I had thought about it a lot and decided that it was probably worth the risk, based on conversations with medical researchers who really understand how it works.
Then yesterday we had a workplace webinar where the president said that all staff are required to get the vaccine. Someone said how can you possibly require a vaccine that isn't even approved, but is only under emergency use authorization. The general counsel piped up and said that we think we are within our legal rights to require you to get it.
Someone else pointed out that in order to get this experimental vaccine we have to sign away our liability rights, so if the vaccine injures or kills us we have no recourse. And so isn't the company then liable for forcing you to take that risk? The webinar went silent for about 40 seconds and then the general counsel said that she would "circle back" on that question. So now they are worried...
Going to wait this one out for a bit.
My reasoning for not taking it is that I’m waiting for more safety tests (plus I’ll let the millions of other guinea pigs test it for me lol), and the whole fact that the government is making them immune to liability. I’d be alright with the latter if the safety tests were stringent and long but the vaccines haven’t even been tested for a year yet.
No matter how safe something is, remember that Dems/communists stole the election and want you dead. They can add something special for majority Republican zones.