Jeff Epstein helped Robert’s adopt two Welsh children through Brazil, circumventing US law. Roberts flew 24 times to Epstein Island. What else did he do there?
Roberts has a very peculiar sense of morality. A lot of his unpopular decisions or votes can be explained by his odd prioritization with how history will view his court. There are several excellent papers that analyze this and they ring true to me.
I have no idea if he is compromised or not, but his ability to render objective decisions is certainly up for question.
You wouldnt if you knew, and saw what the officers found and vomited after viewing. These are seasoned law enforcement officers. So you think you want to see but you have no idea the depth of this depravity.
JoBama undoubtedly want a different chief Justice since they're getting everything else on their wishlist, why not.
Throw the useful idiot to the wolves and make some crackpot Chief Justice so forced gender reassignment making everyone hermaphrodites can be decided as 100% constitutional.
I believe at the time they weren't allowing anybody except citizens to adopt kids from there. He went around the rules pretty much. An open secret at this point. Fuck him he's ruining the country
John Roberts may not be as bad of a person as we all assume he is. He was pretty reasonable and sane up until the point he went full libtard and upheld Obamacare. No one suddenly goes full libtard unless they are forced to.Obama and his thugs must’ve been made an offer he couldn’t refuse. Probably had very serious credible threats made against him and his family.I’m sure this goes way beyond simple blackmail and bribes.
there might be a john of god connection to at least one or both of his kids. if this is the reason he has serious legal issues that could put him in jail for years if it came out. this would explain why he went liberated.
As a woman myself, I would modify the original statement to the vast majority of women can't lead. Maggie Thatchers are one in a billion. I've never been so disgruntled with my own sex as I have been this past year, every single hiveminded idiot who's given me shit for not wearing a mask is another woman.
More like people that don't pay a net positive amount of taxes. The property thing is an anachronism; no one had "jobs" back in the day except vagrants and slaves. If you owned land, that meant you were getting taxed on the output of it. That's not really relevant nowadays since you don't need land to produce things, so it's better to go back to the original reason, rather than the implementation. No taxation without representation should imply no representation without taxation.
As was the right to vote to non-property owners and people who don't pay taxes. That was our real downfall that leads straight to socialism and the welfare state. Which of course is unsustainable and will cause a huge collapse of our civilization eventually.
Me too but I have had my confrontations with men too about the mask. I just hold up my hand like a stop sign and keep walking. Dont waste your time with them and words. Its not productive. They are oxygen deprived.
The male politicians in the House & Senate voted by a 2/3 majority to approve prohibition. And 3/4 of the state politicians (which were like 99% male) voted to approve it too. So when you talk about votes...those are votes, since we live in a republic, not a direct democracy. People don't vote for legislation, politicians do.
Besides, women didn't vote for prohibition supporting politicians at all fuckwit...prohibition was implemented by the 18th Amendment, which came BEFORE women were given the right to vote with the 19th Amendment.
18 comes before 19. Women got the right to vote after prohibition was implemented.
The west is riding on the accomplishments of its forefathers... the time is quickly coming where the residual momentum ends and it all comes crashing down. The west is a joke for throwing this all away. Import 3rd world garbage, and your society quickly becomes 3rd world garbage.
oh fuck off stormfag. if only white women voted trump would still win in a landslide with 327 EVs. yet you cucks don't realize that mass illegal immigration is the problem, not women or jews.
There's been so many over the years. The Coultergiest made a list once of all the Republican SCOTUS picks that went left after being confirmed. In recent times I would rank Souter ahead of ACB and Sandra Day O'Connor wasn't great either. Souter went full on communist and was even to the left of the evil personified Gingrich. Very few Republican picks stay conservative. Alito, Scalia and the incomparable Thomas are exceptions.
The kids were the clue. I have nothing against the kids, it's the mom that can't keep her hands off kids from some other country as though there were no needy kids here.
Exactly, it's what literally every federal agency under this tyrant does. Federal government and most state governments are no longer legitimate and hold no moral authority after what we've seen over the past few years
Thank you. They only hold authority if people let them. Try walking into a church house full of people and try pushing them around. Good luck. There was just a video circulating of some health inspectors trying to get into a bar/restaurant...they were chased out simply by people chanting "get out". We can get far more convincing with actions way louder/stronger than chanting (if you catch my drift). Their time is over once we all realize we are in control!
They aren't retarded, they are fighting the good fight. You need standing to challenge a law, so if they never asked for permission and got denied - they wouldn't have been able to have this law struck down.
They are Patriots and we should all hope to be more like them.
Someone had to be really annoying their neighbors for this to have become an issue. More like someone running a church in a single-family home with too many cars and such. That's just being a bad neighbor and has nothing to do with the bible.
Screw that. If they shut down my church, I sure as hell am having as many people at my place to worship as I can manage. They will not trample on my liberties!
There's always the chance for a neighbor whose counting the number of people entering your house for a gathering. But that should be very rare. It seems more likely that there was something else annoying the neighbor who reported a Bible study group.
You obviously have not had to deal with bad neighbors. You are either too young or too privileged and live in a special neighborhood with lots of HOA rules to prevent annoying neighbors.
Exactly. Fucking Republicans.
Ask permission to observe the vote count while holding a court order granting your access, and then take no for an answer.
The title of this post may be a little misleading.
While yes, Roberts is a sack of shit and voted like the leftist he is to uphold California's in-home Bible study ban, overall enough Justices voted to rule that California's in-home Bible study ban is unconstitutional.
They've sided on all religious cases so far this year. The one over religious speech at universities was YUGE. I don't see California winning without a packed court.
I agree with you, but these aren’t “wins”. We already had the right for religious assembly, like we had a right to bear arms not to be infringed, and every ruling upholding the status quo is just a push.
All of them are wins. This one being a push doesn't mean doom is ahead when cases this year have proven otherwise. You are in the right direction of viewing the constitution but fail to apply the great system we have which the left wants to destroy. This case made it to the top court after dealing with the 9th circuit. It is working exactly as it should. Take a look at cases during the Spanish Flu. Especially on Religious Freedoms. You will change your mind.
John Roberts didn’t “join the court’s liberal wing in dissenting” this time, he’s part of the court’s liberal wing ALL the time. We should be surprised if he EVER agrees with Thomas or Alito at this point.
LOL. How would anyone even know? I keep hearing loud music, large gatherings and the sounds of people have a good time together. In SoCal. They could just as easily be doing a bible study group, and it would make a lot less noise.
What I have learned since this CV-19 Plan-demic is that we dont have a United States of America. We have 50 separate fiefdoms rulled by maniac governors who apparently dont give the slightest consideration to our constitution or their constituents. We have been labeled non-essential. To whom exactly? Them? Before that we were deplorables. To who exactly? Them? We learned in democrat metro areas like Seattle, peaceful protests meant murder and rape, and it was OK.They called it "the summer of love". In fact, the immediate need was to defund the nasty police. We also learned that Antifa is a myth.
Nope, the myth is there is no United States of America, if there ever was one. It certainly is no more.
The authority of the states has always been an important issue. The Civil War was not about slavery, it was about the federal government wanting more control, which it got, but now we are seeing a trend going back to state authority.
I thought America was founded on religious freedom? They are telling us what we can do in our own homes now? Makes sense. I know they are blocking up restaurants and not allowing the owners to go into their own property they are paying for. This is all in the name of saving humanity from a virus that has many vaccine options and drug options and prophylactics. Oh yea it also has a 95% survival rate. But its"new" people don't know a lot about it...... by new I mean a year and half old
What I don't get. If they think it fails the freedom of religion because they applied the same restrictions to secular, how the hell do they get past freedom of assembly?
That's some crafty headline skills OP. At first I thought it was a loss especially with the limited context. Seems Trumps SCOTUS picks pulled through for us. This is great news.
Here is another article of the win that doesn't require paid subscription.
And how is limiting secular gatherings to three people not an infringement on the right to peacefully assemble? What the flying fuck is this clown world. I think we’re well beyond clown world, and have been for over a year
Its worse than just Roberts. This group of asshats in black robes just enumerated the grounds that California could flagrantly prohibit your first amendment rights that shall not be prohibited. Provided they treat others similarly, you can be banned from bible study at someone's house.
How the fuck do you get 14th amendment equal protection/disparate treatment arguments on a first amendment issue case??
This is a won the battle lose the war scenario here. Fuck all of these fools.
“Government regulations are not neutral and generally applicable” and should be scrutinized “whenever they treat any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise,” the opinion read.
California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise, permitting hair salons, retail stores, personal care services, movie theaters, private suites at sporting events and concerts, and indoor restaurants … .”
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett wrote in the majority that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had repeatedly ignored instructions from the Supreme Court.
“This is the fifth time the court has summarily rejected the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of California’s Covid restrictions on religious exercise,” the opinion said.
Justices Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor argued that California had complied with the First Amendment by treating religious gatherings like every other gathering.
Yes, both sides in this 5-4 decision are dimwits. The difference between the 2 sides is that the majority felt that treating the secular activities with less restrictions was grounds to invalidate the restriction on at home worship. By this logic, if there was no disparate treatment, the restrictions could stand. The minority felt that the government complied.
How about both sides are retarded and you simply cannot prohibit someone from the free exercise of religion in their own homes. We don’t need to invent fake extreme examples of religions that nobody has practiced or does not/will not practice. This is a basic religious right that has existed since founding and prior, and an activity which has gone on since founding and prior. Fuck SCOTUS for inventing ways to take away our rights.
Yay! Rejoice that this law was struck down! But wait till those fags comply with the scotus logic and now get the blessing.
This is the 4th case in California that SCOTUS has ruled in favor of religious freedoms. They also sided with religious speech at colleges. They've sided on all religious freedoms cases so far (since ACB). I don't know why people are upset. We've all known Robert's to be a joke of a RINO Justice planted by Democrats/RINOs. Had Trump not selected these justices we would be screwed. This is a win.
its winning the battle not the war. Read the logic. SCOTUS majority opinion enumerates the standard to prohibit your free exercise of religion that shall not be prohibited. How you can call that a win is beyond me. Just because this particular restriction was invalidated does not mean this was good logic. Now, they have the template for how an absolute right isn't absolute anymore.
And then think about how they are using a 14th amendment equal protection/disparate treatment argument to invalidate what is a first amendment issue. That is bullshit.
You don't have to win the battles to defeat your enemy. That's how Washington beat the British.
The Justices addressed the case as it was presented. You are ignoring the previous religious freedom cases they have sided with this year. They've sided for religious freedoms. It's a win.
I've watched all of the cases. They all outlay criteria by which government can infringe upon your rights based on a hoax emergency declaration. Which, in case you didn't realize, there is no emergency suspension of rights in the constitution except for habeas corpus, and that must be expressly suspended. Instead of saying "Hey, you can't just throw away the constitution just because of some 'emergency' arbitrarily declared indefinitely!" They say "Well, if you treat x differently than y, you can't do that. If you treat x and y the same, then you may infringe upon their rights to your heart's content."
I don't know where you come from, but where I come from, that's called bullshit. And faulty logic. And the erosion of freedom. That is not a win. That is laying the ground work for a massive ass jam down the pike. So what if the current standard is tossed? What are you gonna say when the commies come back with a restriction that passes the standard articulated here? Are you gonna celebrate because they stuck with "stare decisis" and claim this is all legit?
You know them by what they do. The state has no business meddling in religion by restricting it. California is no better than China in suppressing religion, to suit the desires of the Satanists.
Rush tried to warn us about Roberts way back during the ObamaCare case. He was right. Roberts has always sided with these demonic fucks on the big cases. Of course we know why, he was pals with Epstein.
He's compromised. Judge Pedo is a sloppy vagina.
I wonder just how bad the blackmail is.
I say WE FIND THE BLACKMAIL MATERIAL AND EXPOSE HIM FIRST. Get him out of our hair
Jeff Epstein helped Robert’s adopt two Welsh children through Brazil, circumventing US law. Roberts flew 24 times to Epstein Island. What else did he do there?
Probably some child murder-fucking, adrenochrome chugging, and Molach ritual dancing.
Roberts has a very peculiar sense of morality. A lot of his unpopular decisions or votes can be explained by his odd prioritization with how history will view his court. There are several excellent papers that analyze this and they ring true to me.
I have no idea if he is compromised or not, but his ability to render objective decisions is certainly up for question.
Sauce on those papers pls.
Just in case 'good' people may escape pain in the afterlife, Roberts (and all judges) make sure these people cop some hurt here...first.
The State is not satisfied leaving the revenge up to 'Heaven'. Imo that's a good idea.
Copious amounts of dick sucking.
you dont want to know believe me.
Actually, I do.
You wouldnt if you knew, and saw what the officers found and vomited after viewing. These are seasoned law enforcement officers. So you think you want to see but you have no idea the depth of this depravity.
I'll be fine. I've heard the stories, and I've seen similar. It needs to be made public. The truth must be allowd out.
Screw that sensitivity. Evil is able to hide because it's too evil to be seen? Let it out and let justice settle the matter.
Is this 100% confirmed?
There could be a lot of people with that name.
I went to college with one.
I’d be afraid of who they’d put on. Stacy Abrams or something
0bama...
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Jeebus. Don't even go there.
It could be coming.
JoBama undoubtedly want a different chief Justice since they're getting everything else on their wishlist, why not.
Throw the useful idiot to the wolves and make some crackpot Chief Justice so forced gender reassignment making everyone hermaphrodites can be decided as 100% constitutional.
There's the picture of him hanging out with Clinton & Epstein in the tropics...been posted here before.
He adopted two irish kids through brazil long ago.
I've not seen a good explanation for why he wouldn't use normal adoption channels. I assume it has something to do with pedo stuff?
I read on old T_D that his kids are from Ireland. There's supposely a law where you can't adopt directly from the country [Ireland].
I believe he bascially "Evergreen" his adopted children here.
Bascially a grey market adoption if you want to call it that.
I believe at the time they weren't allowing anybody except citizens to adopt kids from there. He went around the rules pretty much. An open secret at this point. Fuck him he's ruining the country
Maybe he's just an evil piece of shit
W Bush pick. Fuck the Bush family in their cunts. They have damaged this country far more than the Clintons
Eh? Bush picked Alito and HW picked Clarence Thomas. Those have been solid.
John Roberts may not be as bad of a person as we all assume he is. He was pretty reasonable and sane up until the point he went full libtard and upheld Obamacare. No one suddenly goes full libtard unless they are forced to.Obama and his thugs must’ve been made an offer he couldn’t refuse. Probably had very serious credible threats made against him and his family.I’m sure this goes way beyond simple blackmail and bribes.
I stopped reading after -
“John Roberts may not be as bad of a person as we all assume he is.”
So did I and then I down voted.
Then come out and say it. Live free or die trying. Tired of all the pussies.
Delusional
there might be a john of god connection to at least one or both of his kids. if this is the reason he has serious legal issues that could put him in jail for years if it came out. this would explain why he went liberated.
This guy is the 2nd biggest disappointment in the history of SCOTUS behind ACB.
Should not, at least.
Nah, fuck off. I see you all the time on here posting this anti-woman drivel. Would you rather have MTG/Lauren Boebert or Adam Kinzinger?
It's not man vs woman that's the problem - it's RINOs that lack a spine.
U/tantalum_tungsten is probably just pissed he can't get a wife or gf.
As a woman myself, I would modify the original statement to the vast majority of women can't lead. Maggie Thatchers are one in a billion. I've never been so disgruntled with my own sex as I have been this past year, every single hiveminded idiot who's given me shit for not wearing a mask is another woman.
Giving people without property to vote is a problem and teenagers
More like people that don't pay a net positive amount of taxes. The property thing is an anachronism; no one had "jobs" back in the day except vagrants and slaves. If you owned land, that meant you were getting taxed on the output of it. That's not really relevant nowadays since you don't need land to produce things, so it's better to go back to the original reason, rather than the implementation. No taxation without representation should imply no representation without taxation.
I will never not upvote this.
Female suffrage was the Western Civilization's original poison pill.
As was the right to vote to non-property owners and people who don't pay taxes. That was our real downfall that leads straight to socialism and the welfare state. Which of course is unsustainable and will cause a huge collapse of our civilization eventually.
It might up the value of marriage too.
Me too but I have had my confrontations with men too about the mask. I just hold up my hand like a stop sign and keep walking. Dont waste your time with them and words. Its not productive. They are oxygen deprived.
Are you my fiance or mom? They both feel the same way.
I guess it's a coincidence that prohibition and govt nannying went into overdrive right after the 19th
Prohibition was pushed by big business. Manufacturers were tired of workers going out and getting drunk at lunch and fucking things up.
Implemented by male politicians. There was only one female Senator and 3 female House members when prohibition went into effect.
But retards don't understand correlation vs. causation.
It's not sex, it's race that's causing shitty policies. Black people vote 90% Democrat.
If only white women voted Trump would still win in a landslide with 327 electoral votes.
https://kekpe.pe/i/6072186aaa3f0.jpg
Now that's Grade A goal post moving.
We are talking about who VOTES, genius.
The male politicians in the House & Senate voted by a 2/3 majority to approve prohibition. And 3/4 of the state politicians (which were like 99% male) voted to approve it too. So when you talk about votes...those are votes, since we live in a republic, not a direct democracy. People don't vote for legislation, politicians do.
Besides, women didn't vote for prohibition supporting politicians at all fuckwit...prohibition was implemented by the 18th Amendment, which came BEFORE women were given the right to vote with the 19th Amendment.
18 comes before 19. Women got the right to vote after prohibition was implemented.
Keep fighting the good fight.
The anti women / anti black shit around here is poison. They have to get the fuck out and go back.
You don’t seem to have a good grasp of the reality of statistical average behavioral patterns of demographics.
Inbreds that come here from stormfront and many came over when that shithole voat shut down.
The west is a joke? Compared to who? Best quality of life here.
Compared to who?
The west is riding on the accomplishments of its forefathers... the time is quickly coming where the residual momentum ends and it all comes crashing down. The west is a joke for throwing this all away. Import 3rd world garbage, and your society quickly becomes 3rd world garbage.
oh fuck off stormfag. if only white women voted trump would still win in a landslide with 327 EVs. yet you cucks don't realize that mass illegal immigration is the problem, not women or jews.
https://kekpe.pe/i/6072186aaa3f0.jpg
Not just illegals but the 1965 immigration law change which changed the makeup of America and who pushed that? Teddy Kennedy and some NY congressman
lol women didn't vote for the mass replacement. white women voted for trump 327-211
https://kekpe.pe/i/6072186aaa3f0.jpg
it's the black people who vote for democrats 90-10. them and illegal aliens vote democrat.
There's been so many over the years. The Coultergiest made a list once of all the Republican SCOTUS picks that went left after being confirmed. In recent times I would rank Souter ahead of ACB and Sandra Day O'Connor wasn't great either. Souter went full on communist and was even to the left of the evil personified Gingrich. Very few Republican picks stay conservative. Alito, Scalia and the incomparable Thomas are exceptions.
More, because he’s been there longer. Many of us here were skeptical about ACB before she was installed, so I’m not as disappointed in her.
The kids were the clue. I have nothing against the kids, it's the mom that can't keep her hands off kids from some other country as though there were no needy kids here.
Virtue signaling.
ACB has sided on all Religious Freedom cases so far. She sided with the people here.
ACB declined to participate in the most important case in American history. So fuck her.
He's not compromised, he was wicked from the very start.
I agree. He's compromised either through his affiliations with Epstein or something just as bad.
Unconstitutional. Stop asking for permission. Just do it and let these clowns play 'make believe' in their dress up court rooms. Fuck them
Pretty much. Let their ink on paper enforce itself, if it can.
Exactly, it's what literally every federal agency under this tyrant does. Federal government and most state governments are no longer legitimate and hold no moral authority after what we've seen over the past few years
Thank you. They only hold authority if people let them. Try walking into a church house full of people and try pushing them around. Good luck. There was just a video circulating of some health inspectors trying to get into a bar/restaurant...they were chased out simply by people chanting "get out". We can get far more convincing with actions way louder/stronger than chanting (if you catch my drift). Their time is over once we all realize we are in control!
Power only exists where people believe it does.
They don't need to ask. The SCOTUS blocked Californias ban.
yup 100 percent this it's a corrupt take over they have no rights over you or your faith, period.
Username checks out. The judges voted in favor of the churches.
It's not infringing on Religious rights, it's infringing on Everyone's rights so it's fine...
At least we’ll be “equally” cancelled. #equality
Nah, it's #equity now. Equality means everyone gets opportunity. Equity means no one does.
Equity plus interest.
Right? It's attempting to deny people the right to peacefully assemble. IN PRIVATE! Not even in PUBLIC?
You can't get a larger 1A violation than that.
Read it again 5 to 4 in favor of the church.
It's the 4 that are a problem. With the constitution, it's pretty clear what the ruling should be
They've always been the problem.
No argument there, but it's not a victory when 4 justices say "we can take your rights if we take everyone's rights"
But Newsom gets to meet for michelin star french dinners. Its a government meeting so its tots different guys.
The worst decisions should be like 7-2, the very worst decisions 6-3.
You know how the liberal 4 votes will decide before the case is even heard.
except it's not tho as we saw with the "mostly peaceful protests" last summer.
Remember, separate but equal was shot down because it was equal in name only but not in practice.
Unfortunately now we no longer have a legitimate federal government and most state governments are done as well
They sided with Religious rights. California has to allow Church services.
Law is whatever rules the most organized violent group of men will enforce.
All three branches are filled with tyrants, but the People must uphold any law to prevent or unseat tyrants.
We need a .win by state and patriots ready yo organize
Why are people asking permission to get together to study the Bible? Are people that retarded? Just go and study. Smfh
They aren't retarded, they are fighting the good fight. You need standing to challenge a law, so if they never asked for permission and got denied - they wouldn't have been able to have this law struck down.
They are Patriots and we should all hope to be more like them.
Someone had to be really annoying their neighbors for this to have become an issue. More like someone running a church in a single-family home with too many cars and such. That's just being a bad neighbor and has nothing to do with the bible.
Or leftists use any opportunity to attempt to crush the Bible
Screw that. If they shut down my church, I sure as hell am having as many people at my place to worship as I can manage. They will not trample on my liberties!
Maybe, but every neighborhood has that one nosy asshole who thinks they should be the arbiter of everyone else's lives. Probably that asshole.
There's always the chance for a neighbor whose counting the number of people entering your house for a gathering. But that should be very rare. It seems more likely that there was something else annoying the neighbor who reported a Bible study group.
GFY
You obviously have not had to deal with bad neighbors. You are either too young or too privileged and live in a special neighborhood with lots of HOA rules to prevent annoying neighbors.
How could you possibly know that?
Must be paladins.
Paladin of Tyranny. Lawful Evil.
Precisely...the government will never have a say in whether or not I attend church or study the bible with others. It's not up to them, never was.
Exactly. Fucking Republicans. Ask permission to observe the vote count while holding a court order granting your access, and then take no for an answer.
The title of this post may be a little misleading.
While yes, Roberts is a sack of shit and voted like the leftist he is to uphold California's in-home Bible study ban, overall enough Justices voted to rule that California's in-home Bible study ban is unconstitutional.
I almost flipped my shit when I read the title. This was borderline SHITPOST quality. OP could work for Mainstream News crafting headlines.
This is a win and it's a win because Trumps picks sided with religious freedoms.
agree, this was criminal mistitling here
Look at the comments. We have some headline edjumacated folks here.
Oh, I missed that. Thanks!
I just skimmed through to the John Roberts part and ended up assuming the libtards + Johnny boi won the day.
OP really should have titled it better. Also, I should read :)
We are in the end times aren’t we.
Of this country.
Of this planet actually
Yeah this retardation is spreading fast.
SCOTUS sided with the people. It's a win but it shows we have some shitty judges.
It’s a push, and they will play again soon.
They've sided on all religious cases so far this year. The one over religious speech at universities was YUGE. I don't see California winning without a packed court.
I agree with you, but these aren’t “wins”. We already had the right for religious assembly, like we had a right to bear arms not to be infringed, and every ruling upholding the status quo is just a push.
All of them are wins. This one being a push doesn't mean doom is ahead when cases this year have proven otherwise. You are in the right direction of viewing the constitution but fail to apply the great system we have which the left wants to destroy. This case made it to the top court after dealing with the 9th circuit. It is working exactly as it should. Take a look at cases during the Spanish Flu. Especially on Religious Freedoms. You will change your mind.
Who is cracking down on this shit?? My church has been meeting inside full capacity since June and no ones done a single thing.
I know, right? Who's even asking for permission in the first place?
That's what I am wondering. We have full service except on Easter when reservations are needed.
No masks at my church too 🙏
John Roberts is a fucking faggot and a pedophile. Disgusting motherfucker deserves a traitors end.
As usual fuck the police and Fuck the fbi, atf and dea
He's been compromised for years. I'm glad people are waking up, I just hope it's not too late.....
Sauce: https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/supreme-court-blocks-californias-restrictions-on-in-home-religious-gatherings_3770180.html
Another article that doesn't have a paywall.
https://www.westernjournal.com/scotus-strikes-californias-ban-home-religious-services/
He was picked by the satanic Bush family so what can you expect.
John Roberts didn’t “join the court’s liberal wing in dissenting” this time, he’s part of the court’s liberal wing ALL the time. We should be surprised if he EVER agrees with Thomas or Alito at this point.
Conservatives are “racist” but every single one of us would take 9 copies of Clarence Thomas on the SC. Same for Scalia.
Almost half of the Supreme Court voted against the bloody First Amendment. Lovely.
The government has no business telling us when or where to gather together for anything, particularly worship. Don’t comply.
LOL. How would anyone even know? I keep hearing loud music, large gatherings and the sounds of people have a good time together. In SoCal. They could just as easily be doing a bible study group, and it would make a lot less noise.
California is full of nosy ass social justice warriors. You could be in your car not wearing a mask and they would call the police on you.
What I have learned since this CV-19 Plan-demic is that we dont have a United States of America. We have 50 separate fiefdoms rulled by maniac governors who apparently dont give the slightest consideration to our constitution or their constituents. We have been labeled non-essential. To whom exactly? Them? Before that we were deplorables. To who exactly? Them? We learned in democrat metro areas like Seattle, peaceful protests meant murder and rape, and it was OK.They called it "the summer of love". In fact, the immediate need was to defund the nasty police. We also learned that Antifa is a myth.
Nope, the myth is there is no United States of America, if there ever was one. It certainly is no more.
The authority of the states has always been an important issue. The Civil War was not about slavery, it was about the federal government wanting more control, which it got, but now we are seeing a trend going back to state authority.
Interesting perspective. Thank you.
Pedophilia has its consequences.
I thought America was founded on religious freedom? They are telling us what we can do in our own homes now? Makes sense. I know they are blocking up restaurants and not allowing the owners to go into their own property they are paying for. This is all in the name of saving humanity from a virus that has many vaccine options and drug options and prophylactics. Oh yea it also has a 95% survival rate. But its"new" people don't know a lot about it...... by new I mean a year and half old
No man. They sided with the people. Justice Robert's sided with libs but conservative Justices outnumbered the activist. We won.
https://www.westernjournal.com/scotus-strikes-californias-ban-home-religious-services/
Even more ironic for California, the state founded by Catholic missionaries like Junipero Serra.
All institutions are compromised. Prepare accordingly.
What I don't get. If they think it fails the freedom of religion because they applied the same restrictions to secular, how the hell do they get past freedom of assembly?
That's some crafty headline skills OP. At first I thought it was a loss especially with the limited context. Seems Trumps SCOTUS picks pulled through for us. This is great news.
Here is another article of the win that doesn't require paid subscription.
https://www.westernjournal.com/scotus-strikes-californias-ban-home-religious-services/
Wish I could give you TWO upvotes - one for the sickening article about SCUMBAG BACKSTABBER Roberts and your excellent username - end the fed!
He's a Uniparty appointment.
Someone has Something on Him !!
Stop being shocked. Roberts is a Democrat. The days of pretending rinos aren't Democrats is over.
Before the rebellion the British limited public gatherings to three.
Media constantly says six to three majority, nope it is five to four.
John Roberts and George Bush hate America.
A move that surprised zero people.
Worst SC justice ever? 2nd to Warren, I guess.
Uh hello...RBG
and Souter. Actually the list is long.
They have something huge on him, it's the only logical explanation.
Do you think it has anytbing to do with his flights to the island with all the kiddies?
At what point is he just part of the liberal wing? You don't "join" if you're literally always there.
Someone remind me, what does the word unalienable mean?
And how is limiting secular gatherings to three people not an infringement on the right to peacefully assemble? What the flying fuck is this clown world. I think we’re well beyond clown world, and have been for over a year
Pedos, fat lesbians, wise latinas...
Its worse than just Roberts. This group of asshats in black robes just enumerated the grounds that California could flagrantly prohibit your first amendment rights that shall not be prohibited. Provided they treat others similarly, you can be banned from bible study at someone's house.
How the fuck do you get 14th amendment equal protection/disparate treatment arguments on a first amendment issue case??
This is a won the battle lose the war scenario here. Fuck all of these fools.
https://www.westernjournal.com/scotus-strikes-californias-ban-home-religious-services/
Yes, both sides in this 5-4 decision are dimwits. The difference between the 2 sides is that the majority felt that treating the secular activities with less restrictions was grounds to invalidate the restriction on at home worship. By this logic, if there was no disparate treatment, the restrictions could stand. The minority felt that the government complied.
How about both sides are retarded and you simply cannot prohibit someone from the free exercise of religion in their own homes. We don’t need to invent fake extreme examples of religions that nobody has practiced or does not/will not practice. This is a basic religious right that has existed since founding and prior, and an activity which has gone on since founding and prior. Fuck SCOTUS for inventing ways to take away our rights.
Yay! Rejoice that this law was struck down! But wait till those fags comply with the scotus logic and now get the blessing.
This is the 4th case in California that SCOTUS has ruled in favor of religious freedoms. They also sided with religious speech at colleges. They've sided on all religious freedoms cases so far (since ACB). I don't know why people are upset. We've all known Robert's to be a joke of a RINO Justice planted by Democrats/RINOs. Had Trump not selected these justices we would be screwed. This is a win.
its winning the battle not the war. Read the logic. SCOTUS majority opinion enumerates the standard to prohibit your free exercise of religion that shall not be prohibited. How you can call that a win is beyond me. Just because this particular restriction was invalidated does not mean this was good logic. Now, they have the template for how an absolute right isn't absolute anymore.
And then think about how they are using a 14th amendment equal protection/disparate treatment argument to invalidate what is a first amendment issue. That is bullshit.
You don't have to win the battles to defeat your enemy. That's how Washington beat the British.
The Justices addressed the case as it was presented. You are ignoring the previous religious freedom cases they have sided with this year. They've sided for religious freedoms. It's a win.
I've watched all of the cases. They all outlay criteria by which government can infringe upon your rights based on a hoax emergency declaration. Which, in case you didn't realize, there is no emergency suspension of rights in the constitution except for habeas corpus, and that must be expressly suspended. Instead of saying "Hey, you can't just throw away the constitution just because of some 'emergency' arbitrarily declared indefinitely!" They say "Well, if you treat x differently than y, you can't do that. If you treat x and y the same, then you may infringe upon their rights to your heart's content."
I don't know where you come from, but where I come from, that's called bullshit. And faulty logic. And the erosion of freedom. That is not a win. That is laying the ground work for a massive ass jam down the pike. So what if the current standard is tossed? What are you gonna say when the commies come back with a restriction that passes the standard articulated here? Are you gonna celebrate because they stuck with "stare decisis" and claim this is all legit?
You want me to doom over hypotheticals? You don't get it. Legal precedent and a win! That's what matters.
That's your brain on drugs. God speed to you and your effort here.
We won!
As pissed off as I am with Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch over the election fraud dodge, I can only imagine the court with 3 democrat picks instead.
Are they doing the same to Muslims or is this just adding to Christianity as being the most persecuted religion in the world
My only hope for the supreme court is for John Roberts to get exposed as a massive pedophile.
They’ve got something pretty serious on him.
Wish I could introduce him to very comfortable pillow like justice scalia
You know them by what they do. The state has no business meddling in religion by restricting it. California is no better than China in suppressing religion, to suit the desires of the Satanists.
Couldn't been said better if I said it. Undo1913 knows it.
Joe Biden says the Constitution doesn't apply to anything unless he seems it so.
I’m surprised that Barrett and/or Kavanaugh didn’t vote with Roberts.
Wait, is this the same John Roberts that was raping children with Epstein?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! How's that investigation going by the way?
Rush tried to warn us about Roberts way back during the ObamaCare case. He was right. Roberts has always sided with these demonic fucks on the big cases. Of course we know why, he was pals with Epstein.
Get the fuck outta our homes