How many times have we seen this. These articles are the drumbeats of war. In the lead up to going into Iraq we had the media pushing scary WMD stories, in the lead up to trying to overthrow Syria we had the media pushing a narrative.
You find figure 4 which shows a sharp rise in terrorism in 2020 but no fatalities. Then when you look for the source for the number of right wing terrorist attacks you find one reference to a book by an SJW. The whole thing is a made up narrative by what they choose to count and not count.
Calling common conservatives terrorists also serves a legal purpose. It meets the criteria for US citizens to be target by intelligence assets (satellites, drones, NSA database).
How many times have we seen this. These articles are the drumbeats of war. In the lead up to going into Iraq we had the media pushing scary WMD stories, in the lead up to trying to overthrow Syria we had the media pushing a narrative.
The narrative is to get the public on board for the subsequent action. these stories are laying the ground work to demonize and then conduct war against conservatives. If you dig into the report https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/210412_Jones_Military_Police_Rise_of_Terrorism_United_States_1.pdf?
You find figure 4 which shows a sharp rise in terrorism in 2020 but no fatalities. Then when you look for the source for the number of right wing terrorist attacks you find one reference to a book by an SJW. The whole thing is a made up narrative by what they choose to count and not count.
Calling common conservatives terrorists also serves a legal purpose. It meets the criteria for US citizens to be target by intelligence assets (satellites, drones, NSA database).