29
Comments (17)
sorted by:
3
SqueakyDolphin [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

What my doctor said:

it is like a lot of other papers that exist that have reasonable and plausible speculations about possible adverse long-term effects of this type of vaccine. The answer is that we just do not know as it is too early in this very complex and evolving situation to ascertain these things…no one fully knows and so we must speculate as accurately and scientifically as possible...and it is in this atmosphere of a serious pandemic with rushed vaccines and the fact that we are early on in this developing/unfolding situation as to how well the vaccines may work, it is within this atmosphere that vaccine hesitancy that seems reasonable, i.e., the cautionary principle seems appropriate. What becomes difficult is how to balance our response to a vaccine within a health care system that seemingly pays little to no attention to remediating the co-morbidities that are driving the severity of this pandemic and instead relies on medicines/vaccines totally when in all reality we need both approaches. Since the reduction or remediation of co-morbidities is NOT taking place (and we have had plenty of time to make a serious dent in these epidemic health issues), then a vaccine becomes more urgent and advisable, even with all of the unknowns. What I am trying to say is that I can understand and relate to the need for the vaccine, and I can understand and relate to the hesitancy. In the long run, it is up to each one of us to get as informed as possible and make our decision. So, for you and virtually everyone else too, evaluating and considering with your unique health status and concerns, is getting Covid-19 more risky than the vaccine? If you can answer that question then you have your answer.

1
PlatinumFMorgan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you ask him if he believes all that bullshit that just came out of his mouth?

2
SqueakyDolphin [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is the leader in functional medicine in the mid-Atlantic and reading his reviews he fixed people that the Mayo Clinic and John’s Hopkins couldn’t so #ibelievehim

2
PlatinumFMorgan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough.

2
SqueakyDolphin [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

But that’s the first thing I sent to him I will send some more. Have a good day friend

1
MrGone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me put what you said a little simpler.

If they fuck this up no one will ever take a Jab for vaccinations again. Hopefully.

1
MAGAsian 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is all bullshit. Stop spreading this nonsense. Go to Qtard forums.

1
SqueakyDolphin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for your comment. I welcome your opinion because I’m an American.

1
Muffinman 1 point ago +1 / -0

My doc told me that my risk of complications from COVID was less than the risk of complications from the vaccine, based on current evidence. I'm young-ish and in pretty good health, so if I get covid, I should be fine.

With the vaccine still in long-term clinical trials, he recommended that I wait until after they are completed and the results are published before getting it.

However I have a suspicion that my work is going to require it at some point... so I guess I better prepare myself to leave my job.

1
SqueakyDolphin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stand up for your rights. Forced vaccination is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath and vaccine passports are a violation of HIPAA https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-individuals/medical-records/index.html

1
MrGone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. 25% decrees in population by...I think they said 2040? Correct me if my dates off.

1
SqueakyDolphin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course it’s important to view everything in the context of its entirety but he did say “First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.” https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript

1
MrGone 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Not gates.

It was a study about the American population.

1
SqueakyDolphin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a source?

1
MrGone 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I did I wouldn't have asked.

I just re read the quote the other day but the study was a few years back. I remember it because everyone was like, where the hell did they get that number? I suspect we're seeing the plan coming to fruition.

1
SqueakyDolphin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it the successor to agenda 21? I’m not sure I’ll look

1
MrGone 1 point ago +1 / -0

My memory isn't that good.