Except every medical expert to testify so far rules that out, explained why, and cross examination couldn't get them to say anything to even call this into question.
Maybe if you knew the first thing about how people die from fentanyl OD?
No question he was high af. No question every sign of fatal fentanyl OD was absent. This was probed in excruciating detail.
Except every medical expert to testify so far rules that out, explained why, and cross examination couldn't get them to say anything to even call this into question.
Maybe if you knew the first thing about how people die from fentanyl OD?
No question he was high af. No question every sign of fatal fentanyl OD was absent. This was probed in excruciating detail.
"Medical experts" who didn't actually examine the body. He ODd.
You're the sort of person who thinks trannies are actually woman and children should be on hormone blockers
Actually I'm not.
Resorting to ad hom means you're frustrated that you have no reason for your position.
Try reality instead
Defense still gets their turn to call witnesses, after prosecution is done
Nah I mainly use ad hom when someone is being awful, and dishonest . Like you
You can't even comprehend what's been said, much less evaluate it