570
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

It might seem counterintuitive for them to vaccine poison the populace that complies, but they get rid of the useful idiots first after they gain power. They know these purple haired fatties and guys dressed like women and soy boys in skinny jeans aren't going to do the work needed to keep society functioning in their depopulation "great reset", where the elites try to rule over what's left.

It's also why Bill Gates bought soo much farmland that he is the single largest owner of farmland in the USA. When society collapses, there might be an abundance of open land everywhere, but due to soo few people, resources and supply lines will need to be consolidated, because you're not going to effectively disseminate resources society needs when you have only a few people here and there. So by controlling soo much farmland, he can build infrastructure around it that forces people under his wing to get access to those resources.

He really thinks by initiating the great reset, he's going to be remembered as some founding father heralding in a new era for humanity, after having committed mass genocide. He think's 100 years from now there's going to be a hall with a revered painting of him in it.


3
HanginChad 3 points ago +3 / -0

The opposing theory is that the mass vaccination will cause the virus to mutate into a more deadly virus and only the vaccinated will survive. Something like Marek's disease in chickens.

Does Vegas have odds on how Bill Gates wipes out humanity?

4
schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Viruses generally become less lethal as they mutate. If it kills all the people, the virus can no longer replicate.

3
HanginChad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not when there is a mass vaccination happening. This is evident in Marek's disease and what Geert Vanden Bossche is saying.

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/