Easy, child B should sell their product to child A who is a paying customer. Child C can pull himself up with hard work and ample opportunity to become part of civilized culture.
i'm trying to figure out what the kids are supposed to represent
A is what, Authoritarian?
B is capitalism
C is Gibme (not socialism, because anything altruistic is just pandering for votes and once they get in power and pull up the ladders the gibme's stop and then it's over to option A)
Well, I don't really know. Make it about taxes and B sounds like
"Part of my money? I bought the tools/machines for my business. I was working on my own to make profit. It is the fruit of my effort. How could you possibly take it from me and give to someone else, basically redistribute as gibs?"
If child B made the flute, then it's hers to give.
I don't understand why the question is who I would give the flute to if it's not mine to give.
Me taking the flute that I didn't make or buy from another person and then dolling it out is playing Robinhood, and that doesn't make for a healthy society.
Trick question. There is no flute, there is no spoon.
Since the blue haired girl made the flute, but it is in fact in my possession, it very obviously means that I am a piece of shit tyrant who can redistribute the works of others to whomever I please. What's missing from this exercise in morality is the concomitant consequences of the action I take when awarding possession of the flute.
If I give it to anyone other than person B, I can guarantee that there will never be another flute made, because person B will say "fuck you" to working so hard for nothing.
If person A is the recipient, then person C will get angry because I can tell by her "woe is me" attitude that she will steal the next one that person B makes.
If person C is the recipient, then person A will demand that person B make her one or else she is a filthy bigot racist.
Is this about a skin flute, because Biden would give them each one.
preach already
Which one has been to band camp???
Haha! This one time, at band camp....
Easy, child B should sell their product to child A who is a paying customer. Child C can pull himself up with hard work and ample opportunity to become part of civilized culture.
B hires C and teaches them the skill of flute making. Becomes a business owner rather than a self employed flute maker.
C marries A and provides for her because ain't no way that A bitch is going to be making any kind of a living blowing this particular flute.
Nah. I'll pass on your social experiment
i'm trying to figure out what the kids are supposed to represent
A is what, Authoritarian?
B is capitalism
C is Gibme (not socialism, because anything altruistic is just pandering for votes and once they get in power and pull up the ladders the gibme's stop and then it's over to option A)
A: command line economics B: capitalism C: gibsmedat
it's easy.Child B.unless the other two buy the flute then it belongs to the maker.
i kinda like answer D
Child B pulls out the knife she used to make her flute and says "molon labe".
Beat them with the flute and throw it in the trash.
I think I just had a schadenfreude orgasm reading that!
It's a trick question.
Well, I don't really know. Make it about taxes and B sounds like
"Part of my money? I bought the tools/machines for my business. I was working on my own to make profit. It is the fruit of my effort. How could you possibly take it from me and give to someone else, basically redistribute as gibs?"
But the nuance might be lost on me
The answer is to whoever buys it.
B sounds like she owns it therefore it doesn't get given to her, she just keeps it or sells it.
If child B made the flute, then it's hers to give. I don't understand why the question is who I would give the flute to if it's not mine to give.
Me taking the flute that I didn't make or buy from another person and then dolling it out is playing Robinhood, and that doesn't make for a healthy society.
Trick question. There is no flute, there is no spoon.
Since the blue haired girl made the flute, but it is in fact in my possession, it very obviously means that I am a piece of shit tyrant who can redistribute the works of others to whomever I please. What's missing from this exercise in morality is the concomitant consequences of the action I take when awarding possession of the flute.
If I give it to anyone other than person B, I can guarantee that there will never be another flute made, because person B will say "fuck you" to working so hard for nothing.
If person A is the recipient, then person C will get angry because I can tell by her "woe is me" attitude that she will steal the next one that person B makes.
If person C is the recipient, then person A will demand that person B make her one or else she is a filthy bigot racist.
Who paid for it?
It’s not my flute to give commie fuck. Looks like it belongs to the blue haired girl.