That is my understanding as well, so I am curious to why the title doesn’t reflect that, and instead makes it appear that constitutional amendments are at stake, unless it’s merely agitprop.
Biden's trying to use executive orders to restrict gun rights therefore bypassing the protections of the constitution. His defense of this action is "no amendment is absolute." But they do absolutely prohibit him from doing the very thing he is ordering. That's the core of the issue. He's not amending the constitution, he's saying despite the amendment protecting those rights he has the sole authority to restrict those amendments.
That is my understanding as well, so I am curious to why the title doesn’t reflect that, and instead makes it appear that constitutional amendments are at stake, unless it’s merely agitprop.
Biden's trying to use executive orders to restrict gun rights therefore bypassing the protections of the constitution. His defense of this action is "no amendment is absolute." But they do absolutely prohibit him from doing the very thing he is ordering. That's the core of the issue. He's not amending the constitution, he's saying despite the amendment protecting those rights he has the sole authority to restrict those amendments.
Gotcha. Context is everything.