Except every medical expert to testify so far rules that out, explained why, and cross examination couldn't get them to say anything to even call this into question.
Maybe if you knew the first thing about how people die from fentanyl OD?
No question he was high af. No question every sign of fatal fentanyl OD was absent. This was probed in excruciating detail.
If it were there wouldn't be a trial.
Both sides think it's an open and shut case; the peanut gallery that is.
You can watch the body camera footage, and look at the toxicology report and safety draw the conclusion that Floyd died of a drug overdose.
Except every medical expert to testify so far rules that out, explained why, and cross examination couldn't get them to say anything to even call this into question.
Maybe if you knew the first thing about how people die from fentanyl OD?
No question he was high af. No question every sign of fatal fentanyl OD was absent. This was probed in excruciating detail.
"Medical experts" who didn't actually examine the body. He ODd.
You're the sort of person who thinks trannies are actually woman and children should be on hormone blockers
Actually I'm not.
Resorting to ad hom means you're frustrated that you have no reason for your position.
Try reality instead
Defense still gets their turn to call witnesses, after prosecution is done