His analogy was perfect - he was discussing the headlines that contradict what is actually happening in the Chauvin case, and in many instances, explicitly contradict the story they are attached to.
If the person only "heard" (read) the "commentary" (headlines) and didn't have other information to go by, they would be convinced that the outcome is unexpected when the fight result is announced.
Did you eat paint chips as a child, or are you just not fucking good at reading comprehension?
He isn't discussing the merits of the case, but rather the bad coverage by the press and the unwillingness of the majority of the population to do their own research instead of being fed their fucking opinion on a spoon by activist media.
His analogy was perfect - he was discussing the headlines that contradict what is actually happening in the Chauvin case, and in many instances, explicitly contradict the story they are attached to.
If the person only "heard" (read) the "commentary" (headlines) and didn't have other information to go by, they would be convinced that the outcome is unexpected when the fight result is announced.
Except there’s video evidence, so no, that cucked fake-news faggots analogy wasn’t perfect.
Did you eat paint chips as a child, or are you just not fucking good at reading comprehension?
He isn't discussing the merits of the case, but rather the bad coverage by the press and the unwillingness of the majority of the population to do their own research instead of being fed their fucking opinion on a spoon by activist media.
Balding is masculine