Tranny's were able to exert so much control over so many. They figured out the victim heirarchy game and hijacked it. Gotta give them credit.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a tool to weaken men. A salvo in the culture war. The object is to topple western civilization.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

History repeats.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feminism is the Whore of Great Babylon with blasphemous names written all over her body. Yeah I know she's supposed to represent all the pagan religions on earth according to mainstream theological interpretation, but if you want a graphic image of that, then there're naked sluts literally looking like that in some weird performance art, and there're celebrities wearing a skin tight suit like that in some a red carpet photos.

2
RalphieRabbit_pinkni 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the tatoo?

3
Liam_Clancy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Iron cross kind of shape.

2
supermansundies 2 points ago +2 / -0

they should still be punished for releasing photos of her disgusting naked body

2
VikingHalo45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Slut

2
yunarukami 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a disgusting pervert.

2
MAGADUDE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Link to pics? I am a sick puppy. Link please.

2
Slothboy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha I forgot about that

1
B1ueCo11ar 1 point ago +1 / -0

The headline should be ****"democrats lawyer calls somone perverted" the faint sound of laughter could be heard from multiple directions.

1
yellowandrose 1 point ago +1 / -0

nasty skank should be sued for being gross

1
Dontdoxxxmeplease 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nude photos u say.

1
womp_squared 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no! That sucks!

1
SophiesBoyfriend 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember when her own far-left staffers took over her twitter account to accuse her of sexual assault in the workplace?

Fantastic to see that CA25 has been Republican controlled since...

1
OldHickoryJackson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn’t this the whore Gaetz backed up that just threw him under the bus last week?

Karma’s a bitch.

1
c2sky 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did she expect? Anthony Weiner's dick pics were published everywhere.

1
Praetor_Sean 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course she posted those photos herself, so kind of hard to call them leaked. Also if anyone should sue it is anyone who saw the horror that is Katie Hill nude.

1
16BeatsAOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like Rep. Flapjacks is out of luck. 🤣

1
UltraFrogMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is she the one who boinked a staffer

1
we_won_the_war_jack 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a whore.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL

1
nocomply55 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's actually logical given the totally debased state of our culture that this woman ultimately tried to rebrand herself and save her political future by embracing being what is essentially a porno whore. Go do some coke, garbage.

1
NecessaryOcelot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just the fact her naked photos are loose in the wild is punishment enough for all of us.

1
SteelWolf87 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now do AOC 😅

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GodKingHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

#THOTAUDIT

1
For_All_Mankind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thot patrolled

0
Chickenwing 0 points ago +9 / -9

She’s right. This is actually really bad.

You shouldn’t be able to post someone else’s nudes.

10
UsernameWasTaken 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don’t know how much you know about this story, but it’s more complicated than that. First of all they technically did the bare minimum to censor her nudes. Second of all, she posted at least some of those pictures herself online. Third they were supporting evidence to prove allegations the article made about her inappropriate sexual behavior with a staffer. And fourth the photos show that she has a tattoo that exposes her for being a hypocrite for stances she’s taken in the past. (To say nothing about the part involving the drugs)

I suppose the alternative would have been to write an article exposing corruption and then say (anonymous sources say…) and hope people just believe it. It’s another to bring the receipts and say here’s all the evidence. Photos, text messages, etc. she’s a corrupt politician who’s abusing her power.

If this was a case of a newspaper publishing revenge porn I would 100% agree that it would be inappropriate, but I think this is more grey and I personally fall on the side of saying that evil people should be exposed (no pun intended)

1
HrshySqrt77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree with what you say, but that iron cross tattoo is the least offensive thing in her pictures.

3
Coprolite 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tend to agree however she is a elected public official now. It is virtually impossible to slander or libel a elected public official. All the perks of holding a public office have a price.

3
ObongoForPrison2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t take nudes in the fashion Katie Hill did.

4
TakenusernameA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dont take nudes period. Especially if they violate the geneva conventions.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least don't keep any digital form of it. Take a Canon or Polaroid picture instead.

-5
Chaospyke -5 points ago +2 / -7

She might be a brain-dead leftist, but its not cool that her nudes were propagated like that against her will. The knowledge/fact that she had nudes is public knowledge, the pics themselves, not so much.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

She and her dirtbag husband posted those nudes themselves on a public forum seeking sex partners. It’s not like she was hacked or anything like that!

1
Chaospyke 1 point ago +1 / -0

That does change things. I didn't know the circumstances behind how her nudes got out.