I can understand being on the fence. That's what a good, rational person should do. However, I don't see how you are still "having more and more reasonable doubt" and haven't concluded that this is a farce and the person who should be on trial is the drug dealer. That's where I've landed after the drug dealer that convinced him to swallow the pills to hide them pled the 5th.
Prosecution's own witness backfires, because he admit Chauvin could have used more force. Tasers can be lethal, but less lethal than guns.
I was on the fence about this case at the start. I keep having more and more reasonable doubt.
The "intent to kill" wouldn't you have used a taser?
I can understand being on the fence. That's what a good, rational person should do. However, I don't see how you are still "having more and more reasonable doubt" and haven't concluded that this is a farce and the person who should be on trial is the drug dealer. That's where I've landed after the drug dealer that convinced him to swallow the pills to hide them pled the 5th.
I feel like the only reason they'd convict him at this point is because they don't want riots and people showing up at their home. Other than that,