I saw CNN at a hotel the other day. They were harping about how the vaccine may help people with long term symptoms from getting the disease before, it might not, it maybe might.
Apparently that was a coordinated effort because a state official this week was talking about “covid long haul”, people who were hospitalized and have side effects long after. The symptoms are your tired, and have cognitive issues. Duh, they’re old, fat and have diabetes and heart issues. Supposedly the miracle cure vaccines, and I’ll quote her “ show promising anecdotal treatment” ofsaid issues. She giddily reiterated that theres not much data but that they are very hopeful.
Does anyone know the long term effects? Are there studies done on what happens when people catch covid after vaccinated (ADE)? Why did they skip the animal trials? What is effect on fertility? And considering how hell bent they were to distribute this to every single person on earth, even squashing drugs that would have prevented “EUA”, do you trust them? The shots are currently in stage 3, which means, yes they are still testing it on people (or else they would just be FDA approved). They don’t have answers to a lot of questions.
Those are all reasonable questions, especially concerns about long term effects which would not be known by definition without a long time to assess it. It was a risk/reward that the FDA felt was worth it, so they granted EUA off the of the study results. These were not small scale studies, and it assessed severity of illness among many demographics. They also assessed different vaccine concentrations and weighed the immune response vs the side effects and went for the middle of the 3 doses. The studies did not test it on pregnant people to my knowledge.
If you dig through my post history, you will find plenty of criticism for the vaccine where I feel it is deserved, but it does bug me when people plainly state that studies weren't done. They absolutely did them.
The one I hear all the time is “if it wasn’t safe, it wouldn’t be approved by the FDA.” When I point out that it infact isn’t approved, I get called a conspiracy theorist.
It becomes a semantic debate about "authorized" vs "approved". In order to get EUA approval, they had to do a large randomized control trial. That is usually what people are referring to by "doing the research". Have you read them?
literally just had this argument. they were like "it's approved on the FDA site". when i pointed out that it was approved for emergency use and therefore not actually approved, it's like their brain shut down
Yea I was at a local street fair in California last night since they let it reopen. (It's outdoors btw) every moron was wearing a mask. I think the security was making people. I saw two black kids like 13 and 10. They were skateboarding and not wearing any masks. I gave them a thumbs up and the younger one did a few kick flips before finally landing one. It was cool to see. I always get really excited when I see others not in masks. I feel like they are some sort of old friend!
I treat people in masks like they're NPCs. Not because I want to. But I just don't see them as actual people anymore. I felt the same way about women in full burkas. At this point I'd happily trade Hijabs for masks. Not that I want those either just would prefer.
Google-ing "Covid-19 Vaccine" isn't research. Reading research papers in notable Medicine Scientific Journals/Magazines is doing research. A published research paper in a notable scientific platform isn't a Sunday afternoon light reading time for the "Google Researcher".
Google, give me a socially acceptable opinion, and tell me what to say in it's defence.
Sad thing is, all the rule changes and moving goalposts are intentional. When you can't figure out what the rules are you have little choice but to obey and let someone else interpret reality for you... At least that's the dilemma as they want you to see it.
Google, give me a socially acceptable opinion, and tell me what to say in it's defence.
Sad thing is, all the rule changes and moving goalposts are intentional. When you can't figure out what the rules are you have little choice but to obey and let someone else interpret reality for you... At least that's the dilemma as they want you to see it.
I hear it all the time. If the manufacturer has no clue, neither do you. They didn’t test it, they’re testing it on you.
I saw CNN at a hotel the other day. They were harping about how the vaccine may help people with long term symptoms from getting the disease before, it might not, it maybe might.
This is all a total joke
Apparently that was a coordinated effort because a state official this week was talking about “covid long haul”, people who were hospitalized and have side effects long after. The symptoms are your tired, and have cognitive issues. Duh, they’re old, fat and have diabetes and heart issues. Supposedly the miracle cure vaccines, and I’ll quote her “ show promising anecdotal treatment” ofsaid issues. She giddily reiterated that theres not much data but that they are very hopeful.
Muh sciences!
They did test it. That's how they got EUA. The study results are publicly available.
Does anyone know the long term effects? Are there studies done on what happens when people catch covid after vaccinated (ADE)? Why did they skip the animal trials? What is effect on fertility? And considering how hell bent they were to distribute this to every single person on earth, even squashing drugs that would have prevented “EUA”, do you trust them? The shots are currently in stage 3, which means, yes they are still testing it on people (or else they would just be FDA approved). They don’t have answers to a lot of questions.
Those are all reasonable questions, especially concerns about long term effects which would not be known by definition without a long time to assess it. It was a risk/reward that the FDA felt was worth it, so they granted EUA off the of the study results. These were not small scale studies, and it assessed severity of illness among many demographics. They also assessed different vaccine concentrations and weighed the immune response vs the side effects and went for the middle of the 3 doses. The studies did not test it on pregnant people to my knowledge.
If you dig through my post history, you will find plenty of criticism for the vaccine where I feel it is deserved, but it does bug me when people plainly state that studies weren't done. They absolutely did them.
The one I hear all the time is “if it wasn’t safe, it wouldn’t be approved by the FDA.” When I point out that it infact isn’t approved, I get called a conspiracy theorist.
It was approved for experimental use dummy!
Authorized vs approved
Fen-phen, Thalidomide, Tunguskee, Vioxx, etc. etc...
"Big pharma is evil!" Turned into "BIG PHARMA CAN DO NO WRONG!" really fucking quick.
It becomes a semantic debate about "authorized" vs "approved". In order to get EUA approval, they had to do a large randomized control trial. That is usually what people are referring to by "doing the research". Have you read them?
literally just had this argument. they were like "it's approved on the FDA site". when i pointed out that it was approved for emergency use and therefore not actually approved, it's like their brain shut down
Meanwhile trans people are like "I'm getting the vaccine, as with the current economy ropes and sharp objects are too expensive for my tastes".
Theres always a bright side!
Dudes like this give me hope for the blacks
There are way more based blacks than the media would have you believe. The guys probably ben censored for promoting white rhetoric.
Yea I was at a local street fair in California last night since they let it reopen. (It's outdoors btw) every moron was wearing a mask. I think the security was making people. I saw two black kids like 13 and 10. They were skateboarding and not wearing any masks. I gave them a thumbs up and the younger one did a few kick flips before finally landing one. It was cool to see. I always get really excited when I see others not in masks. I feel like they are some sort of old friend!
I always thank people in stores for not wearing them. I usually follow up with "we need to end this, it never will until we do."
I treat people in masks like they're NPCs. Not because I want to. But I just don't see them as actual people anymore. I felt the same way about women in full burkas. At this point I'd happily trade Hijabs for masks. Not that I want those either just would prefer.
A majority voted for Trump.
They skewed the numbers with the fraud.
Google-ing "Covid-19 Vaccine" isn't research. Reading research papers in notable Medicine Scientific Journals/Magazines is doing research. A published research paper in a notable scientific platform isn't a Sunday afternoon light reading time for the "Google Researcher".
This is funny because Google is the only search engine that will hide any result that oppose to official narrative.
Google, give me a socially acceptable opinion, and tell me what to say in it's defence.
Sad thing is, all the rule changes and moving goalposts are intentional. When you can't figure out what the rules are you have little choice but to obey and let someone else interpret reality for you... At least that's the dilemma as they want you to see it.
Google, give me a socially acceptable opinion, and tell me what to say in it's defence.
Sad thing is, all the rule changes and moving goalposts are intentional. When you can't figure out what the rules are you have little choice but to obey and let someone else interpret reality for you... At least that's the dilemma as they want you to see it.
Haha