1872
Fact ! (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Scottish_Patriot ago by Scottish_Patriot +1874 / -2
Comments (90)
sorted by:
45
throwaway777 45 points ago +48 / -3

Its not a new virus, its a new marketing campaign on an old product.

19
Scottish_Patriot [S] 19 points ago +21 / -2

True, but you get the point right ? Nit picking can be used after the main facts are exposed :) peace

9
MustBeTrump 9 points ago +12 / -3

The point is a little bit ignorant but I get it.

It helps to be absolutely solid on ALL the facts in a post like this, otherwise they'll discredit the whole post by pointing out that 1% of it is slightly inaccurate. Also helps Facebook but fake news disclaimers on posts if there's a slight inaccuracy.

5
Scottish_Patriot [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

I get your point, however, in these troubled times, a light hearted dig at their agenda is welcomed, anyone suggesting otherwise should consider. The fact checkers having to publish and promote their „facts“ are pointing the way, red-pilling as they go. Some simple google searches now pull up these arguments they try to debunk, to people that has no idea there was that theory/ debate, I think they’re subconsciously red pilling and people questioning narratives much more.. hold the live

4
pente1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

A virus so dangerous and deadly, that it needs a marketing campaign to create fear.

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

They just scared people and they are paying attention for the first time.

They did all of this with a cold.

Can you imagine if the media did this with a bad flu season, where young people actually die and more people are symptomatic?

22
Womb___Raider 22 points ago +25 / -3

Cancer isn't a virus.

8
Scottish_Patriot [S] 8 points ago +13 / -5

Quote „ An estimated 15 percent of all human cancers worldwide may be attributed to viruses [1], representing a significant portion of the global cancer burden. Both DNA and RNA viruses have been shown to be capable of causing cancer in humans.“

10
Womb___Raider 10 points ago +12 / -2

"may be attributed to" that "may" leaves a lot of ambiguity.

The quote also says "shown to be capable" which isn't exactly pinning the cause of cancer either.

7
Archmagnus 7 points ago +7 / -0

still more relevant and dangerous than wu flu though

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nah, the overall risk is obviously over blown, but it does have a high mortality rate for people around 70. There is reason to be concerned, but the right move would have been to sequester the old and morbidly obese, and let the young people get it so that herd immunity was built.

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only mortality rate is for the elderly. It's a bad cold and it does happen regularly. Nobody paid attention to seasonal illnesses until the media told them too.

I'm just glad they did this with a bad cold instead of a bad flu, a bad flu would have many more people with actual symptoms plus we would have young people dying. Shit would be a lot worse for us.

On the plus side, people are actually washing their hands now which should have a net positive effect on illnesses.

4
Scottish_Patriot [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

That we are still discussing it is what I meant! Thx

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

HPV causes cancer.

It's a pretty common virus and most never know they have it.

Damaging a cell can cause cancer.

2
randomusers239874 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just to clarify that quote, that is 15% of types of cancer, not 15% of cases of cancer. Very important distinction.

1
50_stars_for_freedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cancer is a lack of health. Cell replication problems in rebuilding organs. Cell replacement is normal. Failing organs or toxic or unhealthy body arrives at cancer.

1
stagolee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, in that case we have an HPV vaccine which will prevent cervical cancer caused by that virus. There are in fact some vaccines coming online that fight viruses that cause cancer. However, the original point stands as well - cancer isn't a virus. It wasn't a good mention in this context.

1
50_stars_for_freedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gardasil has tons of known side effects. Very easy to find.

5
AnointedVisions 5 points ago +7 / -2

Cancer is going to be hard to beat. It's literally our own bodies

6
giggitybooped 6 points ago +6 / -0

No it's not. Joe biden is president now. He promised on the campaign trail that "I promise you, if you vote for me, we're gonna cure cancer."

Totally wasn't the worst pander for votes ever. We got a cure incoming!!!

2
MapleBaconWaffles 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's literally our own bodies

if you vote for me, we're gonna cure cancer.

Maybe this is a cancer vaccine.

2
remember1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you stop a cell from mutating. If you can answer that question, congratulations, you’ve cured cancer. Maybe my uncle would still be alive.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

well dead cells can't mutate.

1
remember1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's one way of going about a solution. But then which pancreatic cells do you kill, and which do you let live?

1
HillarysBustedDonut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many different types of cancers are caused by many different types of viruses. HPV and SV40 are two well known examples. New research shows that cancers are caused by mRNA malfunctions and not DNA malfunctions. Viruses are strands of RNA with a protein shell around them.

https://www.mskcc.org/news/scientists-find-cancer-drivers-hiding-rna-not-dna

(disregard the FaCt ChEcK that says mRNA shots definitely do not cause cancer since there is no possible way they could know that yet.)

16
thelastlast 16 points ago +16 / -0

cancer is like a million different things causing unchecked cell growth grouped into one category, it's not a single pathogen.

that said, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they had a cure. not sure there is a more ruthless or psychotic business than Pharm right now.

3
Scottish_Patriot [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I don’t claim to know anything about it, just liked the original statement and made sense - the sheep need it spelled out in layman’s terms IMO

2
thelastlast 2 points ago +3 / -1

the sheep are not coming over to our side no matter how we spell it out. we're fucked. kiss freedom goodbye.

5
Scottish_Patriot [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey doomer- cheer up- it’s gaining traction- time will reveal if your hopefully wrong and I and the rest who battled the storm and stayed the course, prevail! You can celebrate with us !

2
thelastlast 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will brother.

but im doomin hard right now, no lie

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

The rock will never wear down no matter how much water you pour on it.

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are probably cures for many cancers. I do know that most are survivable of caught early.

My mom had breast cancer last year, they found it early enough that the doctor told her it was nothing to worry about. Cut the tumor out, some radiation, and a prescription was what it took to fix her right up

1
projectarcturus1 1 point ago +1 / -0

My oncologist told me that cancer is cells that refuse to die.

1
thelastlast 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's one type, yes. it essentially accomplishes the same thing.

1
stagolee 1 point ago +1 / -0

a million different causes create a million different cancers and there will be a million different cures. That's part of what makes it so difficult.

-4
AnointedVisions -4 points ago +1 / -5

Weed dude and dmt joe rogan tain by day cuck shit all night all day!

7
romanhelmet 7 points ago +9 / -2

Let get this straight.

It's NOT a vaccine...it's GENE THERAPY.

You are getting shot up with mRNA that your body processes to product shit that it normally does not and NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE LONG TERM EFECTS WILL BE

0
randomusers239874 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's not gene therapy, because no genetic code is inserted into your genome. Gene therapy has a very specific definition; please don't spread falsehoods when there are plenty of real reasons to decline the vaccine.

0
romanhelmet 0 points ago +2 / -2

**Gene Therapy Definition from NIH: **

Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease. In the future, this technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patient’s cells instead of using drugs or surgery. Researchers are testing several approaches to gene therapy, including:

Replacing a mutated gene that causes disease with a healthy copy of the gene.

Inactivating, or “knocking out,” a mutated gene that is functioning improperly.

** Introducing a new gene into the body to help fight a disease. **

This mis-nomered 'vaccine' is a mRNA load that is injected into your body and is carried and introduced into your cells where your ribosomes start using that foreign RNA to synthesize foreign proteins inside your body to 'fight disease'

And I agree..you should stop your misinformation about this so called 'vaccine' because ** IT IS IN FACT GENE THERAPY **.

3
randomusers239874 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, it's not, and you clearly have never studied biology.

A GENE is a piece of DNA that is persistent throughout a cell's life cycle because it exists/has been inserted into your chromosomes. Gene therapy changes the actual genes in your chromosomes by those mechanisms you listed. All viruses inject either DNA or mRNA fragments into your cells when you're infected, in order to reproduce. They do not get injected into your chromosomes though; they just use the cell's existing machinery to produce proteins. That is exactly what the vaccine does. It uses the same exact mechanism as cold viruses to create a viral protein, but not a whole virus, which allows your body to detect the protein, and create an anti-body against it.

It is, by no definition, gene therapy. Words have meaning, and you don't get to just change them because you don't understand basic cellular biology.

-2
romanhelmet -2 points ago +1 / -3

LMAO...

I can change the definition to be anything I want. That's how the game is played.

Show me the rules and I will kick your ass.

Edit: Since you are a newbie, may I suggest that a full understanding of the rules is paramount before entering the arena.

3
randomusers239874 3 points ago +3 / -0

This literally might be the gayest comment I've ever seen on this site. I can only presume you're deflecting because you realize that you don't know shit about biology, and don't know how to respond? I bet you didn't know that viruses literally inject DNA and mRNA into your cells to replicate, and now you don't know how to support your point, right? And to anyone reading, don't worry, the DNA and mRNA from viruses doesn't stick around in your genome, except in specific cases (i.e. herpes). You know, liberals are retarded because they believe everything they hear, and people like your are the same kind of retarded, except you don't believe anything you hear.

0
romanhelmet 0 points ago +1 / -1

ROFLMAO...

It appears that newbie randomusers239874 is a true Fauci wanna be and I've triggered he/him/she/her/it (or whatever your pronouns are) into a fit of spitting rage.

And to be clear...The mRNA is an RNA version of a DNA gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made.

So mRNA is a gene and I wholeheartedly disagree with your assessment.

And if the only retort you have is to turn to personal attacks like an infant lefty liberal who is incapable of having an adult conversation, it makes no sense to respond any further as I have already won the argument when I successfully triggered you.

Edit: Yep...Gene Therapy...

The Pfizer / BioNTech jab is not a vaccine, it is an experimental gene therapy. It uses mRNA technology to instruct cells to create a specific spike protein that is allegedly part of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus. mRNA technology has never before been authorised for use in human beings – with good reason…

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/04/10/health-regulators-finally-admit-their-vaccines-kill-people-letter-from-great-britain-04-10-21/

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, whatever you say fag. I even said there are plenty of reasons to not take it that weren't retarded. mRNA is not a "version of a gene". It's a templated copy of the gene. In gene therapy, your actual chromosomes are changed, either by injecting a DNA sequence, or eliminating one. It takes specialized enzymes to accomplish such a feat (i.e. CRISPR). mRNA is not capable of being reverse transcribed, nor inserted into your chromosomes, and is quickly degraded inside the cell by RNase after producing proteins. You could take the cells that are transfected and do a DNA sequence, and you wouldn't be able to tell you got the vaccine. It is not gene therapy, no matter what retarded sources you want to cite.

-2
romanhelmet -2 points ago +1 / -3

**Gene Therapy Definition from NIH: **

Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease. In the future, this technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patient’s cells instead of using drugs or surgery. Researchers are testing several approaches to gene therapy, including:

  • Replacing a mutated gene that causes disease with a healthy copy of the gene.

  • Inactivating, or “knocking out,” a mutated gene that is functioning improperly.

  • ** Introducing a new gene into the body to help fight a disease. **

This mis-nomered 'vaccine' is a mRNA load that is injected into your body and is carried and introduced into your cells where your ribosomes start using that foreign RNA to synthesize foreign proteins inside your body to 'fight disease'

And I agree..you should stop your misinformation about the this called 'vaccine' because ** IT IS IN FACT GENE THERAPY **.

5
Ex-libtard 5 points ago +6 / -1

Coronavirus is the common code. Well 1/2 the other being rhinovirus.

3
Gnometard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, it's just a bad cold. We get them from time to time. Many people call it the flu when they get it because nobody really gets tested for influenza. I had flu in January, demanded a test just to be a dick about it.

Had symptoms, sent from work to get tested. Told the doctor it was the flu. They didn't believe me and did the test.

Test came back negative and she said "since it's not covid it must be the flu"

"Shouldn't you test to be sure?"

And she looked at me like I'm retarded for asking for a test, because up until the MSM paranoia you didn't need a test for something if they didn't need a diagnosis for treatment

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, its what I find the most annoying. People act like not wearing 5 masks, a buttplug, full body sanatizing every thirty seconds, injecting anything the Falcify says to inject is crazy.

But at the same time, they didn't give shit about any flu before hand, and they think that the goverment will finally say "its over" and they won't have do anything for the flu after.

1
Scottish_Patriot [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

If you say so, I’ll add it to the list of unverified possibilities:)

4
Mamapedia 4 points ago +5 / -1

Seems like you triggered a bunch of Karens. Go figure.

6
Scottish_Patriot [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Haha. Completely, I had to check where I was for a second, thought I was on Twitter by mistake:). :)

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a bad cold. That's all it is. That's why it's only killing the elderly who are nearing death.

People get bad colds all the time, they just say "flu" as a colloquial term for "sick"

-2
DrCowboyPresident -2 points ago +2 / -4

Lions are just a cat therefore they are not dangerous.

1
Ex-libtard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cats are lions so they are dangerous?

You havent said anything.

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lions are only deadly if you're in their territory and unprotected.

Covid is only deadly if you're old and very sick, and your governor allows it into your long term care facility.

You're right, it's comparable to lions... only deadly in very specific settings

1
DrCowboyPresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't personally know anybody, I see.

3
MAGAconvert 3 points ago +4 / -1

They have vaccines for the common cold every year, well except this past year for some reason.

3
rentfREEEE_since2016 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not a new virus. And also the sars-cov-2 vaccine is a repurposed sars-cov-1 vaccine. They had the platform canned for almost 8 years. Big medicine really wanted an excuse to sell this.

Also, makes it even more nefarious that they didn’t tell the public this outright and held back the vaccine until after the election so trump wouldn’t get credit. They knew exactly what the timeline was. They manipulated it for political purposes.

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's just a bad cold.

They knew people are under media control, so they hyped it.

They knew people were unaware that hospitals get busy every cold and flu season, so they used that to scare em.

They knew the regular progression of cold and flu season would have deaths too far spread out to scare people, so they put the sick in nursing homes to kill the season's would be victims in a short period of time to be able to push fear.

2
rentfREEEE_since2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t disagree with you on any of this but it’s a fact that the vaccine platform was specifically developed for SARS-cov-1 (aka swine flu) and repurposed for the current PLANDEMIC.

3
AnointedVisions 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well it's the flu, so...

3
UrTVisLying2U 3 points ago +3 / -0

This meme was probably made before the announcement last week that they, gates foundation, have created a HIV vaccine modeled on the moderna mRNA shot. It's one of the greatest hoaxes ever pulled.

4
TPMJB 4 points ago +4 / -0

HIV vaccines are produced almost every year and fail in clinical trials since they're never effective.

3
Annpi 3 points ago +3 / -0

So either there is (1) cures for hiv, cold, cancer but it's hush hush or (2) there's more than likely not a cure for any of those plus more

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

There kind of is

Don't be fat

Get exercise

Don't be fat

Get sunlight

Don't be fat

Eat nutritious foods, not boxed cancer

Don't be fat.

Follow the above and you'll significantly reduce your risk of ALL CAUSES of death.

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

Due to the way those things mutate, there is very little chance there will ever be a cure for them. With that said, the most effective way to fight them is your own immune system, and there has been a lot of research in that area in the last few years. For example, there are some trials going on where they extract your immune cells, teach them to fight the specific kind of cancer you have in a lab, then reinject them into you to fight off the cancer. It actually shows a lot of promise.

3
REDMARAUDER 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be fair HIV is a retrovirus. It mutates in impossibly few interactions

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also HIV attacks the very thing that your body needs to defeat viruses. Unless we have a nanobot vaccine, it's not happenin'.

3
WeaponizedSmirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder how you reconcile Trump being the one to have the vaccine developed and rushed to the public, him telling everyone to take it but also thinking it's something made a cabal of vampires that want to take over the world?

2
animehenat 2 points ago +2 / -0

the only reason there is a vaccine for covid in a year is bc donald trump gets things done ahead of schedule, and he told us to get our shots bc they're safe. Why? bc vaccines are just dead versions of viruses that our bodies can fight off, so we are immune. I've been a part of TD since 2017, but the only thing I've never cared for is this antivax conspiracy BS that's been taking over TD since we left reddit. The vaccine was OUR accomplishment, bc there's no reason it should take years to be finished, but getting something like covid is not really comparable to something like aids or cancer, so what the hell is all this BS.

2
Burninator 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a vaccine (gene therapy) for HIV. It actually works but was never approved because of the bad side effects.

2
NutterButter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a fact. There is now a vaccine for HIV, derived from the Moderna covid vaccine, I believe.

Still though, that was a mighty fast vaccine developed for covid.

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

This virus is the common cold.

2
HoneyBadger32 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never.

2
itsdangerous 2 points ago +2 / -0

cancer is not a virus. I believe these meme are glowing memes hoping people repost them and look dumb.

2
Ch3f4554551n 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Coronavirus" = common cold. AMA.

2
remember1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not one year. Eight fucking months. Thats less than a human baby. Within eight they went to internal trials then soon after that mass production.

Mind blowing how these sheep inject an unknown substance into their bodies without question, without raising a single question or concern

2
RED_WAVE 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just tell people that I'm the control group.

Let them be the guinea pigs. They usually leave me alone after that.

1
LiberalTearFiend 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is particualry troublesome is that those decades of research resulted in the being very good at targeting glycoprotein 41 and GP 120 which basely is a way they tried to target HIV on its glycan shield which is part of the envelope of the cell because RNA viruses are near impossible to vaccinate for. Big coincidence that this Novel corona virus (bats lol) has those exact same glycoproteins on them. Coincidence? No they created a virus to be perfect for their technology. FUCKERS.

1
50_stars_for_freedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can’t vaccinate against cancer

1
stagolee 1 point ago +2 / -1

I get the point, but Cancer isn't a virus and will never be cured with a vaccine...Although there is an HPV vaccine, which is a virus that can lead to cancer...The cancer mention is dumb.

1
Scottish_Patriot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have I touched a nerve or sumin !?

Chill Dude !

1
MrJugsMcBulge 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can’t have a vaccine for “cancer” because “cancer” isn’t one disease with a single cause. The genetic causes of prostate cancer are different than breast cancer are different than melanoma are different than leukemia, etc. You’d need separate vaccines for each of them. And we actually DO have vaccines for some of the cancers caused by HPV.

There’s not a vaccine for the common cold because there isn’t only one virus that causes the common cold. Cold symptoms are a result of how the immune system responds to any of a number of different rhinoviruses, coronaviruses, etc.

There’s not a vaccine for HIV because it mutates too fast.

2
ThrushLimbald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like how a "Coronavirus" is a classification/broad type too?

2
Gnometard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, RNA is very unstable and mutates easily so those viruses can't be killed off

1
HunterG22 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vaccines are really effective at things with a single strain or single problem. COVID 19 is a single strain. But will likely be ineffective next year due to mutations.

HIV is hard to cure because it's a bit like a soviet spy. Sure your having a war on the front line but the spy is in your troops as one of your troops and creating fella of soviets what's there.

Science hasn't figured out how to tell your normal healthy cells. And the cells with sleeper HIV in it.

Influenza mutates when you look at it. To the point that the flu vaccine actually is for dozens of common strains. Not one.

Cancer... cancer... the millions of types with the problem of its a healthy cell acting in unhealthy ways. We're getting there on that. Several promising experiments. But we got a long way to go.

1
Neonlightdistrict 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plant.

Anything vaccine related is bullshit.

Someone probably posted this to make fun of us.

Don't believe me? Read the spars document!

1
slowmotrin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The interesting part is that the Corona virus is a type of common cold, So I wonder if this vaccine would do anything for the regular cold itself.

1
ARfreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no cancer virus...