407
Comments (105)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
Kaarous 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doesn’t happen on a systemic level

This is the part where I don't care anymore then, because you know what does happen on a systemic level? Crime.

Making so called police brutality a priority at all detracts from real problems that could be solved if we stopped being scoped in on red herrings for once.

4
Groundpounder 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m all about law and order myself. And if you’re also about keeping government in check, you can’t give the executive branch a blank check to kick down your door and start issuing orders and/or beating you to death. Remember: many based officers have retired when they learned the Soros-funded DAs wouldn’t prosecute leftist criminals. They’ve been replaced with cops who won’t hesitate to confiscate your guns or arrest you for a meme you posted. Be careful what you wish for.

1
Kaarous 1 point ago +2 / -1

you can’t give the executive branch a blank check to kick down your door and start issuing orders and/or beating you to death.

And there's a vast, vast gulf between persecuting local cops when a crackhead overdoses in their presence, and creating a door kicking police state.

I quite simply don't care if criminals die at the hands of the police. If anything I'd like to see it happen more frequently. The only problem here is that we allow leftists into positions of authority, so that they pervert legitimate authority to serve Marxism.

But that is not a problem with the paradigm of policing in and of itself.

3
Groundpounder 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a criminal isn’t resisting arrest or physically threatening an officer of the law, why would it be fine for a cop to kill them? That’s a police state, when the cops become the judge, jury, and executioner. Last I checked it’s not what the founding fathers had in mind for our criminal justice system.