17
With the news from denver: What, if any, amount of adverse reactions - from facial paralysis, to pregnancy problems, to actual deaths would create a threshold for the benevolent, caring government to say, "We're putting a freeze on vaccinations until we figure out what's going on here."?
posted ago by FredRedd ago by FredRedd +17 / -0

For that matter, why are people still scrambling like lemmings over a cliff to get a "vaccine" that has so many adverse reactions?

7 comments
7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (7)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 5 ▼
– Thunderbolt45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Short of 10,000 deaths within a month or so, nothing will convince them to freeze vaccinations.

As for your other question, it's simple. The media has oversold the virus and undersold the vaccine side effects. A lot of people believe the virus is going to kill them, or at the very least, leave them with lifelong health issues. Those same people believe the vaccine is totally safe or that the side effects have been very minor and isolated.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FredRedd [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're getting to the point where the Mods should just give every post the "Clown World, "HONK HONK" Flair.

permalink parent save report block reply