THE GOP CONTROL BOTH HOUSES IN MICHIGAN. THEY BETTER DO SOMETHING. WE NEED A HIGH PRESSURE CAMPAIGN. SHOULD BE AN INVESTIGATION FOLLOWED BY ARRESTS . THIS IS TREASON.
Fuck that, FORCE them to do their jobs! Blow their phone lines up, send emails, write letters, stand outside of their offices, talk to them, if they don’t listen, yell at them!
Dominionâ„¢ operates Nationally from their World Headquarters in the Beautiful Boca Raton, Florida. Trucks and packages are sent out daily to each State in the Nation and 174 other Countries across the Globe.
Beat me to it. Some people here are just dim. Even if you hadn't heard it a million times that they're headquartered in CO, it's just a mouse click away to not sound like a complete retard.
Take census data, register 70-90 percent of them as voters, some real some fake people.
Have riggers submit ballots.
What they discovered was that the ratio of voters by age matches for every county in a state perfectly. Once one county's data was calculated you could predict every other county for the state.
And 2018 was stolen governorships to install a puppet in red states. Louisiana and Virginia specifically. Same method, republican winning until the very last minute then magically the dem votes show up. I thought they used the early vote to figure out how many buses they needed. Don't need buses if you have the machines come to find out.
I'm willing to say Kentucky was also a steal for the dems in 2018 and McConnell totally rigged his reelection too! Why don't you think he really wanted to talk about it? Hmmm...
Some people are getting the maths wrong on this. I don't think they understood the Lyndell video properly but all they've done is choose the curve with the highest correlation. You'll get a high R by default so they're basically tricking themselves.
It only started to get interesting when exactly the same set of points works on multiple datasets. They're doing a more advanced version of the mathematical mistake that Shiva made as far as I can tell and it's a distraction away from the real evidence that they have.
They do eventually start to apply it to other countries which makes it more compelling.
Agree. Frank's analysis wasn't that you can emulate the shape of voters. It was that the number of voters reported went above the actual registrations in many county and states. The Dark Pool voters (for want of a better word) were sampled when the numbers had to go up. The way you test this, as he suggested, is to go to the address of that voter and see what's up. Doing that would nullify that vote.
The 2010 census was used to create a synthetic pool of voters for the 2020 election. Another related issue is that this would have actually worked if less people showed up, since the total voted would have been less than registered. It would have been harder to find the pattern.
Those are anomalies that need to be investigated. One of the problems with mathematical analysis is that you need to be really careful not to fall in certain pitfalls. Often when you're running some equation to make a new plot and analysis you're running an algorithm, then surprise surprise the result looks like it's from an algorithm. In each case of something unexpected you can't jump to conclusions, you have to hunt for the explanation.
Saying that the uniformity of the progression in the difference between the two plots is something that needs to be explored and explained. I see in some of their approaches though they are running the risk of you get what you asked for.
The thing is there are many attack vectors for fraud but this one is curious because one that impacts the entire results like that really needs some extraordinary explanation.
For me if you're doing mathematical analysis and you see something so wide reaching that's a warning sign it might be a false positive. Global signals rather than local signals. I've seen the same thing with some analysis of the election results. You only need to commit a small amount of fraud in many places. You might need to only inject 0.5% fake votes, perhaps even less in places. You would want 200X zoom to get a trace of that and 1000X zoom at least to see its shape more clearly. When you start seeing things where you get a big signal at only 10X zoom that really doesn't fit the hypothesis properly of more cases of tactical and opportunistic fraud.
If you run a search to say find me the polynomial that matches the difference between these two plots (the lines on the graph) the best well then that's what you're going to get, the polynomial with the highest correlation.
If you're doing this on a single graph you might just be fooling yourself. They do it on other graphs and that is more suspect because they should not match so well though in the video they don't show their working out clearly enough to fully verify it.
That said the same as in Lyndell's video, even for a single graph this is curious.
If you look at the key or the poly nominal it's sort of a wave. It goes up and down. If you look at the registrations it's like a wavy wave. You see the large wave with the big ups and downs then the higher frequency wave with small ups and downs.
The polynomial shown is just the difference. The delta series. For that to exhibit so little suboscillation compared to the parent is indeed very strange. There's a big drop in variance that seems a bit implausible to me.
I would expect the correlation to match a polynomial increasingly more as you add degrees and for it to be quite high but things like less than a thousandth when the parent graph oscillates a few percent is a bit too tight.
They take some time to get to that. If the polynomial matches every country in a state really well, but stops working for another state but then you find one that does then that is quite suspect. Though if you take it for the state and then apply it to each country you are deriving the key lively to be the best overall match for each country. I think they need to put this all on a webpage to make it fully verifiable. Otherwise we fall into the trap of not being able to rule out playing tricks on yourself. I suspect what you'll see if you take it state level then apply to each country the higher the population the higher the R.
Not exactly. In the area of machine learning the problem of overfitting or underfitting a test set to a training set occurs when the resolution of the parameters defined in a line of best fit (regression analysis) is either too fine or too sparse. While saying that a 6th order polynomial assisted an algorithm to predict the vote magick on Nov 3 SEEMS arbitrary, is in fact a testable and reproducible stipulation.
Instead of using advanced mathematics, perhaps we can have one vote=one vote, maybe counted by humans and utilizing voter ID. If it’s complicated, it’s unnecessary and will lead to fraud. Voting is an extremely simple process.
The crux of the scam seems to be that they relied on total number of registrations as a pool to draw fraudulent votes from.
So voter ID is irrelevant because they are doing it algorithmically using people who are already verified, but may not have even showed up to vote.
That’s why they are desperate to have everyone registered, especially illegals. They don’t even need you to go to the polls, they just want you to exist in their database as a pawn to be used.
I think this would be easily detected in a manual recount because the backup paper ballots for these voters simply would not exist. That’s why they are shredding them.
We already have the tools to detect this fraud, the problem is corrupt people are preventing them from being used or ignoring the results.
The problem is that they fitted a curve, then used the curve on their training data, and found a correlation of 0.997. There was no attempt at generalization.
Can you please expland on what you're saying a bit.
I read all the documents and understand the allegations, but
something seems "to good to be true about it", because I don't understand
the modeling they used.
It sort of seems like they created their "key" from the data they were analyzing and then just ran it "backwards" in a sense and it low-and-behold it matched up...as in why wouldn't it????
Is that what you are basically saying?
They took data like 1,2 and 3 (and added them up) 1+2+3=6 and
then they went 6-1-2-3=0 and were like Holy shit-- look it matches up!
(I'm just making a bad analogy.)
Can you really explain what you see as a potential issue here???
Somethings feels off about it -- but I'm not wise enough to know what (if anything!).
Yes you are on the right track. Here's the methodology they used:
First they plotted registered voter turnout (number of actual votes / number of registered voters) against age.
Then, they fitted a 6th-order polynomial to this plot. This function lets you predict voter turnout at each age.
Then they multiplied these predictions by the number of registered voters at each age. This gives them the predicted number of votes at each age.
Finally they compared the predicted number of votes at each age against the number of actual votes at each age. This give them a correlation of 0.997.
The issue is they are just making predictions on the data they trained on to begin with, so of course the fit is near perfect.
What is interesting is that they trained on data aggregate across countries but the correlation is very high when making single county predictions. This seems to speak to correlations between counties.
From what i understand, the "key" is the whole state, and is applied to each county within the state. so applying a 6th order polynomial to the state and saying "Eureka" seems like some weak tea. but having that key work in each county in the state and testing each county is something else.
I think they are trying to say that it isn't just correlated, but it is
balls on the same -- a result that they claim can only come from
real-time "tweaking" as it went.
I'm on a Virginia election integrity team. I can tell you already the fraud goes back to at least 2012. probably back as far as the first digital voting machines.
Wow. That's scary, for lack of a better word. I have often wondered if VA is as blue as everyone seems to think it is. The common excuse is, "Well, it's because of NOVA." And that's probably true to a degree, but...
I live in NoVA, I was a democrat until 2017, I know 5 other people in Nova, 3 of them liberal women, who voted for Trump in 2020. There is no doubt in my mind that Virginia is more red than it is being portrayed, particularly in 2020. The evidence that I personally have found so far is that Republicans (and only republicans) miraculously split their tickets wayyyy more than democrats. So if you compare Potus to House votes or senate to house votes or even governor to virginia house votes, republicans always underperform their own house candidates, and democrats always over perform, sometimes to a crzy degree. Want Proof?
2013 was literally the worst year for democrats in virginia house in the history of the democrat party, they only got 32/100 seats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_House_of_Delegates
Yet who won the governorship? Terry McCaullife, he got 26% more votes than his own house candidates, and Ken Cucinelli got 7% less votes than the republican house of delegates candidates. Thats a lot of ticket splitting.
I did the math on it, 5,000-10,000 people had to have voted dem governor and republican house, and another 10,000-15,000 had to have filled out a ballot for dem governor only so McAuliffe could win in a squeaker.
Now why the GOP wasn't setting their hair on fire in 2013, I don't know, that's when we had a chance to do something about it. now we are in deep shit without a lot of avenues to get things righted.
Holy Fuck this pissed me off. We are living under an illegitimate Tyrannical Unelected Government. It just makes it worse. Fucking cowards aren't going to do shit. I'm so disappointed
TX was willing to sue the other states. maybe they will have the political will to push continued investigation, indictments, and Dominion machine destruction.
Texas didn't use Dominion. It was rejected by ours state for security issues by our AG and Governor. So I don't know what algorithm for Texas they're looking at unless Dominion had one for Texas in the event we decided to use the software.
This is all the reason they are holding up the last census report...my sister works at a Baptist College, they have students in dorms and the lady from the census office was calling her everyday about information and stating that this had to been completed fast and carrying on about how important it was to turn everything quickly...now that they were caught cheating they want to with hold the information DUE TO COVID, go figure.
7 states 50 or so counties 10 to 50 thousand people. told the rest of US to go pound sand,! so what are you going to do about this in your own town precinct? Yeah what are. You going to do except whine?
Who the fuck is going to do anything about it?
We knew this was fraud on election night when Antrim county admitted they flipped the votes due to the "wrong software" in the machines.
Everybody knows the election was stolen. Nobody is going to do a thing about it.
THE GOP CONTROL BOTH HOUSES IN MICHIGAN. THEY BETTER DO SOMETHING. WE NEED A HIGH PRESSURE CAMPAIGN. SHOULD BE AN INVESTIGATION FOLLOWED BY ARRESTS . THIS IS TREASON.
GOP. LOL. Nothing happens until we the people decide it's time.
Fuck that, FORCE them to do their jobs! Blow their phone lines up, send emails, write letters, stand outside of their offices, talk to them, if they don’t listen, yell at them!
They don't give a shit, it's a uniparty
GOP = Grifters On Parade
Then run for fucking office instead of whining like a little child.
"run for office." You're pretty slow, huh?
The real world runs on lawyers and paperwork, not a bunch of fat boomers capturing the nuke codes
You wish, pussy
You can do it in FL as well, let us push RDS and thr FL GOP.
Thank you for your ever helpful, and positive comments. Have you called/emailed either Desantis or Abbott yet? No? Then stfu.
You're either a leftist or just a high horse asshole assuming you're doing more than everyone else.
Not either of those things. Just sick of the constant negativity here by a handful of people, as all reasonable people should be.
This video is doing something about it. At the very least! You on the other hand...
Shut up
What are you doing besides whining on the internet about people not fixing this the way you want? Step up and make that shit happen hero.
Why the fuck is Dominion still operational in Boca Raton, Florida.
Are you fucking with me?
Call DeSantis office
Why is it still operational anywhere in the entire United States?!!!!
Hmmmm?!!!
Didn't think TX even had Dominion
Dominionâ„¢ operates Nationally from their World Headquarters in the Beautiful Boca Raton, Florida. Trucks and packages are sent out daily to each State in the Nation and 174 other Countries across the Globe.
Visit Dominionâ„¢ Today!
We Cheat Like It's Nobody's Business
Dominion US Headquarters are in Denver, CO: https://www.dominionvoting.com/
Beat me to it. Some people here are just dim. Even if you hadn't heard it a million times that they're headquartered in CO, it's just a mouse click away to not sound like a complete retard.
A lot of people didn't put this together either: https://patriots.win/p/12i48ga4yT/heres-the-real-reason-why-the-ml/
Humm,
Dominion Voting Systems Corp. 1001 Broken Sound Pkwy NW, Boca Raton, FL 33487
(I pass there 5 days a week on the way to work, fully operational.)
Ty needed that little brief humorous moment.
The fact they haven't gone through their sentences for treason tells you everything you need to know about the state of our country.
Too many faggots in here more interested in dooming.
Seriously should start deporting them.
Here's Desantis's contact info:(850) 717-9337 [email protected]
Here's Abbott: (800) 843-5789 - Information and Referral Hotline (for Texas callers)
(512) 463-1782 - Information and Referral and Opinion Hotline (for Austin, Texas and out-of-state callers)
(512) 463-2000 - Office of the Governor Main Switchboard (office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. CST)
Call 711 for Relay Texas - Citizen's Assistance Telecommunications Device, if you are using a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD)
No email for him unfortunately.
Yes. Deport the doomers.
Fuck them, read the sidebar.
Done. I’m sick of the lack of high energy. I usually never report, but it’s been practically REQUIRED as of late.
Thank you for the contacts
Take census data, register 70-90 percent of them as voters, some real some fake people.
Have riggers submit ballots.
What they discovered was that the ratio of voters by age matches for every county in a state perfectly. Once one county's data was calculated you could predict every other county for the state.
Every state committed fraud during the 2020 Presidential Election. Every State !!!
I wouldn't be surprised if POTUS Trump received 100 million votes when and if it is all sorted out.
And 2018 was stolen governorships to install a puppet in red states. Louisiana and Virginia specifically. Same method, republican winning until the very last minute then magically the dem votes show up. I thought they used the early vote to figure out how many buses they needed. Don't need buses if you have the machines come to find out.
I'm willing to say Kentucky was also a steal for the dems in 2018 and McConnell totally rigged his reelection too! Why don't you think he really wanted to talk about it? Hmmm...
https://rumble.com/vfjei7-interview-with-matt-deperno-on-new-explosive-evidence-submitted-in-michigan.html
Some people are getting the maths wrong on this. I don't think they understood the Lyndell video properly but all they've done is choose the curve with the highest correlation. You'll get a high R by default so they're basically tricking themselves.
It only started to get interesting when exactly the same set of points works on multiple datasets. They're doing a more advanced version of the mathematical mistake that Shiva made as far as I can tell and it's a distraction away from the real evidence that they have.
They do eventually start to apply it to other countries which makes it more compelling.
Agree. Frank's analysis wasn't that you can emulate the shape of voters. It was that the number of voters reported went above the actual registrations in many county and states. The Dark Pool voters (for want of a better word) were sampled when the numbers had to go up. The way you test this, as he suggested, is to go to the address of that voter and see what's up. Doing that would nullify that vote.
The 2010 census was used to create a synthetic pool of voters for the 2020 election. Another related issue is that this would have actually worked if less people showed up, since the total voted would have been less than registered. It would have been harder to find the pattern.
Those are anomalies that need to be investigated. One of the problems with mathematical analysis is that you need to be really careful not to fall in certain pitfalls. Often when you're running some equation to make a new plot and analysis you're running an algorithm, then surprise surprise the result looks like it's from an algorithm. In each case of something unexpected you can't jump to conclusions, you have to hunt for the explanation.
Saying that the uniformity of the progression in the difference between the two plots is something that needs to be explored and explained. I see in some of their approaches though they are running the risk of you get what you asked for.
The thing is there are many attack vectors for fraud but this one is curious because one that impacts the entire results like that really needs some extraordinary explanation.
For me if you're doing mathematical analysis and you see something so wide reaching that's a warning sign it might be a false positive. Global signals rather than local signals. I've seen the same thing with some analysis of the election results. You only need to commit a small amount of fraud in many places. You might need to only inject 0.5% fake votes, perhaps even less in places. You would want 200X zoom to get a trace of that and 1000X zoom at least to see its shape more clearly. When you start seeing things where you get a big signal at only 10X zoom that really doesn't fit the hypothesis properly of more cases of tactical and opportunistic fraud.
I am not following what you are saying.
If you run a search to say find me the polynomial that matches the difference between these two plots (the lines on the graph) the best well then that's what you're going to get, the polynomial with the highest correlation.
If you're doing this on a single graph you might just be fooling yourself. They do it on other graphs and that is more suspect because they should not match so well though in the video they don't show their working out clearly enough to fully verify it.
That said the same as in Lyndell's video, even for a single graph this is curious.
If you look at the key or the poly nominal it's sort of a wave. It goes up and down. If you look at the registrations it's like a wavy wave. You see the large wave with the big ups and downs then the higher frequency wave with small ups and downs.
The polynomial shown is just the difference. The delta series. For that to exhibit so little suboscillation compared to the parent is indeed very strange. There's a big drop in variance that seems a bit implausible to me.
I would expect the correlation to match a polynomial increasingly more as you add degrees and for it to be quite high but things like less than a thousandth when the parent graph oscillates a few percent is a bit too tight.
The point is every county fits the same equation.
They take some time to get to that. If the polynomial matches every country in a state really well, but stops working for another state but then you find one that does then that is quite suspect. Though if you take it for the state and then apply it to each country you are deriving the key lively to be the best overall match for each country. I think they need to put this all on a webpage to make it fully verifiable. Otherwise we fall into the trap of not being able to rule out playing tricks on yourself. I suspect what you'll see if you take it state level then apply to each country the higher the population the higher the R.
It is all available afaik. They literally have it down tot he addresses people can visit and verify themselves.
Thanks for the explanation.
We will find out Monday. I absolutely do not believe it’ll be over come Monday they are just going in to have a hearing.
Go to boca get some tar and feathers go back to some 1776 big dick energy and run those fucks out of town
No wonder why Biden is threatening to cancel the entire bill of rights-
The communist threats are even scaring the Dems to want to over turn the election.
Make this go viral
What can we do to help?
Exactly what the title says
The raw numbers are pretty convincing. I mean, any time you have more ballots than voting population . . .
DONT BE RACIST!!!!!
Be racist
Bigot
You prejudiced bastard! Dead people should be allowed to vote too!
Not exactly. In the area of machine learning the problem of overfitting or underfitting a test set to a training set occurs when the resolution of the parameters defined in a line of best fit (regression analysis) is either too fine or too sparse. While saying that a 6th order polynomial assisted an algorithm to predict the vote magick on Nov 3 SEEMS arbitrary, is in fact a testable and reproducible stipulation.
Instead of using advanced mathematics, perhaps we can have one vote=one vote, maybe counted by humans and utilizing voter ID. If it’s complicated, it’s unnecessary and will lead to fraud. Voting is an extremely simple process.
Voting *should *be an extremely simple process.
The crux of the scam seems to be that they relied on total number of registrations as a pool to draw fraudulent votes from.
So voter ID is irrelevant because they are doing it algorithmically using people who are already verified, but may not have even showed up to vote.
That’s why they are desperate to have everyone registered, especially illegals. They don’t even need you to go to the polls, they just want you to exist in their database as a pawn to be used.
I think this would be easily detected in a manual recount because the backup paper ballots for these voters simply would not exist. That’s why they are shredding them.
We already have the tools to detect this fraud, the problem is corrupt people are preventing them from being used or ignoring the results.
Obstructing investigation into blatant voter fraud is tantamount to treason. And should be met summarily with the same punishment.
You are explaining why they want mass mail in balloting and ballot harvesting.
Sure you could just straight right it with machines every time but recounts happen.
Love my conservative nerd math wizards! You guys are the best! We need your brains and fortitude!
The problem is that they fitted a curve, then used the curve on their training data, and found a correlation of 0.997. There was no attempt at generalization.
Can you please expland on what you're saying a bit.
I read all the documents and understand the allegations, but something seems "to good to be true about it", because I don't understand the modeling they used.
It sort of seems like they created their "key" from the data they were analyzing and then just ran it "backwards" in a sense and it low-and-behold it matched up...as in why wouldn't it????
Is that what you are basically saying?
They took data like 1,2 and 3 (and added them up) 1+2+3=6 and then they went 6-1-2-3=0 and were like Holy shit-- look it matches up!
(I'm just making a bad analogy.)
Can you really explain what you see as a potential issue here???
Somethings feels off about it -- but I'm not wise enough to know what (if anything!).
Yes you are on the right track. Here's the methodology they used:
First they plotted registered voter turnout (number of actual votes / number of registered voters) against age.
Then, they fitted a 6th-order polynomial to this plot. This function lets you predict voter turnout at each age.
Then they multiplied these predictions by the number of registered voters at each age. This gives them the predicted number of votes at each age.
Finally they compared the predicted number of votes at each age against the number of actual votes at each age. This give them a correlation of 0.997.
The issue is they are just making predictions on the data they trained on to begin with, so of course the fit is near perfect.
What is interesting is that they trained on data aggregate across countries but the correlation is very high when making single county predictions. This seems to speak to correlations between counties.
This is retarded you are treating voter turnout out as a constant when it is nothing close to that.
Thank you for your insights.
Still trying to wrap my head around it...
Is /U/Imransgarage comment about "treating voter turnout as a constant" an issue here as well?
It SEEMS like they may have done something wrong, but I'd be happy to know they didn't. Just feels oddly perfect.
would a good test be to leave out a county or two, then test the model on the two counties left out?
From what i understand, the "key" is the whole state, and is applied to each county within the state. so applying a 6th order polynomial to the state and saying "Eureka" seems like some weak tea. but having that key work in each county in the state and testing each county is something else.
What that proves is that voting turnout is highly correlated between counties, which is not a surprising result.
I think they are trying to say that it isn't just correlated, but it is balls on the same -- a result that they claim can only come from real-time "tweaking" as it went.
You are a moron and a shill.
30 seconds in the internet is enough to disprove that.
Abbott doesn't care, unless you can show how it impacts him directly. He's almost as bad as Kemp.
Boston Tea Party !
If just one state legislature or AG puts out a statement that their reported 2020 results were fraudulent, then the dam breakS
Even if Twitter and pals suppress it, it will get out. Everything changes then
Got me all excited thinking the Three Gorges Dam had finally failed
How’s VA doing? That early call for Biden was super suspect.
Agree. Fraud in VA but it always seems to get overlooked.
I'm on a Virginia election integrity team. I can tell you already the fraud goes back to at least 2012. probably back as far as the first digital voting machines.
Wow. That's scary, for lack of a better word. I have often wondered if VA is as blue as everyone seems to think it is. The common excuse is, "Well, it's because of NOVA." And that's probably true to a degree, but...
I live in NoVA, I was a democrat until 2017, I know 5 other people in Nova, 3 of them liberal women, who voted for Trump in 2020. There is no doubt in my mind that Virginia is more red than it is being portrayed, particularly in 2020. The evidence that I personally have found so far is that Republicans (and only republicans) miraculously split their tickets wayyyy more than democrats. So if you compare Potus to House votes or senate to house votes or even governor to virginia house votes, republicans always underperform their own house candidates, and democrats always over perform, sometimes to a crzy degree. Want Proof? 2013 was literally the worst year for democrats in virginia house in the history of the democrat party, they only got 32/100 seats https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_House_of_Delegates
Yet who won the governorship? Terry McCaullife, he got 26% more votes than his own house candidates, and Ken Cucinelli got 7% less votes than the republican house of delegates candidates. Thats a lot of ticket splitting. I did the math on it, 5,000-10,000 people had to have voted dem governor and republican house, and another 10,000-15,000 had to have filled out a ballot for dem governor only so McAuliffe could win in a squeaker.
Now why the GOP wasn't setting their hair on fire in 2013, I don't know, that's when we had a chance to do something about it. now we are in deep shit without a lot of avenues to get things righted.
Holy Fuck this pissed me off. We are living under an illegitimate Tyrannical Unelected Government. It just makes it worse. Fucking cowards aren't going to do shit. I'm so disappointed
What will we do?
First prove it beyond any doubt to the world.
We knew. Of course. We have to take this to the courts. It won’t get covered. It won’t seem like we’re winning. But we WILL WIN THIS FIGHT!!
Why is AZ never included in this? It fucking happened there also.
TX was willing to sue the other states. maybe they will have the political will to push continued investigation, indictments, and Dominion machine destruction.
Ive determined this, sent my findings to goveror, sos, local media multiple times... they are sit around with their thumbs up their azzes....
Michigan Senators. Click Contact for their email.
https://senate.michigan.gov/senatorinfo_list.html
PA Senators,
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/mbrList.cfm?body=S&sort=alpha
Texas didn't use Dominion. It was rejected by ours state for security issues by our AG and Governor. So I don't know what algorithm for Texas they're looking at unless Dominion had one for Texas in the event we decided to use the software.
Source??
Can't wait until they reach California.
By then it will be impossible to deny fraud.
Here we gooooooooooooooo!
This is all the reason they are holding up the last census report...my sister works at a Baptist College, they have students in dorms and the lady from the census office was calling her everyday about information and stating that this had to been completed fast and carrying on about how important it was to turn everything quickly...now that they were caught cheating they want to with hold the information DUE TO COVID, go figure.
Amen
I'd tried email and phone but DeSantis/his people never answers his damn phone.
Trying to find out how localities are able to still enact mask mandates when DeSantis seemingly did away with em...but God forbid they answer.
An off election fraud interview but pertinent
Trust the plan!!!!!!
CodeMonkeyZ is Q
Said HBO..
If anything actually happened to correct the fraud now, I can't imagine how I'd celebrate.
NO STANDING
MOOT
etc etc
We've red pilled almost every red pill-able liberal left in the country.
Now, we're all just waiting, impatiently, on the inevitable civil war.
7 states 50 or so counties 10 to 50 thousand people. told the rest of US to go pound sand,! so what are you going to do about this in your own town precinct? Yeah what are. You going to do except whine?
I will do my best to peacefully and patriotically resist this illegitimately installed regime.
This looks like a shit post
Legal Documents: https://www.depernolaw.com/bailey-documents.html
And will any of this change the outcome?
No, Biden can not be un-sworn in. There is no remedy short of boogaloo to install Trump as president before 2024.
I'm curious, why is there no Constitutional solution to election fraud?
there is...kind of. Before 1/6 the legislatures could have done something
only way to get Biden out now would be impeachment, and that just puts Kamala in the drivers seat