What's that about guns? I must have missed that. I don't watch the news. (Wink wink). I live in an area where I hear gun shots at least once a week...I'm sure they are going to follow any EO's...........................................NOT!
Because amendments are fluid, and you can just use the gun show loophole, and then there's the assault pistols that are basically short barrel rifles, and.................
LOL you fags. They are passing laws and taking guns. While youdo nothing. In between microwaved hotpockets and faggoty "come and take them" and "boat accident ha-ha" broken record lines. Bunch. Of. Fags.
Why is it that we make fun of Ted Cruz’s “sternly worded letters,” but everybody is freaking the fuck out over sternly worded letters from Biden?
EO’s aren’t legally binding, except in areas where the President has that power enumerated in the Constitution. That’s why President Trump’s travel ban EO was eventually instated, but his bump stock ban was thrown out. Immigration control is the purview of the executive branch, but creating new gun laws is not.
As soon as any of these get challenged in court they’re done-zo.
Which came a little too late for the thousands (millions?) of people who were forced to either surrender their bump stocks to the police, or to destroy their own property.
We could speculate about whether bump stock owners chose to take their chances with law enforcement, to hide their bump stocks rather than getting rid of them, but the point is, they all faced legal problems if they were caught with them after Trump's diktat.
I most certainly DID vote Trump.....twice. Disagreeing with a policy /= not voting for someone. The only person whose political positions align perfectly with mine is.....ME.
GOA fought the bump stock ban because it was unconstitutional. Does it matter who did the unconstitutional thing?
The Constitution specifically states that ex post facto laws are not allowed.
Making a perfectly legal hunk of plastic ILLEGAL one day, is an example of an ex post facto law. Worse, the ban constituted an illegal taking. What were bump stock owners to do? Either surrender their formerly legal hunks of plastic to the police, or destroy them. NO compensation was offered.
The government has the power of eminent domain, to take your property to build a highway on ramp, or a hospital, or a border wall, for example. Yes, government can take your property, but it MUST compensate the property owner for what is taken. That didn't happen, did it?
This is going to blow up in Biden's face. Metaphorically speaking..
Not metaphorically, at all. The first person to try real gun control with confiscation will END this country, as we know it.
We are far too laid back about our freedoms being stripped from us, but gun control is one subject most people consider the line.
Biden sucks cocks
And his son loves playing with his
Little pee wee 7-year-old cocks.
They took everything else. They're feeling bold
I wish they would go ahead and ban all guns. We would finally see who is a real American and who would comply.
Just ignore that shit. Ignore Bidens full of shit EO's.
What's that about guns? I must have missed that. I don't watch the news. (Wink wink). I live in an area where I hear gun shots at least once a week...I'm sure they are going to follow any EO's...........................................NOT!
Fuck him. He cant write law. Lets get this over with.
It’s being only a couple of months and things are already this bad. By 2024 this country will be unrecognisable
A foot in the door to be expanded later on- Totalitarian 101 just like Mao, Hitler and Stalin
Bring
It
On
Because amendments are fluid, and you can just use the gun show loophole, and then there's the assault pistols that are basically short barrel rifles, and.................
You can't restrict something that doesn't exist.
LOL you fags. They are passing laws and taking guns. While youdo nothing. In between microwaved hotpockets and faggoty "come and take them" and "boat accident ha-ha" broken record lines. Bunch. Of. Fags.
Why is it that we make fun of Ted Cruz’s “sternly worded letters,” but everybody is freaking the fuck out over sternly worded letters from Biden?
EO’s aren’t legally binding, except in areas where the President has that power enumerated in the Constitution. That’s why President Trump’s travel ban EO was eventually instated, but his bump stock ban was thrown out. Immigration control is the purview of the executive branch, but creating new gun laws is not.
As soon as any of these get challenged in court they’re done-zo.
"....but his bump stock ban was thrown out."
Which came a little too late for the thousands (millions?) of people who were forced to either surrender their bump stocks to the police, or to destroy their own property.
We could speculate about whether bump stock owners chose to take their chances with law enforcement, to hide their bump stocks rather than getting rid of them, but the point is, they all faced legal problems if they were caught with them after Trump's diktat.
(edit: I didn't down vote your post, FWIW)
GOA faggots like you are why Biden is in the WH. You faggots didn't vote for Trump and we blame you first and foremost because of "muh bump stocks".
Wait. Whut?
I most certainly DID vote Trump.....twice. Disagreeing with a policy /= not voting for someone. The only person whose political positions align perfectly with mine is.....ME.
GOA fought the bump stock ban because it was unconstitutional. Does it matter who did the unconstitutional thing?
The Constitution specifically states that ex post facto laws are not allowed.
Making a perfectly legal hunk of plastic ILLEGAL one day, is an example of an ex post facto law. Worse, the ban constituted an illegal taking. What were bump stock owners to do? Either surrender their formerly legal hunks of plastic to the police, or destroy them. NO compensation was offered.
The government has the power of eminent domain, to take your property to build a highway on ramp, or a hospital, or a border wall, for example. Yes, government can take your property, but it MUST compensate the property owner for what is taken. That didn't happen, did it?
Damnit Anaconda.....
You assume the courts will uphold the constitution. I doubt your assumption is correct.