1436
Comments (32)
sorted by:
46
FUSnowflake 46 points ago +46 / -0

SHALL not be infringed.

There is no Karen loophole.

18
G_regulator 18 points ago +18 / -0

Proving that "law abiding" gun owners want no laws by which they must abide.

What is this nu-speak drivel? Law abiding people don't want to abide by laws but she herself describes them as "law abiding"

This is making my brain hurt. The constitution states that "to maintain a free state a citizens right to own and bare arms shall not be infringed"

Therefore all law prohibiting the ownership of fire arms are not laws, they are infringements of the law. Making all gun laws illegal and therefore all gun ownship legal. As such all gun owners are law abiding gun owners.

13
HuggableBear 13 points ago +13 / -0

She's trying to point out hypocrisy, she's just too stupid to realize that it's already illegal to use a gun in the commission of any crime.

Oh hey, look at that, it's already illegal to even commit a shit ton of actions against your fellow man, too.

Those are the laws we're abiding by, Karen, not your stupid gun regulations to keep you safe from the people you're already safe from.

5
SpaceTiger 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. It’s not laws about guns we abide by, it’s the law of the land. The same laws everybody else is expected to follow - armed or not. There’s no difference.

30
REDMARAUDER 30 points ago +30 / -0

Biden stole New Hampshire.

11
Imransgarage 11 points ago +11 / -0

They stole everything in NH.

5
redditbiggay 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just the federal seats. It was huge win for the state positions.

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup great point pede. I still think the Senate seat in 2016 was stolen.

8
froggos 8 points ago +8 / -0

And a shit ton of other states. GA, MI, PA, AZ, VA, CO to start with

2
TheLionIsHere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blue State Liberals!

12
AmericanJawa 12 points ago +12 / -0

So...2nd Amendment II: 2nd Amendment-ier?

8
anonanomous 8 points ago +8 / -0

2nd Amendment II: The 2nd 2nd Amendment.

Or

2nd Amendment: Deuce Vult!

4
Tokyo20DrinkingGame 4 points ago +4 / -0

I really appreciate the creativity in Deuce Vult. Well done.

12
Ez_mac 12 points ago +12 / -0

It’s cute and all, but the 2nd amendment will continue to be stripped to nothing until the tyrants receive punishment

8
crazyjackel 8 points ago +8 / -0

Guns exist to fight tyranny, you wouldn't look at the people in Venezuela or north Korea and think "hey, they shouldn't have guns" unless you support that tyranny. Other governments and populations might be willing to take that risk, but I am not.

7
Global_Tornado 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gun owners don't like laws!

It's still illegal to kill, murder, and rob you fucking idiot.

5
SpaceballsThePede 5 points ago +5 / -0

LIVE FREE OR DIE

4
conservatarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Question:

Government representative freely and publicly acknowledges otherwise law-abiding citizens have a serious problem with existing and/or proposed laws and the conclusion drawn by supporters of the laws is malevolence lies with the opposition but not the laws. Which laws are in question?

A) 20th and 21st century gun control laws

B) Late-19th to mid-20th century Jim Crow laws

C) Late-18th century Tea Act

D) All of the above

4
trumpizkewl 4 points ago +4 / -0

If they actually pull that off I'll cuck out and start voting Republican again

4
redditbiggay 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sherry frost is such an insufferable cunt. She's the same lunatice communist that called a state trooper a nazi for fist bumping a guy with a trump sign at a rally. Incredibly stupid worthless cunt.

2
Kaisgrammy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t we already have this amendment? I’m pretty sure it’s the 2nd amendment and “shall not be infringed” is in the text. It’s a pretty straightforward amendment. Couldn't the republicans just stand up for that one? Actually now that I think of it, the republicans aren’t standing up for ANY of the amendments at all. None of them. Why on earth would anyone believe they’d stand up for this? They didn’t even stand up for our President Trump who was fighting for the constitution and Americans so they didn’t have to. It’s just ridiculous. Geez.

2
Seamonkey2010 2 points ago +3 / -1

what the frriiiiiiiiccckkkkkkkkkkkkkk how the frick do i move to New Hampshire????

2
Lepreco-Inc 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a strange sentence.

1
Dale_Gribble 1 point ago +1 / -0

AND YOU GET A FUN SWITCH AND YOU GET A FUN SWITCH AND YOU GET A FUN SWITCH AND YOU GET A FUN SWITCH AND YOU GET A FUN SWITCH!

1
anonanomous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like it’s right here Bob. It says... shall not be infringed. I guess uh. That’s clear enough.

1
Towel 1 point ago +1 / -0

All 50 need to do this.

1
Jmradioman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol imagine being so stupid you circle back to being based and not even realizing. Yes, sherry that's exactly what we want.

1
Food4thought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Libratarians?

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

As much as I love firearms, and despise gun control, I do have a rule for thee and not for me: I want to add several select fire NFA pieces to my collection. However, the thought of the general public being able to walk in to the sporting goods store and do the same is a little bit alarming. Not sure why I can’t come to terms with that. Maybe someone can set me straight.

1
Gr4ck3L 1 point ago +1 / -0

criminalize all gun regulation efforts

MFW that's already the law of the land 😏

1
entwickelnden 1 point ago +1 / -0

the law abiding does not mean to arbitrary gun laws. it means we dont go around committing homicides or robberies. But that shows where her priorities ly.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like how all the people who need to be deported are marking themselves with a handy rainbow flag. I hear Iran loves rainbows.