Attorney Eric Nelson and his helper demonstrate why Chauvin is innocent.
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (128)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Speaking of evidence and stuff. That video that Crowder made about the knee on the neck got age restricted by YouTube.
Chief Arradondo admits that Chauvin's knee was on Floyd's shoulder, not on his neck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEk3BGkJu_M
Sgt. Stiger admits that Floyd said "I can't breathe" while actively resisting, before he was ever restrained on ground
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdaexw4Vr4M
True to both. Floyd had a suicide by cop complex. Did the same thing months before. Look a the $$$ his family got. Best life insurance plan by far
Sadly this Life Insurance plan is only available to Drug Addicted Blacks
BLM = Black Liability Money
i don't envy his family one bit.
History shows that winners of lottos who don't know how to manage money are broke only a few years after "winning".
The money will only bring them misery as they tear each other apart for a piece of it.
Stupid beyond stupid. Minneapolis trying to buy the family, and the rioting blacks off. 27 million dollars even before the trial, and something that should have been through a civil case after a verdict. Throwing money around thinking that would pacify a criminal element. The blacks are holding Minneapolis hostage, and that city is doomed. It has reached third world status, and official corruption run by criminals !
Sadly, how right you are. Minneapolis should have waited until after the criminal trial and at least gone through a civil trial. Also, yep, Minneapolis is Third World these days. Look at most schools in Minneapolis. They are horrible. Minnesota “nice” has ruined much of what made Minneapolis so great.
It's not just Minneapolis.
We're supposed to be some super power, but a bunch of race-baiting extortionists have our entire political class and corporate leaders bending the knee to their demands.
I just lost my appetite for the day.
I understand it takes about five minutes for the effects of Fentaynal to hit you after you take it. That is about the time after Floyd was trying to spit some out in the back of the patrol car as they were dissolving in his mouth. Then as he was being held down he made the smartest statement of his criminal life. " I ate too many drugs". Do you think ?
But he could’ve been an Astronaut or Supreme Court justice!!1! - the media
I would actually believe those claims. Have you seen how low the standards are to be an astronaut or SCOTUS justice nowadays?
The medical examiner said if he found Floyd’s body with no context he would attribute the death to drug overdose.
I can not find the clip anywhere, but saw it during the trial. The MSM seems to not be showing that clip anywhere.
The worst part of it all, is they're trying to hinge the attributes of Floyd being dead, into attributes of murder. What I mean by that is they say "His body shows no signs of oxygen". Well yeah....it wouldn't....he's dead. If you did an autopsy on anyone who ever died of anything, you'd find a lack of oxygen to the brain...because they are dead and not breathing. It sounds silly, but this is the exact logic they are using in court. No bruising, no signs of choking, nothing.....but because he has a lack of oxygen....must have been killed by the officer?!
These medical examiners are already tainted. They admit to using the video of the arrest to come to their conclusions. That's not how it's supposed to work at all. They're supposed to tell us what the physical evidence on Floyd's body says, and it's for the court/jury to decide if that and other evidence indicates murder or not.
These medical examiners are effectively using the video to determine cause of death...which is ridiculous because the whole point of the trial is to establish if there was a murder or not! It's circular logic. In effect, these medical "experts" are trying to act as judge, jury, and executioner.
Every one of those "experts" has "We have to GET HIM!" written all over their faces....hell one of them even admitted that they waived their fee's because they "thought this was an important case". So it outright shows that they're trying to introduce a one sided view point to the court to try to get a guilty verdict. No expert should have an agenda, yet they literally admitted to having an agenda.
If you watch the whole trial, you'll see that these witnesses often try to introduce little extra tid bits to questions not even asked, in order to influence the jury toward thinking guilty. Completely improper to go outside of the scope of questioning, but they can't help themselves because they have an agenda.
Absolutely. Your comment is on point!