Chemical bombs don't explode immediately like TNT or Plastique.
They have a trigger, usually a small explosive device, and then an acceleration process that can take (depending on construction) several seconds.
What is shown in these videos is the result of expanding gases from the initial triggering device. Probably the skylight or air conditioner on the roof, being blown off the roof by the initial triggering device.
You can CLEARLY see the projectile going UP.
Then, the reason the smoke trail appears to come back down is because the smoke trail less dense higher up and away from the point of origin.
Thus, it dissipates from visibility higher up first as the level of dissipation works back to the point of origin.
But i don't know, maybe it's more entertaining to let our imaginations run wild than consider actual science.
Similar science was shown when "airliner" hit the Pentagon building... than the whole airplane completely sublimated into the thin air, leaving a laundry basket size of parts behind. It was all "scientifically" explained in the Popular Mechanics magazine. Nothing to see here or there.. move along peasant.
One event, 20 years ago, is not materially relevant to the present tense.
While it (the old event) can justify a healthy degree of skepticism, it does not mean that science, (in and of itself agnostic) is forever suspended.
So, above you express skepticism, fine.
But follow that through to a detailed thought process instead of just clinging to the skepticism and stopping short of a founded conclusion.
Dude. When do you think our descent into the present state got going? 9/11 marked a major increase of overt media gaslighting in support of permanent wars and a totalitarian surveillance state. The events now are a continuation of 9/11.
lol
Chemical bombs don't explode immediately like TNT or Plastique. They have a trigger, usually a small explosive device, and then an acceleration process that can take (depending on construction) several seconds. What is shown in these videos is the result of expanding gases from the initial triggering device. Probably the skylight or air conditioner on the roof, being blown off the roof by the initial triggering device. You can CLEARLY see the projectile going UP.
Then, the reason the smoke trail appears to come back down is because the smoke trail less dense higher up and away from the point of origin. Thus, it dissipates from visibility higher up first as the level of dissipation works back to the point of origin.
But i don't know, maybe it's more entertaining to let our imaginations run wild than consider actual science.
Similar science was shown when "airliner" hit the Pentagon building... than the whole airplane completely sublimated into the thin air, leaving a laundry basket size of parts behind. It was all "scientifically" explained in the Popular Mechanics magazine. Nothing to see here or there.. move along peasant.
One event, 20 years ago, is not materially relevant to the present tense. While it (the old event) can justify a healthy degree of skepticism, it does not mean that science, (in and of itself agnostic) is forever suspended.
So, above you express skepticism, fine. But follow that through to a detailed thought process instead of just clinging to the skepticism and stopping short of a founded conclusion.
Dude. When do you think our descent into the present state got going? 9/11 marked a major increase of overt media gaslighting in support of permanent wars and a totalitarian surveillance state. The events now are a continuation of 9/11.