You say it's retardation but you don't rebut anything
Corporations are a fiction by the state. Corporations give the owners protection from consequences so if there's a lawsuit it hurts corporation not the person. It's the state given entity you have an issue with yet redirect it onto libertarians.
This is lame post. You provide no context. I could imagine the context but you don't rebut it. You provide a screenshot but your post below is directly to the Twitter link anyways.
Is it slavelabor? Are they forced to go there? Below I read people saying textiles left the USA due to high prices and they're slaves there.
This post is dumb all around.
Why? This looks like the situation in Britain 1853. Or South Korea in the 1950s. There's a clear path to prosperity, andit isn't by holding up your hand for charity.
How do the normies read this and think "yeah, makes sense"
It fucking sweatshops my dude, it's child slave labor. Who is leaving their house going to work thinking "yeah sweatshops are great aren't they, think I'll write an article about how empowering child slavery is."
So if we don’t fucking give all our stuff away to minorities for free these idiots get mad, but they support sweatshops and slave labor in shithole countries. This is fucking clown worldx1000
America itself was built on hard manual labor, in the fields and then the factories and coal mines. Its a stage. You society can't become modern without passing through this stage. It is the path forward. At each stage, people did that work willingly because it was better than what they left behind.
Really? I must have forgot the part of American History where foreign countries exploited Americas workers and slave labour to manufacture shit and ship around the globe.
My grandmother worked in the sweatshops and eventually became a business agent who fought for the rights of sweatshop workers! Granny is rolling in her grave right now!
People shouldn't have jobs if they're willing to work
Thats how it is in this country.
Why are you simping for Bangladeshis and their globalist profiteer masters? Textiles are produced in Bangladesh instead of in South Carolina because producing textiles cost effectively in the USA was made illegal. Before that happened there were all sorts of people in America who were willing to work at those jobs, hundreds of thousands of them.
This country used to have a large textile industry, it was all offshored to Bangladesh, Vietnam & a lot of other places after globalism kicked in, starting around 30 years ago.
Write that article and submit it to Reason. The article you posted is about how Leftist policies hurt the actual people they think they're helping. It exposes their hypocrisy.
Because people don't care where their clothes are made only that clothes are cheap. When labor is a large part of the price of the final item then the cheapest labor in the world has a comparative advantage and can attract the factories.
incoming libertarian retardation about how this is a willing choice. Go blow your tranny corporate masters
"Muh private company is above the law; can do anything it wants consequence-free." - lolbertarians/retards
He said corporate, you said private company There's a big enough difference between the two
You say it's retardation but you don't rebut anything Corporations are a fiction by the state. Corporations give the owners protection from consequences so if there's a lawsuit it hurts corporation not the person. It's the state given entity you have an issue with yet redirect it onto libertarians.
Cmon man
Are you simping for the state?
https://mises.org/wire/government-property-sacred-your-property-not-so-much
I suppose we don't feel bad for those who had their private property destroyed?
The Cato Institute represents libertarianism the same way the heritage Foundation represents conservatism.
Also you've provided no argument.
🤡🌎
https://twitter.com/CatoInstitute/status/1381242399343718402
Thanks for source.
This is lame post. You provide no context. I could imagine the context but you don't rebut it. You provide a screenshot but your post below is directly to the Twitter link anyways. Is it slavelabor? Are they forced to go there? Below I read people saying textiles left the USA due to high prices and they're slaves there. This post is dumb all around.
How else are they supposed to learn a trade to support them for life?
It is their community college/trade school.
Welcome to the free trade world of tomorrow.
Why? This looks like the situation in Britain 1853. Or South Korea in the 1950s. There's a clear path to prosperity, andit isn't by holding up your hand for charity.
How do the normies read this and think "yeah, makes sense"
It fucking sweatshops my dude, it's child slave labor. Who is leaving their house going to work thinking "yeah sweatshops are great aren't they, think I'll write an article about how empowering child slavery is."
Peak Clown world.
Maybe because it lets people leave the grinding poverty of subsistence farming or lets them stop scrounging through trash dumps near cities?
Globalist Cock Brothers run Kato Institute
If it wasn't for sweatshops these women would be at home with their kids, and every woke western woman knows what a horror that is.
cato is only libertarian when it’s benefits them. like that governor of arkansas saying he shot down the transgender bill for individualism
So if we don’t fucking give all our stuff away to minorities for free these idiots get mad, but they support sweatshops and slave labor in shithole countries. This is fucking clown worldx1000
America itself was built on hard manual labor, in the fields and then the factories and coal mines. Its a stage. You society can't become modern without passing through this stage. It is the path forward. At each stage, people did that work willingly because it was better than what they left behind.
Really? I must have forgot the part of American History where foreign countries exploited Americas workers and slave labour to manufacture shit and ship around the globe.
America stole Britain's textile industry from them. Slave labor cotton and New England mills shipped cotton cloth all over the world.
Do you even know what sweatshops are?
Yes. But apparently you are in denial that sweatshops ever existed in America.
My grandmother worked in the sweatshops and eventually became a business agent who fought for the rights of sweatshop workers! Granny is rolling in her grave right now!
Why do you wish it were satire? People shouldn't have jobs if they're willing to work?
Thats how it is in this country.
Why are you simping for Bangladeshis and their globalist profiteer masters? Textiles are produced in Bangladesh instead of in South Carolina because producing textiles cost effectively in the USA was made illegal. Before that happened there were all sorts of people in America who were willing to work at those jobs, hundreds of thousands of them.
Did miss the comparative advantage lecture on econ 101, or are you in favor of full blown autarky?
I don't even know what you're trying to say
This country used to have a large textile industry, it was all offshored to Bangladesh, Vietnam & a lot of other places after globalism kicked in, starting around 30 years ago.
That's not what the article is about.
Why not? Its an important topic.
Write that article and submit it to Reason. The article you posted is about how Leftist policies hurt the actual people they think they're helping. It exposes their hypocrisy.
Because people don't care where their clothes are made only that clothes are cheap. When labor is a large part of the price of the final item then the cheapest labor in the world has a comparative advantage and can attract the factories.
Hell Britain had the first big textile industry, America stole it from them.
america first, slave labour bad.
That's not what the article is about.
oh Cato... how far you've fallen.